Reading with Style discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Archives
>
FA 2015 10.4 Math
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Kate S
(new)
Aug 27, 2015 12:11AM
In honor of the back to school season, let's take a math lesson: Read a book with a number in the title, which can be in either numeric form or spelled out. Ordinals, such as first, 2nd, etc. do not qualify.
reply
|
flag
Would a title such as A Thousand Splendid Suns or A Thousand Acres qualify? Wondering about the "a" in front of the word "thousand".
What about numbers like "sixteenth": The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-century Miller
Joanna wrote: "What about numbers like "sixteenth": The Cheese and the Worms: The Cosmos of a Sixteenth-century Miller"No, sorry, ordinals (n-th) do not work for this task.
Jayme(the ghost reader) wrote: "so 4th of July wouldn't work?"No, sorry, that book doesn't work for this one.
Just putting it out there, but if you were going to read Christie for 10.2, there are quite a number (see what I did there, ;) ) that have numbers in the title. Most are not shelved as YA Assignment, and all get Oldies points.Even better, at least a couple qualify for 10.3.
But that's all I am saying!
Amanda wrote: "Just putting it out there, but if you were going to read Christie for 10.2, there are quite a number (see what I did there, ;) ) that have numbers in the title. Most are not shelved as YA Assignmen..."Thanks for the heads-up! I love to get all the Combo and Style points. :-)
Ok, I'm just wanting to make sure all these forms of numbers will fit the task1776
Lean Mean Thirteen
The No. 1 Ladies' Detective Agency
11/22/63
King Henry V
Rebekah wrote: "Ok, I'm just wanting to make sure all these forms of numbers will fit the task1776
Lean Mean Thirteen
The No. 1 Ladies' Detective Agency
[book:11/22/63|1064493..."
Yes, all of those work! The No. 1 Detective Agency works only as that title, not all of those that are in the series by the same name.
Cory Day wrote: "How about Roman numerals (like Night of Flames: A Novel of World War II)?"Yes, those represent the number and are acceptable. (But can you imagine having to do your multiplication tables in Roman times?)
Rachelccameron wrote: "Wouldn't King Henry V technically be King Henry the Fifth?"V in Roman Numerals is 5. I don't recall enough Latin (if we ever covered it) to know if the Romans had ordinals.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Slaughterhouse-Five (other topics)Slaughterhouse-Five (other topics)
Black Vodka: Ten Stories (other topics)
Black Vodka: Ten Stories (other topics)
Night of Flames (other topics)
More...






