Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
This topic is about
Void Indigo
Book & Author Page Issues
>
Incorrect synopsis
date
newest »
newest »
mark wrote: "Incorrect synopsis for Void Indigo https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9...
Synopsis is for another book, something called Starstruck.
Not really sure what should go in its place...."
The ISBN was also for Starstruck. It's now updated and as I can't find other description, I've used the one you provided.
mark wrote: "Incorrect synopsis for Void Indigo https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9...
Synopsis is for another book, something called Starstruck.
Not really sure what should go in its place...."
updated with new ASIN and synopsis
Nurul wrote: "updated with new ASIN and synopsis "
Undone. Please never edit an existing book record to make it a different one.
And a new record instead.
Undone. Please never edit an existing book record to make it a different one.
And a new record instead.
the Goodreads preference is to have an incorrect synopsis attached to a book? it's an odd decision to keep an incorrect book record as is. this particular synopsis is not only incorrect, it specifically lists an incorrect author and illustrator.
We don't replace a valid ISBN. I was a bit unclear about the relationship of the synopsis to the ISBN.
rivka wrote: "We don't replace a valid ISBN. I was a bit unclear about the relationship of the synopsis to the ISBN."Yes, it's a valid ISBN, but belonging to another completely different book. Is it okay?
As far as the ISBN for this edition, it is listed as #0-87135-001-7 on my copy. the rest of the data is correct.
mark wrote: "As far as the ISBN for this edition, it is listed as #0-87135-001-7 on my copy. the rest of the data is correct."I looked up at Amazon, and both ISBN belong to Starstruck, but if it's printed so on your copy, then it might be the correct one.
Nurul wrote: "Yes, it's a valid ISBN, but belonging to another completely different book. Is it okay?"
Unfortunately, ISBNs sometimes get reused that way. There's a Note from several years ago saying that's the case here.
Unfortunately, ISBNs sometimes get reused that way. There's a Note from several years ago saying that's the case here.
rivka wrote: "Nurul wrote: "Yes, it's a valid ISBN, but belonging to another completely different book. Is it okay?"Unfortunately, ISBNs sometimes get reused that way. There's a Note from several years ago say..."
Yes, you're right. I've now recalled that particular issue.
I need assistance in removing a number quotesI apologize in advance on the volume of deletes
They are as follows
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7386...
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7386...
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7386...
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7386...
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7386...
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7386...
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7386...
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7386...
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7386...
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7386...
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7386...
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7386...




https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9...
Synopsis is for another book, something called Starstruck.
Not really sure what should go in its place. Here's what's on the back cover (admittedly not the best summary of the book but I'm not sure what else to use):
"In a savage era before the dawn of history, four sorcerers committed a heinous crime of torture and murder - and they thought they got away with it. They're about to find out they were wrong."
*cringe*
thanks in advance to any helpful librarian willing to remove the incorrect synopsis for this book!