Lord of the Rings Read-Along discussion
General LotR Discussions
>
Characters only in the book
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Hika86
(new)
Feb 09, 2014 05:40AM

reply
|
flag
*

I miss Glorfindel too, though. I understand that they wanted to give Arwen a bigger part in the movie, and I agree with that, as LotR in general is sadly devoid of female characters. But I also think the habit of turning female characters into warriors to make them "strong" is kind of insulting (and something that Peter Jackson seems to have a habit of doing), and I would rather have seen her as Arwen instead of a weird Glorfindel stand-in.

I feel like Glorfindel and Elladan/Elrohir could have at least made it into the movie for some sort of extended edition shenanigans, though, since I understand why they were left out of their canon roles. Maybe I'm biased because I have a weakness for cute twins and Elrond's entire family, but even Lindir has like, 3-4 whole lines, come on.

I was always super interested in all of them from when I first read the books and I was pretty disappointed when they didn't make it into the movies. (I don't really count Lindir as being in the movie, as in the LotR movies he's just an unnamed background elf and you don't actually find out his name until they shout him out in The Hobbit.)
But Elrond's sons - along with Glorfindel - were always fascinating to me; it seems like Tolkien goes out of his way to depict the elves as gentle and wise and all that and I always loved the warrior elves that we get to see. It really gives you a good indication of how dangerous they can be, particularly an elf lord like Glorfindel.
And the RANGERS! It would take me years and years to talk about how amazing and wonderful I find the Rangers. I wish there was more about them in everything all the time. I have a lot of ~feelings about them. Almost as many as I have about the Rohirrim, but I'll wait and scream about them when we actually get to them in the books...

Don't get me started on movie!Arwen, I hated almost everything about what PJ did with her.
I can understand leaving Tom Bombadil out -- in fact his presence in the narrative is kind of odd, since he doesn't seem to serve any purpose. The hobbits don't learn anything useful from him, nor does he give them anything useful for their journey. Sure, he rescues them, but you could also argue that the Barrow-wights didn't really serve any narrative purpose. They both add a lot of color and dimension, and bestow a sense of the long and epic history of Middle-Earth though; maybe that's their purpose.

Yes!! The deep friendship among them is just wonderful; he's not just their king in exile, he's family.
nancy anna wrote: "The council must have gone on for hours and hours!..."
Certainly long enough for the hobbits to get hungry -- although to be honest that's not saying much ;)
I love the whole council chapter, the thought of all these people gathering together from near and far, all the races represented, to share everything they know and plan how to save their world.


Also, was Quickbeam in the movie? Because he was pretty cool but it probably would have been a bit expensive to do more than one main Ent interacting with Merry and Pippin. Too bad, I really loved his elegy for the trees and being able to get the perspective of a younger, faster Ent!
Who else have we met that the movies missed? Anybody else an Erkenbrand fan or a Quickbeam fan?



The first movie left out Frodo and co. visiting Farmer Maggot's house, but it did show Farmer Maggot and a few other hobbits chasing Pippin and Merry, and then also Frodo and Sam through the cornfield and into a ravine. In the movie, Pippin and Merry had stolen some carrots and other veggies from Farmer Maggot's farm.