Go Set a Watchman
discussion
frustrated over comparison to Austen
date
newest »


Here's another similarity: they were both masters of foreshadowing through dialogue and character. I'm thinking specifically of the banter at Netherfield and Scout's first day of school. Look at the debate over Bingley's character and consider what actually happens. Look at the names of the kids and how they act in that classroom. Awesome stuff!
So yes, the comparison is apt, and Harper Lee would have been proud of it.

I also liked what you said about Lee and Austen both commenting on their respective societies. So true and a very apt comparison indeed. I still like comparing Lee to Salinger as well.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Go Set a Watchman (other topics)
Go Set a Watchman (other topics)
Books mentioned in this topic
To Kill a Mockingbird (other topics)Go Set a Watchman (other topics)
Go Set a Watchman (other topics)
I'm frustrated though at all the articles comparing Ms. Lee to Jane Austen. It rings untrue and sexist to me. As if these journalists are merely reaching for another famous "female" author with whom they can compare Ms. Lee. Why? Can she not be compared to a man? Would she not hold up? Ms. Austen is an exquisite writer. I love all six of her novels. But here's the thing. Ms. Lee only wrote two novels, which were published decades apart. Ms. Austen published her novels in rapid succession (two were published posthumously).
I think Ms. Lee is more like J.D. Salinger than Jane Austen. They are both Americans. They both wrote novels involving adolescents dealing with large themes. And after the wild success of their debut novels, they both withdrew from public life. Why not draw that comparison print journalists?