European Royalty discussion
European Royalty Discussions
>
What have you read lately?

Misfit - you read Scott's other novels? I loved all 3 and was very excited for this one - but it sucks :(
I'm damn near finished now, and it still hasn't gotten any better. I think the character is part of the problem, but it really sucks all the way around.

Misfit - you read Scott's other novels? I loved all 3 and was very excited for this one - but it sucks :(
I'm damn near finished now, and it still hasn't gotten any b..."
Mandy, no I haven't and I'm not sure I want to after my impressions with this one.

Not the most amazing books out there, but really fun, entertaining books. I actually really liked a couple of them.
I just checked my ratings - The Kings Favorite (about Nell Gwyn) only got 3 stars, but Royal Harlot (about Barbara Villiers) got 5 and The Duchess got 4.
Try them out. For you it's not big deal! 3 books is like a 3 day time commitment, right?
lol
Finished The French Mistress.
Meh.
It never got good. I'm giving it 2 stars.
Started Sunne in Splendor yesterday!
I'm only about 40 pages in but I'm already loving it.
I'm so excited about this one :)

I started Murder Most Royalby Plaidy and I've liked it so far.

I started Murder Most Royalby Plaidy and..."
I thought Murder Most Royal was excellent, but I had the same problem with the de Medici books as far as the portrayal of Catherine went. I think it's a matter of the research having become dated.

I have not read the Isabella and Ferdinand series but did read the 3 vol set of Katherine of Aragon by Plaidy. I also read To Hold the Crown by Plaidy that is about Henry VII and Elizabeth. Towards the end of the book gets to Katherine coming from Spain and marrying and all, so these overlap some but not enough to make reading them together repetative.

The Sword of Truth This one is a christian historical set in the time of Henry VIII. It deals with the religious reform and the main characters involvment with Will Tyndale in getting the bible published in English.
Edward VI The Lost King of England This one is a non fiction about Edward VI.
Just started Jean Plaidys Plantagenet Prelude ...which so far is Very good.


I started [book:Murder Most Royal|114937..."
Susan, have you ever tried to read some French authors who wrote about Catherine? I recently read La Saga des Médicis, Tome 1 : Contessina by Sarah Frydman and La Cour des Dames, Tome 1 : La Régente Noire by Franck Ferrand.

Not the most amazing books out there, but really fun, entertaining books. I actually really liked a couple of them.
I just checked my ratings - The Kings Favorit..."
Love Sunne in Splendour! My first SKP - simply wonderful!

I started Murder Most Royalby Plaidy and..."
I thought the books got better as they went along, but I agree that they dragged at points (especially scenes with Henri and Diane). I think Plaidy easily could have gotten away with two books instead of three.

I didn't turn the light out until 3:30am and I was done with the book. I couldn't put it down!

I'm the same way with any EC book, I seem to devour them rather then slowly reading them.



Her next novel, To Defy a King is about Marshal's daughter (Mahelt I think the name is) and I believe she's married to one of Roger and Ida's sons. Out next spring. Can't wait.


I ordered this book on-line a few days ago and couldn't for the life of me remember why - it didn't seem to be a group read for any of the groups I'm in. I think I ordered it because of all the positive reviews from this group! Now I'm excited to find time to fit it in with my other readings! Thanks, all!

Where should I start?
I'm currently reading Sunne in Splendour and loving it. It's wonderful, of course.
I'm also reading Elizabeth Woodville by David Baldwin, very good so far!


Where should I start?
I'm currently reading Sunne in Splendour and loving it. It's wonderful, of course.
I'm ..."
Mandy, Chadwick's older novels are based on fictional characters and to some readers have a bit of a historical romance feel to them (but I love a good romance). Her newer books are based on historical characters, i.e. the Marshal and Bigod families. The Greatest Knight is just out in the US otherwise you have to go to the UK or Canada to get them.
There are libraries in the US with her books (I know mine has several of her titles). I've got a Listmania on her books on Amazon that should give you a good feel for what might interest you, http://www.amazon.com/Medieval-Fictio...



I'm about halfway through The Sunne in Splendour.
I'm loving it, but...
I'm a little disappointed in the portrayal of Elizabeth and her family. It seems so shallow. Part of that is because I'm reading a biography of Elizabeth Woodville, too, I'm sure. I'm also instinctively sympathetic to women who have been demonized by history...I just doubt that they could have been THAT bad, kwim?
Still, it seems very out of character for SKP to write a character so one-dimensional. This is the woman that challenged history's view of King John, yet for Elizabeth Woodville she seems to have no sympathy. It bothers me a bit. Did anyone else feel that way?

Now I'm reading The Thistle and the Rose by Jean Plaidy


This was one of the first historical fictions I read, maybe 20 years ago, and it gave me a push toward writing my own historical fiction. Good book.


Now I'm reading Mary Tudor The First Queen by Linda Porter. I've liked it so far.

Sounds interesting! I'd say ancient royalty counts - we're pretty flexible here. :)

Sounds interesting! I'd say..."
I'll post a review to my Goodreads page when I finish it.


Next I'm starting Innocent Traitor.

Next I'm starting Innocent Traitor."
I really liked both the books you mentioned, Tisha. Hope you enjoy Innocent Traitor.


It's slow going, its written in the present tense and hard to get into. I'm finding it's better taken in small doses. I think Tanzanite's having the same issues. Time will tell.




I don't know the reason for it, but based on what I've read, it does seem like it was pretty common for royalty not to see their children after they got married and moved away. Maybe they were just too busy in their own countries, or maybe the traveling was too difficult or dangerous.
Also, I think royal children were expected to have their own households, so maybe it was just accepted that they really didn't see their children.

With the case of her two daughters by Louis, Eleanor wasn't allowed by her ex-husband to see them. Because it was a fairly ugly divorce.
And traveling was not exceptionally easy, and a king or queen would generally travel in state, which made it much more complicated.

As you probably know, having your children brought up in other people's households was common amongst the aristocracy anyway, the idea being that you went to a grander household and learned to be a squire or a lady in waiting or whatever. Or just to increase the chances of a good marriage of course - marriage being alliances of families rather than a 'falling in love , tho no doubt some of them did. Even quite modest families would have to send daughters away to marry, and become part of the husbands family thereafter, if only the in the next village ( much like a lot of the world today , outside the industrialised nations really)
The idea of a nuclear family, with close everyday ties is a much more modern one, belonging to our era of cities and easier transport.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Book of Royal Useless Information: A Funny and Irreverent Look at the British Royal Family Past and Present (other topics)Katherine (other topics)
Queen of the North (other topics)
Victoria and her daughters (other topics)
The Heir Apparent: A Life of Edward VII, the Playboy Prince (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Noel Botham, Bruce Montague (other topics)Alison Weir (other topics)
Alison Weir (other topics)
Alison Weir (other topics)
Jean Plaidy (other topics)
More...
It's slow moving at the beginning - I'm about 150 pages in and it's still kind of blah.
I H..."
Glad to know I'm not alone everyone just gushes over that one. I thought the first person POV really hemmed the story in and it got quite dull when she's recapping a bunch of stuff she couldn't have been involved in first hand. Definitely a library book.