Bisky's Twitterling's Scribbles! discussion
Community/Brainstorming/Problems
>
Brainstorming help - Terraforming team
date
newest »


Oh, and I second the problems with Absolute Write. They were incredibly hostile to me last year, and as a newly published writer I thought that was awful behaviour.

I think that a lot of your team's requirements would be based on the method of terraforming used. For example, In Star Trek Wrath of Khan it was essentially a bomb that they launched and then observed the results. If you were to use a more mechanized means engineers and technicians would be in high demand. Nanobots - I roboticist might be needed.
Whatever the method, I think your team could use an ecologist for oversight although the biologist could do double duty. (Geneticist could also be another role for the botanist.)
I don't know how key either character might be to the story but in terms of plot I would say that the Captain and 2nd in command are redundant and one could be expendable.

And yep, every member needs to play a double-duty role. So one team's 2nd is also a botanist, and the other is an engineer. The designation is more for plot purposes, so when the 2nd is killed, the captain is more furious. Though it might not matter, cause she should be off getting another botanist ... but instead enacts revenge. :-)
So would physicist be way too extraneous? I'm leaning toward yes now.


- Captain / project manager / leader
- Pilot/ security officer
- a genius scientist-researcher with PhD in biology, chemistry and medicine or a sentient robot
- an engineer to fix their mess

But it seems like we're coming to a consensus. I think it's a good point to have a captain play only the one role, but s/he has a background in something. I will ponder further.
Would a geologist of some sort be needed? Just because it's terraforming, as the pointless crewman number 6.
Not to bash either but I have to really suppress my inner troll on AW xD But its an amazing resource :3 Just not well modded.
Not to bash either but I have to really suppress my inner troll on AW xD But its an amazing resource :3 Just not well modded.


Therapist is also a good suggestion, but it doesn't fit the character. This dude is evil. I think I'll make him the security guy. Lots of evil can be done under the guise of keeping people safe. :3
(And yeah, the problem I've had with AW is sometimes the mods let people [whom I assume are their buddies/long-time members] run wild, or the mods themselves have VERY strong opinions about certain subjects and don't like dissenting opinions.)
s: "I'm also looking for one role that is sort of not needed, but that isn't blatently pointless. I was thinking physicist."
as an amateur physicist (1 of 7 on earth), i resent the implication.
but okay.
about 50-60 years ago an audacious evolutionist proclaimed that we modify our genetic material on a daily basis. her idea was, of course, ridiculous. fortunately, every other scientist on earth let her know how ridiculous she was being, but a problem arose.
research and experimentation, over time, proved she was right. (cur!)
so i vote for an evolutionist.
i'm sure this is too impositional, but the plot twists that this could create are immense and, imho, important.
what if your team evolutionist discovered that the terraforming was modifying the planet's aboriginal life? you probably chose a planet w/o life, but i wonder if any planet can be terraformed that hasn't the predispositon toward life. ergo, something wicked this way comes. the prokaryotic critters that swarmed earth so gleefully before their excrement--mostly oxygen--paved the way for we homo saps, might be disappointed to learn that they aren't viable in our pretty eyes, and yet some version of them will certainly populate any planet we choose to befoul.
of course, nobody but a scientist would understand this, so you can build planetary biospheres as you wish; no harm done. but i thought you might like the idea.
btw, i don't recall the daring evolutionist's name, but its in my meager library, so lemme know if you want to read about her.
as an amateur physicist (1 of 7 on earth), i resent the implication.
but okay.
about 50-60 years ago an audacious evolutionist proclaimed that we modify our genetic material on a daily basis. her idea was, of course, ridiculous. fortunately, every other scientist on earth let her know how ridiculous she was being, but a problem arose.
research and experimentation, over time, proved she was right. (cur!)
so i vote for an evolutionist.
i'm sure this is too impositional, but the plot twists that this could create are immense and, imho, important.
what if your team evolutionist discovered that the terraforming was modifying the planet's aboriginal life? you probably chose a planet w/o life, but i wonder if any planet can be terraformed that hasn't the predispositon toward life. ergo, something wicked this way comes. the prokaryotic critters that swarmed earth so gleefully before their excrement--mostly oxygen--paved the way for we homo saps, might be disappointed to learn that they aren't viable in our pretty eyes, and yet some version of them will certainly populate any planet we choose to befoul.
of course, nobody but a scientist would understand this, so you can build planetary biospheres as you wish; no harm done. but i thought you might like the idea.
btw, i don't recall the daring evolutionist's name, but its in my meager library, so lemme know if you want to read about her.
david: "I'm not sure what role if any a physicist would have."
david, you're killin me! if there's no physicist aboard, who will start all the arguments that nobody understands? who will write the books that nobody reads? who will be a cosmological treasure, but too impractical to wash the dishes?
i think you should rethink your thinking.
david, you're killin me! if there's no physicist aboard, who will start all the arguments that nobody understands? who will write the books that nobody reads? who will be a cosmological treasure, but too impractical to wash the dishes?
i think you should rethink your thinking.
equally useless thought:
if you write your story as a script and name it "terrorforming," the sciFi channel will buy it w/o reading it. if you've watched much of their self-generated "sciFi," you'll probably agree that none of them know HOW to read.
thus ending my snarky comments for today, april 1.
if you write your story as a script and name it "terrorforming," the sciFi channel will buy it w/o reading it. if you've watched much of their self-generated "sciFi," you'll probably agree that none of them know HOW to read.
thus ending my snarky comments for today, april 1.
I'm doing brainstorming for a new WIP, a science fiction novel about feuding terraforming teams. I'm going to do some research on what's actually known now about terraforming to try and base it on hard science, but I'm trying to build out my character list first.
In this galaxy, corporations send out a terraforming team to get a start on a planet. Each team has four members, with a lot of AI / mechanical help. If you were to build out a team, what are the types of people you'd want to bring?
Here's what I have so far, and since i'm going for only four, I'll have a lot of overlap. (These guys are the best and brightest overachievers):
- Captain / project manager / leader
- 2nd in command
- Pilot (for getting to the planet via interstellar travel and for scouting out the planet's surface)
- Botanist / biologist
- Chemist?? Required??
- Engineer / instrumentation tech (Who can repair both regular computers and AI)
- Doctor
I'm also looking for one role that is sort of maybe not needed, but that isn't blatently pointless. I was thinking physicist or security officer.
Thoughts?