Georgette Heyer Fans discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Group Reads
>
The Quiet Gentleman Group Read December 2015 Chapters 1-11
message 51:
by
Andrea AKA Catsos Person
(new)
Dec 04, 2015 05:34PM

reply
|
flag

Usually when I read one of the lighthearted GH books I bolt through the read, snarling at anyone foolish enough to try to talk to me. This one 2 days in & I'm not ..."
I'm glad I'm not the only one - I put the book down last night and still haven't picked it up again, it's just not pulling me in so far. I gave it four stars the first time I read it though, so I am cautiously optimistic...

This time I'm enjoying Gervase and Drucilla.



Oh well, I guess he's just too young."
Exactly - as his friend Warboys describes Martin's behavior toward Marianne and all the young male attention she receives, "Y'know, old fellow, if you had a tail, damme if you wouldn't lash it!" Just what every girl wants...

I'm up to ch 7. Martin is a terrible brat! His parents did him no favors spoiling him so!
If I had to c..."
martin is terribly spoilt, but perhaps can't entrely be blamed for it, since his parents brought him up so badly. He does show signs of being able to improve. I think myself that the darracott grandfather is worse than Vincent, it was horrible of him to cast his son off for marrying a mill owner's daughter, and he is nasty to Hugo.

True, but Lord Darracott does seem to see himself in a Pygmalion/'Enry 'Iggins role, trying to make the best of things in his mean-tongued way. And don't you love it when he realizes that the "weaver's brat" could probably buy and sell the whole Darracott estate and scarcely notice? "The stone that the builders rejected . . . ." >:)
P. S. Thanks for the typeface instructions, everyone! See, they worked!

I just started chapter 17 last night, and I am definitely enjoying the book more; I don't think it will ever be a favorite but I am really enjoying Drusilla and Gervase, and getting a very strong Lady Catherine de Bourgh vibe from the Dowager - I still want to kick Martin, though...


He's such a nasty piece of work.

Just what kind of husband did he fancy he would be?"
An immature one?



i agree. He's immature, spoilt, and thoughtless, but not cruel.

He was actually gentler than most of Heyer's heroes, who tend to crush the heroines in their embrace and ruthlessly kiss them!!

Oh, I absolutely concede I'm comparing him (with tongue firmly planted in cheek) to modern standards - a modern teenaged girl would've either flattened him for trying to touch her when she didn't want to be touched, or friend-zoned him, which I have it on the authority of my college-aged son is much the crueler fate...
I mostly get tired of Martin's tantrums and feel his parents did him no favors raising him to think he is the center of the universe - and as with most bratty, indulged children, he faces a disappointing and unhappy future if he doesn't grow out of it! I look forward to finishing the book to see if I agree with Tadiana at the end.

(view spoiler) I see him as spoilt rather than vicious.

(view spoiler)

Also, just thought of something - St Erth is n't married, so why is the Dowager Countess the "Dowager"? Wouldn't she just be The Countess?

Other card games I've seen mentioned are Piquet, Loo, and Vingt-et-Un.
The Countess is a widow, and a widowed titled lady was a Dowager.

I think the widow of a peer is referred to as the dowager even if the new holder is unmarried. I seem to remember that, in Josephine Tey's The Singing Sands, the young widow of Lord Something rather laughs at being referred to that way when her son, the new Lord Something, is just a little boy. And doesn't the mother in False Colours remarry partly to shed that aging title? Of course, Gervase's stepmother perfectly personifies the stereotyped image called up by that word!

see, that's what's confusing me...apparently, according to Wikipedia anyway, the widow of a titled peer got to be "the Countess" or "the Duchess" or whatever so long as the inheriting peer was unmarried...but that if the new peer *was* married,then the widow became the "Dowager" Countess, Duchess...

Anyway, surely the word "dowager" perfectly fits that aquiline featured, grey-haired, purple-clad, opinionated lady!
BTW, has anyone else here ever encountered the practice of calling a widow with a married son "Madam [last name]" instead of "Mrs."?

Never heard of that one. My understanding was that once you married a man, his name was yours for life -- even after his death, you remain "Mrs. John Smith."
Of course, I'm also of the opinion that you are Mrs. John Smith (since you are married to John) or you are Jane Smith (assuming you legally changed your last name) but you are not Mrs. Jane Smith (since you didn't marry Jane Smith!).

Of course, I'm also of the opinion that you are Mrs. John Smith (since you are married to John) or you are Jane Smith (assuming you legally changed your last name) but you are not Mrs. Jane Smith (since you didn't marry Jane Smith!).
.."
I agree !!!
Which is why it always annoys me when I read any Regency Romances where the married ladies attach the husbands surname to their own maiden name - I believe American authors are the worst culprits here. It wasn't the way married ladies were referred to - I remember my grandparents getting letters addressed to Mr & Mrs John W.

I agree! This is a relatively modern and American practice and isn't done routinely (or even commonly) here in England even now, let alone in the Regency!
MaryC wrote: " I also seem to remember reading somewhere that mail to a widowed peeress should be addressed to "Jane, Countess of ____," whereas mail to the wife of the current earl would be addressed to "The Countess of ____." Does anyone have a DeBrett handy?"
I used to use Debrett quite a bit when I was a reference librarian and I seem to remember that "Jane, Countess of ~" was the style proper to a divorced aristocrat (cf 'The Princess of Wales' becoming 'Diana, Princess of Wales'); but when there are two dowagers, as when a peer's grandmother is still alive as well as his mother, then the second one uses the 'first name' style to distinguish her from her mother-in-law.
I used to use Debrett quite a bit when I was a reference librarian and I seem to remember that "Jane, Countess of ~" was the style proper to a divorced aristocrat (cf 'The Princess of Wales' becoming 'Diana, Princess of Wales'); but when there are two dowagers, as when a peer's grandmother is still alive as well as his mother, then the second one uses the 'first name' style to distinguish her from her mother-in-law.
Elza wrote: "My understanding was that once you married a man, his name was yours for life -- even after his death, you remain "Mrs. John Smith." ..."
In Regency times I gather even 'Mr' and 'Mrs' were subject to a hierarchy. In Persuasion for example, the head of the family are 'Mr & Mrs Musgrove', while the son and his wife are 'Mrs & Mrs Charles Musgrove'; and in Mansfield Park nasty Miss Crawford revels in Edmund being temporarily granted the title 'Mr Bertram' in the absence of his older brother, rather than his usual 'Mr Edmund Bertram'.
In Regency times I gather even 'Mr' and 'Mrs' were subject to a hierarchy. In Persuasion for example, the head of the family are 'Mr & Mrs Musgrove', while the son and his wife are 'Mrs & Mrs Charles Musgrove'; and in Mansfield Park nasty Miss Crawford revels in Edmund being temporarily granted the title 'Mr Bertram' in the absence of his older brother, rather than his usual 'Mr Edmund Bertram'.
MaryC wrote: "BTW, has anyone else here ever encountered the practice of calling a widow with a married son "Madam [last name]" instead of "Mrs."? "
I've certainly come across 'Madam [Surname]' in an C18th context, possibly even C17th, though I hadn't worked out that that was the reason for it. I don't know how widespread it was.
I've certainly come across 'Madam [Surname]' in an C18th context, possibly even C17th, though I hadn't worked out that that was the reason for it. I don't know how widespread it was.
Elza wrote: "Of course, I'm also of the opinion that you are Mrs. John Smith (since you are married to John) or you are Jane Smith (assuming you legally changed your last name) but you are not Mrs. Jane Smith (since you didn't marry Jane Smith!)."
That's something that shifts around over the centuries: up until the early C18th the title 'Mrs' with her own forename was usual for both single and married women; and nowadays women who don't regard themselves as a mere extension of their husband use at least their own forename. It's a matter of custom that has a lot to do with the relative status of women, and customs change.
That's something that shifts around over the centuries: up until the early C18th the title 'Mrs' with her own forename was usual for both single and married women; and nowadays women who don't regard themselves as a mere extension of their husband use at least their own forename. It's a matter of custom that has a lot to do with the relative status of women, and customs change.

Absolutely! "Mrs." followed by a woman's first name makes me cringe! If a married or formerly married woman wants to use her first name, she can be "Ms."
As for "Madam," in Louisa May Alcott's An Old Fashioned Girl, when Polly meets the family of her friend Fanny Shaw, the author refers to Fanny's parents as Mr. and Mrs. Shaw and to her grandmother as Madam Shaw. The issue of how someone addressed the envelope when writing to Fanny's grandmother never came up.

So how many times have you read this
title?
I read it long, long ago, and then twice or three times in October in anticipation of our group read.
What format are you reading it in?
audiobook (Audible narrated by Cornelius Garrett)

I, too, see a lot of Austen similarities in this novel.
--Mr. Clowne/Mr. Collins prostrating themselves before the dowager/Lady Catherine (in "Pride and Prejudice")
--Marianne the romantic (like Marianne Dashwood, the romantic in "Sense and Sensibility")
--How St Erth finagles to play Speculation with the dowager and Marianne, and how he cheats himself to allow Marianne to win is right out of "Mansfield Park" where Mr. Crawford plays with Lady Bertram and Fanny
--the backwards hint for Marianne to play with Lady Grampound's bratty children is like the hint for Miss Lucy Steele to finish quilling the box for the spoiled child.

Or Anne Elliot having to play with her sister's rambunctious children in "Persuasion" --
MaryC wrote: "Or could it be the other way around--that whist was something new and racy..." There were different kinds of whist, I think. Hugo Darracott (Unknown Ajax) is relieved at not having to play whist with his grandfather because the kind of whist he's used to in the army isn't the same as what his grandfather would be playing, and there's another character, where I can't remember, who on the contrary quickly grasps the differences between the 'long' and the 'short' forms of whist which are played by different generations.
What is it that Arabella's brother is disastrously lured into playing? Do we know?
What is it that Arabella's brother is disastrously lured into playing? Do we know?

Bertram plays hazard in the gaming-hell.
"Never having indulged in any game more dashing than whist, Bertram spent some time in looking-on, but when he thought he had mastered the rules governing hazard, he ventured to join that table, armed with a modest rouleau."
Whist was considered the queen of games in polite circles. Old ladies played whist with whomever they could rope into playing with them. It was the game of Bridge of its day.
Later in the book, Bertram loses the 600 pounds playing Faro. That game has a table game where you place chips next to cards. Then the dealer turns up cards from a second pack.
Here's the address of a layout of a faro game.
http://www.desertusa.com/desert-activ...

Only when used in a culture where that wasn't done - without explanation. People can be called what they wish. It's interesting that in the U.S., in the South someone is likely to be "Miss Anne", even if married, but in most of the country would be "Miss Smith", or "Mrs. Smith".
Even with women keeping their family name, their children generally take their fathers' names (at least if their parents were married). (My nephew is a Brazee, even though my brother's widow kept her family name).

While whist was the bridge of the day - it involved more luck, as the trump suit was determined randomly. I've never been one who appreciate games of chance (although I love contract bridge). But Heyer's aristocrats seemed to prefer chance. I kind of think since their whole lives were based upon accident of birth instead of industry, this makes sense.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Quiet Gentleman (other topics)The Quiet Gentleman (other topics)