Reading the Detectives discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Archived threads
>
What mysteries are you reading at the moment? Old thread

There is no story arc in the Miss Silver books so it doesn't matter which order you read them in. She sometimes mentions other books but there are no spoilers.
Yes, a lot of early Golden Age books are plot driven - rather than character driven - and, in that case, the series order is less important.

I will always read in order, if I can, Jan. However, I am currently reading, Murder of a Lady and that is a later book featuring the author's sleuth.
Talking of good mysteries, this is not a Golden Age one, but I recently finished The Night of the Mi'raj, which was an excellent novel set in Saudi Arabia.
So many mysteries have great settings, don't they? Whether they are set in a country you know relatively little about or perhaps on the Titanic, sometimes the setting can help make a book. Has anyone else read a mystery where they loved the place it was set as much as the mystery?
Talking of good mysteries, this is not a Golden Age one, but I recently finished The Night of the Mi'raj, which was an excellent novel set in Saudi Arabia.
So many mysteries have great settings, don't they? Whether they are set in a country you know relatively little about or perhaps on the Titanic, sometimes the setting can help make a book. Has anyone else read a mystery where they loved the place it was set as much as the mystery?

I read The Crow Trap a few weeks ago and really enjoyed it. I'll be looking out for more of her books this year.

This is exactly how I feel about Louise Penny's Three Pines mysteries. Every time I read one I want to pack up and move there immediately.
To a lesser degree I feel the same way about Moose County from the Qwilleran cozy mysteries.

An interesting location definitely adds a lot to the experience of reading a mystery. I love the setting of Venice in the series of Commissario Brunetti novels by Donna Leon, though I haven't read any of them for a while.

I agree, although unless that setting is a major urban center (such as Venice), the repeated murders can stretch the limits of credulity sometimes (Moose county suffered from this for me).
Yes, sometimes very rural and peaceful areas seem to have more murders than downtown Detroit, don't they?! I also enjoy books which are set in closed communities - whether that is on board a cruise ship or in a convent. P D James was very adept at that kind of mystery, which had a limited number of possible suspects and they ALL had a good motive...

There's a long-running TV series here in the UK called Midsomer Murders set in a small village. After over 100 episodes there are jokes about whether anyone is left alive in the area! In fact I just searched to check the spelling and found out that the latest episode didn't feature a murder at all, so maybe they have run out of victims!
HJ - you are quite right, it is often quite unbelievable. St Mary Mead was quite a dangerous location, if I recall correctly...

.

me too, but only as a member of the family, definitely not a servant! *:D

Thinking of my favorite series, I think it depends a great deal on the series. For example, in the Evan Evans series, it make sense to read them roughly in order because he does develop over time, girlfriends come and go and come again, he -- well, don't want to issue spoilers, but let's just say that if you read out of order you have to imagine some things happening in books you haven't read yet. With Lord Peter, especially the Harriet Vane books are much better read in order. But in the Nero Wolfe series, I think it matters very little which order they are read in (with a few exceptions; Family Affair should be read later rather than sooner). And with Miss Marple, I don't see any reason why reading in order makes any difference at all.

"
Oh, yes, many.
The Amelia Peabody books are so heavily centered on Egypt, and I find the settings every bit as interesting as the plots. The author, Barbara Mertz, writing as Elizabeth Peters, was an accomplished Egyptologist, and I understand that her descriptions of Egypt, the antiquities, and the settings are very true to fact.
In Robert Upfield's Bony mysteries the Australian outback forms a major element in the stories, and is a delightful introduction to a part of the world most of us have no experience with. (Do we have any Australian members who can verify or dispute the accuracy of his descriptions?)
And VanGulick's Judge Dee mysteries again are written by a very experienced Sinologist, and are a wonderful background to the stories.

But, I assume, only as member of the family. There was a series, I think called Manor House, where they tried to fairly replicate the lives of an Edwardian house, and those who took the roles of servants quickly rebelled (they lost I think at least two kitchen maids who just couldn't take it.) I know that for servants at the time it was just the way life was, but whenever I imagine myself living in those days it's always as one of the gentry!

I don't mind cooking or cleaning or doing the laundry so having a ladies maid would be my dearest wish. I was love it if someone would pick out my clothes and be responsible for making me look presentable. I keep hoping my DD (11 yo) is going to develop and interest in hair or makeup because I will be delighted to let her experiment on me.


A worthwhile read though.

"
...In Robert Upfield's Bony mysteries the Australian outback forms a major element in the stories, and is a delightful introduction to a part of the world most of us have no experience with. (Do we have any Australian members who can verify or dispute the accuracy of his descriptions?)..."
Oh, I had forgotten about these -- Upfield always made me want to visit the outback (even though in general it is not a place that sounds appealing to me). I have read his mysteries more than once because the setting (both place and time) are so good to read about that it didn't matter if I remembered the solution of the mystery.

I'm listening to The Toll-Gate by Georgette Heyer, which is a Regency mystery. Much more mystery than romance.

"
Oh, yes, many.
The Amelia Peabody books are so heavily centered on Egypt, and I find..."
I'm not an Australian, but do live close by - New Zealand.
Arthur Upfield wrote the Bony series of books. He was born in England, but was sent to Australia when he was around 20 years old. If I recall his father was displeased with his lack of academic/employment achievements. During WWI he met and married a nurse, and when they returned to Australia they travelled around the country, particularly the outback, where he took a great interest in the Aboriginal culture. And it was the knowledge he gained through this that became the Bony series.
The books were made into a TV series in the early 1970s, but were given the title Boney. As I recall, since I know you are asking, the spelling used for the TV shows was supposed to have also been used for the books, but there had been an uncorrected typo. Another story was that the Boney spelling made it clear how the name should be said. The TV series was a great success 'downunder', and the lead was a New Zealand actor!
Lots of great books to explore in all your posts - many thanks! I have also read, and enjoyed, the Amelia Peabody series and loved the ones I have read.


http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/...
I have started, "Death in the Stocks." I have never read anything by Heyer before, but I have a feeling I will be reading more by her.



:) I am looking forward to rereading that in a few days! I am always happy when new people discover Heyer.


I haven't read it for at least ten year, but as soon as I started it, the magic was back. It's more heavily Archie than many of the Nero Wolfe books. But delightful.

I haven't read it for at least ten year, but as soon as I started it, the magic was back. It's more heavily Arc..."
I am waffling between re-re-reading a Stout (The Doorbell Rang) or a Ngaio Marsh (Death in Ecstasy)...

I am waffling between re-re-reading a Stout (The Doorbell Rang) or a Ngaio Marsh (Death in Ecstasy)... ."
You can't lose either way. But I do love "The Doorbell Rang." At least if you're old enough to remember a certain person I won't name to avoid spoilers.


http://www.newyorker.com/books/page-t...
Very interesting - thanks for the link, Miss M. Interesting to learn that T.S. Eliot was such a fan of the genre.


I've just been reading another interesting article about Golden Age fiction, by P.D. James , which was published in 2013. The headline is "Who killed the golden age of crime?" She quotes the same passage from Dorothy Sayers about how she invented Lord Peter Wimsey that we were discussing here the other day.
http://www.spectator.co.uk/2013/12/a-...
I'm reading The Golden Age of Murder by Martin Edwards at the moment, so am very interested in getting extra background from articles like these.
http://www.spectator.co.uk/2013/12/a-...
I'm reading The Golden Age of Murder by Martin Edwards at the moment, so am very interested in getting extra background from articles like these.
Miss M, I've just read that Wilson piece too, and, despite his general disdain for crime fiction, I have to suspect he could easily have become a Rex Stout fan - he read quite a number of his books before deciding he didn't like them!

http://www.jackson-stops.co.uk/london...
http://www.countrylife.co.uk/property...
Judy, thanks for the PD James info, I'll have to get caught up this evening.
Carolien, now I'm definitely interested in SS Van Dine!

http..."
There is a biography of Huntington that I've been reading for a while, Alias S.S. Van Dine by John Loughery. I don't think I have yet gotten to the point where he starts writing mysteries, although he is connected with The Smart Set.


"A key tenet of Golden Age detection was “fair play”—the idea that an attentive reader must in theory have as good a shot at solving the mystery as the story’s detective. "
While I have enjoyed many a mystery which doesn't 'play fair', I do prefer to have a chance at figuring out who did it!

Thank you for the link, Judy. I'm also reading The Golden Age of Murder. Wouldn't you say that P.D. James was incorrect when she said "The women writers ... were particularly popular and successful"? Given the examples detailed by Martin Edwards I don't think that was so, at the time.
What I do think is true is that the writers she named (Agatha Christie, Dorothy L. Sayers, Josephine Tey, Margery Allingham and Ngaio Marsh) have stayed popular and are still read today, whereas the majority of the male writers who were enormously popular at the time have been forgotten since. Of course, some are being rediscovered and republished now.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Earthly Remains (other topics)A Rule Against Murder (other topics)
Earthly Remains (other topics)
Earthly Remains (other topics)
The Lake House (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Kate Morton (other topics)E.F. Benson (other topics)
E.F. Benson (other topics)
Ed McBain (other topics)
Leslie Charteris (other topics)
More...
It's not a problem. I've read her books in the order I acquired them and she always provides enough information that you know where the characters fit in, but the mysteries are standalone.