Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
Serieses!
>
Not Numbered, No Apparent Order
date
newest »





See her comment here, where I was on the same "page" as you in this one.
https://www.goodreads.com/series/1172...

https://www.goodreads.com/series/1172... "
You linked to the series, not to the discussion. It's really strange if that is considered a series, because one of the criteria is that the designation should count for all editions. This originally Dutch book: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7... is not part of any series, according to the Dutch National Library.

https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
I see no reason this series wouldn't apply to all editions/publishers of a title, though I recognize that at the present they all have the same publisher.
As far as I can see, all editions of all works are part of the series -- which does seem to meet that criteria for non-fiction.
As far as order, personally I'd go with original publication date, if nothing else seems obvious.
As far as order, personally I'd go with original publication date, if nothing else seems obvious.

https://www.goodreads.com/series/1523...
Seems as if it would be hard for users to find something on the list. Any opinions about presenting them in some sort of order, or just leave it.