Invisible Man
    discussion
  
  
    Relationship between Narrator and Bledsoe
    
  
  
					date
						  
						newest »
				
		
						  
						newest »
				
      I think you're right. Except that when one's safety isn't in question (up North for example, where there was no KKK) survival is substituted with ambition. Bledsoe may have done things in his way to survive (although, admittedly he did them to get ahead as well), while the Narrator realizes that to get ahead in the world he would have to adopt a pandering attitude similar to Bledsoe. It's this realization, to me, that is the crux of the entire novel. While race is certainly a factor -- up north, down south, back then and today -- cultural vicissitudes will often be used by individuals solely to advance their individual goals, desires, and needs. The narrator sees that racism has no practical connection to how people treat one another, because people of all races refuse to see each other as human beings. When he looks at people for who they are truly, and this includes himself, he becomes invisible.
    
    all discussions on this book
      |
      post a new topic
    
  
    
  
  
    
    
      
I started to wonder whether Ellison was building a parallel between the Narrator and the kow-towing Bledsoe. It seems that the Narrator's focus at a certain point, rather than becoming a productive member of society is survival. That while he hates Bledsoe, in spite of himself he learns what must drive a man to become career motivated as a form of survival. To that end, I found it interesting that the moment he decides to kill Bledsoe is when he meets the Brotherhood, as though he is about to learn a hard lesson about what made Bledsoe what he was, and ultimately the Narrator forgets his plans to return to the South.