Science Fiction Aficionados discussion

This topic is about
The Puppet Masters
Monthly Read: Member Picks
>
Puppet Masters - Mike the Paladin's Pick
date
newest »


There was a movie attempt at this book, didn't go well as often happens. Too bad. This actually works as science fiction, science/urban fantasy and also horror. It's one of my favorites.



I find all the dated science pictured interesting. It's supposed to be 2007 and they're talking about "tubes" in the electronics and everyone still smokes, TV is still broadcast only. Interesting.



I really love the section where the narrator is under control (I don't consider that a spoiler, it's in the blurb on the back of the book). How neat is it to write about mind control from the inside?

Re: The male-female aspect. He was willing to die for his woman. I'm not complaining. Reminds me of a Country and Western song popular a year ago. "I'd die for her and she lives for me."

Personal computers weren't pictured. TV was assumed to be "stereo-vision" but it was still imagined to bo hooked to line of sight links (back in the 1970s I was film director at a small TV station. We were an NBC affiliate and had to receive the network broadcasts through microwave transmission.) No pads or other electronic media. To buy a newspaper you went to a vending machine and paid for your paper to be printed there. He mentions transistors and even tubes...
I found all that very interesting "atop" the story.


Fortunately the story quickly matured and basically became unputdownable. For a long time, you can't tell whether or not the ending is going to be good or bad. Thirty pages from the end, the alien slugs can still win. Heinlein really is a great story teller.
Now here is the funny thing: whenever sci-fi writers look into the future, the tend to expand on the technology of their day in a linear fashion. Heinlein sees ray guns and flying cars and spaceships to Venus (none of which presently exist) and the stereoscope (3D TV). Like many after him, he completely misses all that is digital. He also assumes that the culture of the future would be more or less as it was in 1940. Sam Nivens talks like the hero in a 1950s spy thriller. So does the Old Man. And although Mary starts out rough and tough, she ends up the quintessential babe supporting her man.
Having said that, I loved it and will gladly read it again. Gave it four stars.
My favourite Heinlein will always be Citizen of the Galaxy because it got me hooked on sci-fi.

I agree. Didn't really think about it until I read your comment. It was interesting when (view spoiler)

Edwin, have you ever read Heinlein's Starman Jones? It's a universe of star travel where astrogators do computations manually and you have several to 'check" each other as one error could lose you in deep space with no reference point as to where you are.
The astrogators are a guild and have many volumes of secret books.
Also there's When Wolrds Collide and After Worlds Collide.
When Worlds Collide (this edition has both books in one volume).
In those books (written in the 1930s) there is another planet on a collision course with Earth. An expedition is formed to a different planet (that will fall into earth's orbit).
For details read the book, LOL.
Anyway you get the tech of the time with people trying to save books and so on. You might enjoy both.

Edwin, have you ever read Heinlein's Starman Jones? It's a universe of star travel where astrogators do computations manually and you have several to 'chec..."
Thanks! Starman Jones sounds like fun. My earliest Heinlein so far was Space Cadet.
The basic premise of When worlds collide sounds a bit like Asimov's Nemesis. And have you read Neal Stephenson's Seveneves? Similar idea: the moon is struck by an unknown something (the Agent), Earth is doomed but it will take a couple of years, so humanity has time to save some part of itself.

Books mentioned in this topic
Starman Jones (other topics)Space Cadet (other topics)
Nemesis (other topics)
Seveneves (other topics)
Starman Jones (other topics)
More...
It's a Heinlein I actually haven't read, so I'm looking forward to it. Preliminary thoughts? Mike, why did this one grab your attention as a potential read?