Please delete this book! (pt. 6) Showing 751-800 of 1,285

[[deleted user]]

Please delete this:
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/29...

already combine with the correct one.
thanks!

[Melody]

I got it.

[[deleted user]]

Thank you, Melody

Again, for this please: http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/30....

[Melody]

Gone

[Sandra]

3 more for "Super Librarian" (said in comic book style)

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/67...

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/71...

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/67...

All three have no info just the ratings listed. I've combined all three ready for your "superfullness".

[Lisa]

Sandra, I got all 3. Thanks for the pre-work!

[Sandra]

Thanks Lisa. No problem :)

[Ben]

Could somebody please delete this

Then combine this with this

Thanks!

[rivka, Former Moderator]

Got 'em.

[Lobstergirl]

Needs a super -

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/70...

[Lisa]

Got it, Lobstergirl. Thanks.

[Paula]

Needs a super to delete please

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/32...

[rivka, Former Moderator]

Zing!

[Paula]

Thanks rivka

and another that needs a super

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/96...

[Melody]

Got it.

[Kasia]

Could you zap this one http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/69...?

[rivka, Former Moderator]

Zap!

[Kasia]

Merci!

[Alycia]

Please delete The Bronze Horseman
I corrected the information and by taking the #1 out, I was able to combine this reprint with other versions. However, this poorly made addition I cannot delete since there are 16 reviews (more than the allowed 5 to delete). This is creating some confusion for other readers.

[Cait]

I combined that with its proper edition and deleted it, Alycia.

[Alycia]

Cait wrote: "I combined that with its proper edition and deleted it, Alycia."

Thank you so much Cait.

[Jesse]

These need a super librarian to delete.
A super could look at the user who created them because it looks like it could be a spam account.

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/75...
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/75...
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/75...
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/75...

[Melody]

I deleted the selections and reported the user.

[Jesse]

Thanks Melody.

[Melody]

Jesse wrote: "These need a super librarian to delete.
A super could look at the user who created them because it looks like it could be a spam account.

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/75......"

Follow up - user account deleted

[Ralph Gallagher]

I'm pretty sure these should be deleted. I haven't found anything that's confirming these are going to be actual books. Her site doesn't list anything about these sequels and neither does Amazon/ISBNDB/WorldCat. Looks to my like some eager fan made these up. Heck, "The Seeker's" description lists it as a "potential sequel."

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/61...
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/61...

[rivka, Former Moderator]

I love how they both have RATINGS already!

However, there is some proof (MTV interview), so I think they should NOT be deleted.

[Ralph Gallagher]

rivka wrote: "I love how they both have RATINGS already!

However, there is some proof (MTV interview), so I think they should NOT be deleted."

But she says "It's a possibility." Wouldn't it make sense to add these when it's actually confirmed? Even she doesn't know if there are going to be sequels - or if those will be the names. (Publishers are notorious for changing titles.)

[Cait]

Ralph wrote: "Wouldn't it make sense to add these when it's actually confirmed?"

If/when they're confirmed, these records can be edited to reflect the final information or merged into publisher-provided records. Either way will preserve these users' initial interest in these books.

[Ralph Gallagher]

Please delete this edition: http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/64...

The book already has the correct edition listed.

[Lisa]

Ralph, Thanks, It's gone.

[g026r]

This edition should probably be deleted, as it's got fewer reviews than the other entry for the exact same edition:

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/76...

[Cait]

g026r wrote: "This edition should probably be deleted, as it's got fewer reviews than the other entry for the exact same edition"

Done, after copying the description to the edition that was kept so it wouldn't be lost.

FYI, it doesn't matter which edition has more reviews; as long as they're combined, all of the reviews will shift to the one that isn't deleted. All of the information on the deleted edition will be lost, though, so one edition needs to have all of the info set before the other is deleted.

[g026r]

Cait wrote: "FYI, it doesn't matter which edition has more reviews; as long as they're combined, all of the reviews will shift to the one that isn't deleted."

Noted and thanks.

[Andrew]

Please could you delete this ?
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/15...

Seems to be just a set of bookmarks !

[Ralph Gallagher]

Andrew (Ace) wrote: "Please could you delete this ?
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/15...

Seems to be just a set of bookmarks !"

That wouldn't be deleted, it gets Not-A-Booked.

[Andrew]

What does one of those look like, once it's been done ?

[rivka, Former Moderator]

Go back and look at your link -- Ralph took care of NABing it.

[Andrew]

:-)

[Plch]

Superlibrarian needed:
There is a big mess around
Terry Pratchett's Men at Arms (The Play)
by Terry Pratchett, Stephen Briggs (adapter) which was combined with the original Men at Arms: I separated them but it was a mistake because most of comments on the original book were under this edition, it should be combined back (I can do that) and then it should be deleted by a superlibrarian (another librarian already prepared a new book with the correct isbn).
http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/34...

[rivka, Former Moderator]

Next time, when a book has a note like that, please do NOT separate them.

Cait, I recombined, but I'm not sure I got the right one. Can you please check?

[Plch]

I know, unfortunately the note appeared just in the edit and combining pages, *not* in the page for separating different editions of the same book. I am usually quite careful... at least I hope so.
You have correctly combined the two plays BUT there is the problems of the comments about men at arms that stayed there ... I guess everything should be done again... sorry again.

[Cait]

rivka wrote: "Next time, when a book has a note like that, please do NOT separate them.

Cait, I recombined, but I'm not sure I got the right one. Can you please check?"

No, I looked through the reviews and all that I could see were for the novel, not the play, so it needs to be merged into the novel.

Details here: http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/2...

[Plch]

thank you, I'm very sorry for the mess I made just because today I happened to check my Terry Pratchett's edition...
(covering my head with ashes)

[Cait]

Plch wrote: "thank you, I'm very sorry for the mess I made just because today I happened to check my Terry Pratchett's edition...
(covering my head with ashes)"

:) Well, at least you checked it, Plch, unlike approximately four thousand people who had the play shelved as the novel!

[rivka, Former Moderator]

Including some friends of mine (for shame)!

Also, Plch, you left a note. Which makes a BIG difference. No ashes necessary.

[JG (Introverted Reader)]

Please delete. http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/74...

I'm pretty sure this one can be deleted and then re-combined. http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/75...

This one can definitely be deleted and re-combined. http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/74...

[rivka, Former Moderator]

Zing!

[JG (Introverted Reader)]

I missed one. http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/66...

[Lisa]

JG, I got that one.