Zombies! discussion

This topic is about
Shattered Hourglass
Buddy Reads
>
Day by Day Armageddon #3
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Yammy
(new)
-
rated it 2 stars
Feb 24, 2014 05:40PM

reply
|
flag



***DISCLAIMER: Nothing in this post is meant to offend. It is for entertainment purposes only! :-)***
~Teresa~

Anyone else noticing this? is it distracting or bothersome?


Anyone else noticing this? is it distractin..."
It took me a while to get used to it but I did. I liked the new characters introduced - and there was no way to follow new characters separate stories through Kill's journal entries - so I gave it a couple of chapters and I forgot about it. Also it does switch back into the journal entry format more later in the book when telling Kill's story.

Teresa you may not even want to bother with this one. If you thought the last two were military centric this one will bore you to tears. The military terms etc are about twice what they were in the previous books. I love it but I know it gets old for some readers.


the tone has changed so much that it is a little jarring. am i reading a Tom Clancy book now all of a sudden? with the special forces missions and multiple locations, things are feeling rushed and details are lacking. he's cramming too much story into one book.
none of this would bother me so much if i didn't just read the first two books back-to-back but since i did, well, this just feels like too much of a change.
is it a bad book? no. it is it as good as the first one? eh... not so much.

*I don't think that's their name but I was too lazy to look it up. I knew it was closer to it than Project Six, which kind of gives the impression that Tim Gunn would be involved, encouraging them to make it work.

it was like a Tom Clancy military porn novel... with zombies. he tried to do a lot with this book (cram too much info into one book) and it just didn't work.
having been such a fan of the first two, I was really let down by this one. don't get me wrong, the action scenes were great and all but i didn't really connect with anybody so i couldn't care less.
the somewhat conspiracy aspect was silly to me as well.
i won't be reading the next book.

I did like some of the military characters, like the guys who went on the island (although I thought it was a stupid mission). I wasn't overly invested with them like I was with our original core group of characters though.
If he wants to get away from the journal format, I wouldn't mind seeing more from John's perspective. That could be interesting. I'd also like to see more of Dean. I think she's an interesting character and I'd like to see her utilized more.



I do think he's a good author and I hope he'll continue the story--but with the focus back on the characters we're really interested in. New characters are fine but they shouldn't turn our "real" characters into mere backstory.


Mike, talk away. Teresa still needs to catch up, as do I ... I haven't started the book yet, but will today. Don't worry about spoilers....spoiler-free readers should stay out of this thread, since there's no reading schedule for this book, just a shoot-from-the-hip discussion.

To be honest, Mike, I never did really grasp what that whole thing was supposed to be. I didn't really care that much so I didn't try too hard to figure it out. Your explanation makes as much sense as any and certainly more than I was able to guess at.
Personally, I wish he'd just avoided that whole part and sent them into China after a vaccine or something like that, rather than trying to come up with some explanation--especially that one.
I know some people really like to know what caused the whole zombie uprising. I'm in the group that doesn't really much care and would rather read about how they're dealing with it.

The whole ending confused the crap out of me. (view spoiler)

the point is, the cause of the outbreak shouldn't matter but the author tried so hard to make it matter.