Goodreads Authors/Readers discussion
Fantasy
>
What do you look for when you pick up a fantasy/sci-fi book?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
S.
(new)
Aug 10, 2015 03:42PM

reply
|
flag

Sarina Rose,
The Relentless Brit
Vintage Romance
Conflict sets the pace
Romance rules the Day
Sarina Rose
Smashwords.com - Promotional price: $0.99
Coupon Code: XA44V
Expires: August 15, 2015

I like philosophy or a message, provided the author doesn't beat the reader on the head with it.
As for fantasy, I prefer Sword and Sorcery to High Fantasy, so my likes are pretty much the same as for SF, exchanging magic or creatively different worlds and societies, but with well written combat.




I also enjoy books with a speculative or philosophical message (particularly in sci-fi) but I still enjoy a traditional high fantasy, swords/sorcery find-the-magic-thing-that-saves-the-world trilogy if the characters make believable choices and not just ones to advance the plot.

Have you read the Wheel of Time? I'm referencing its pace in lieu of your comment.

What about moral concepts? Such as, say, utilitarianism?

I also tend to find the choice of words and dialogue in fantasy quite important. I sometimes wonder why it's not so in cases of sci-fi... Care to share your thoughts?

Not yet but the The Merchant of DeathThe Pilgrims of RayneThe Never WarThe Rivers of Zadaa(Pendragon Series) suit my criteria.

I don't want to read a course about why the lake is purple or gold or how the spaceship disposes of wastes. I want to be pulled in the story and if the characters can show me their world doing so, that's a bonus I will gladly take.

What about moral concepts? Such as, say, utilitarianism?"
Not so much. I'm a Recovered Catholic who finds some of my religious sanity in books such as Kurtz's Adept series and Harkness' A Discovery of Witches.
The more I think about it, the fantasy writers I enjoy are female writers who focus their writing on the emotional discovery within very NonCatholic religious spheres such as Masonry, witches, and sentient gargoyles.

That said, if the author wants to include appendices with details on the nuts and bolts or trees in the back matter, all well and good.

Note: Listed in alphabetical order by author, not preference.
Science Fiction
Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury
The Martian Chronicles by Ray Bradbury
Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card
The Hunger Games Trilogy by Suzanne Collins
Lord of the Flies by William Golding
Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro
Dust by Charles Pellegrino
The Inverted World by Christopher Priest
Fantasy
The Stolen Child by Keith Donohue
The Dark Tower 7-book series by Stephen King
The Harry Potter 7-book series by J.K. Rowling
The Hobbit by J.R.R. Tolkien
The Lord of the Rings Trilogy by J.R.R. Tolkien
The Simarillion by J.R.R. Toliien

I'm not particular about said rules, mind you, as long as they fit and that the author sticks to them. I remember feeling rather miffed when I read The Paper Magician books (the first two--I didn't bother with the third) because one essential rule got very easily broken by the 17-something heroine. It made me go all "wait, the way to break this rule was SO easy, and NOBODY else figured it out in centuries? Impossible!" Suspension of disbelief going down the drain at Mach 1 here.
So, yes. Basically, I'll expect as much as from any other book, "keeping me entertained" included, with the additional yoke of world-building. Whether it's sword & sorcery fantasy or hard science fiction.

Note: Listed ..."
I haven't read all of those books listed, but I read most of them, and it seems to me that all those I can recognize - which I consider significant contributions to literature -have the same element of a 'golden idea' that makes you think after turning the last page and closing the book from the other side.


I think I've become more critical of other authors' styles since I've tried taking up the mantle of writing myself.
But as for medieval fantasy, I expect the dialogue to sound reminiscent of the period without being tedious. George R. R. Martin does a fantastic job of this. And yet there are others who can still convey a realistic medieval setting while using more modern dialect.
In sci-fi, I think we don't imagine that our vocabulary will change all that much in the future, even though it is changing all the time.


Yet it always interests me to know what people who aren't into the subgenre to share their thoughts about books I wrote or am a fan of. It makes me see things I previously ignored.

N..."
S.,
Thank you for your analysis. I agree and could not have said it better myself. I have always shamelessly admitted that a few of my best ideas have come from others.

I like a good pacing to a story and characters you want to love or hate. The storyteller is doing a good job if you hate a villain in your gut.
Morality, philosophy, and politics are fine if they are part of the story, not THE story. I don't want to be preached to or scolded at in story format.

I like a good pacing to a story and characters you want to love or hate. The storyteller is doing a good job if you hate a villain in y..."
What makes you find a story 'well paced'?

Tastes may vary, but for me 'Well paced' means the story more or less flows along without getting bogged down too much descriptive minutiae. If something in particular needs a description, that is fine, but certainly not everything has such a need.


So you look for the non-fiction issues within a fiction setting? I'll remember this comment well. It summarizes my inclination well.


I think that's a good way to phrase it:) and also philosophical? does it change the way I look at something? question something, about myself or the world in a good way:)
in anthropology, I learned that we tell stories to ourselves, by ourselves, about ourselves, for ourselves...so- what does the story I am "telling", by reading,.. do for me?
I suppose really good writing could be one way to bypass(?) r3eincarnation.... by having the ability to step into someone else's shoes for a moment..
just recently, I was reading a story, for review, where one of the characters had been a street-kid...I really didn't feel like the aspect of what it MIGHT be like, to live that kind of distrustful life, was portrayed very well. But, it got me to start thinking- while I was reading the story-- about how a street-kid WOULD be/ react/ talk in each situation: untrusting, not forth-coming, not making strong connections or bonds, etc... and trying to understand WHY...what the world must feel like to that person...and also, as a writer, how much RICHER the story would have been, written truer to that reality:)

Books mentioned in this topic
The Merchant of Death (other topics)The Pilgrims of Rayne (other topics)
The Never War (other topics)
The Rivers of Zadaa (other topics)