Outread Aubrey! Challenge discussion
SPRINT: Dystopian (2/1-2/28)
message 51:
by
Morgan
(new)
Feb 10, 2014 05:38AM

reply
|
flag

@Morgan: Hunger Games was borderline for me too.
Finnick didn't really bother me too much. Well, actually, he would have at first if I didn't know his back story in advance. The bit about what he was forced to do is actually what made me comfortable with his character though. Probably because I've done a lot of reading about human trafficking and his personality was really quite accurate to how a sex trafficked victim might behave in his situation. So, yes, I actually kind of like him.

Gah. Yes. Johanna's two strip scenes were my least favorite parts of the book. And they're not really even in keeping with the way the author portrays her character the rest of the series.

I want to read Amanda Davis's books, but I'm not sure about the price. The first one is eight dollars on kindle, and I would rather not pay more than three for a kindle book.
I have Amanda Davis's first book on Kindle (haven't read it yet--thanks for reminding me!). Let me check if it's a book the publish allows to be loaned via Kindle... Aha! Yes, I can loan Precisely Terminated once to one person for 14 days. I won't be reading it in the next 14 days, so if somebody here (Morgan?) wants to take a loan via Kindle, I'd be happy to help.
Ahh, I see, in regards to The Hunger Games. I liked the movies better (partially because they dialed back on some of the content), but I'll still make an effort to finish the books.
Ahh, I see, in regards to The Hunger Games. I liked the movies better (partially because they dialed back on some of the content), but I'll still make an effort to finish the books.

My mom is supposed to be picking up a couple library books for me, and I do have several projects to do this week, so I'll have to see if I have time. Thanks for the offer, though!
I'm listening to Red Rain again while working on a dress for my sister. This is the first time this year, so I guess it counts. :)
Why yes, it does count. :D
Yeah, Divergent wasn't anything I could "handle," but I can't say I fully enjoyed it for those reasons... Really a mixed bag, that book!
Yeah, Divergent wasn't anything I could "handle," but I can't say I fully enjoyed it for those reasons... Really a mixed bag, that book!

That WAS kind of OOC for Johanna, now that you mention it! Kind of disappointed to hear that they didn't keep Peeta's lines (I thought they were kind of sweet ... to the Capitol, you're pure, but perfect for me ...) Do they just say they were doing it to mess with Katniss then? Thinking about it now, they didn't bring up her modesty in the first movie, so maybe they decided it wasn't needed/important.
Since they literally were just sleeping, I could kind of tolerate it a bit more, considering the horrors they went through, but IRL, I would say a huge "no" also. Peeta was also seriously tempting fate, I think, considering that he's been " in love" with her for practically his whole life ... But his restraint made me love him even more. How realistic that is, I don't know ...
Haha, he is also my favorite HG character. :)
First come first served, so have at it! I need your email again, though. Didn't bother to save that PM... ;-P




(I also know far too many people who ship Johanna/Katniss. I may be one of them. I'm still on the fence about it, and need to reread the rest of the books.)




You're welcome to it, Annie. ;) Let me know what your mom says. (And excuse me if I don't lend it right away. I have a busy week coming up so I might not get on too much.)

I reread Catching Fire and now I'm on Mockingjay. I also ordered Insurgent, but I'll probably need to reread Divergent first because I've forgotten what happens.
*actually owns Insurgent and still hasn't read it yet* Hence this challenge, yah..


Dystopia is weird. It's so dark and often depressing yet, particularly in the case of YA dystopia, makes for such great escapism, don't you think?



@Miriam: I find the sometimes depressing nature of Dystopian very interesting. Especially in light of it's current popularity.

Good points about dystopians ... Maybe it has something to do with how scifi has been getting a bit darker since the 1990s (e.g. Star Trek, Star Wars novels, the reimagined Battlestar Galactic series vs. the original 1970s series, etc.)?
@Miriam -- Thanks for your comment on Divergent. I've heard different things about those books ... But I'll probably give it a shot, at least before I watch the movie. ;)

I think also it plays on a lot of fears that people have -- fear of the government, fear of climate change, fear of technology taking over. All the privacy scandals, the corruption, the human rights abuse, and the flooding/snow/drought (delete as appropriate according to location) means all of that seems very close to home. But the thing about dystopian fiction as that it's often about taking on the system and beating it, so I think it gives us hope that we don't have to be trapped by our circumstances. If our government is corrupt, overthrow it. If people are being beaten down for who they are, save them, stand up for them. If the weather is destroying us, fight back...


What would an official definition of dystopian be, though? If it's just fighting back against an evil government, then Star Wars would qualify.

Ooh, ooh! Lemme answer this question! I know I wrote an article about this. Where in the hay did it go? Oh, here. Skip down to the section that says "What would a fallen society look like?" if you don't have time to read the whole thing: http://www.holyworlds.org/blog/?p=1325
I appreciated the comment on my review, Miriam. It's nice to have comments of substance. :)
I appreciated the comment on my review, Miriam. It's nice to have comments of substance. :)


Aubrey, I guess that's why I like dystopian, the political side. Genres can be confusing, though, since some stories seem to fit into multiple ones.

Wow. Glad you liked it so much, Annie. Since I wasn't a big fan, it's great that you made the money I spent on it worth it. ;) <3
I'm with you, Morgan! I love the political angle.
Interestingly, I rarely find dystopian depressing when I read it. What I find depressing is when I look at the real world and see the same signs. Of course, a lot of dystopian is intentionally exaggerated/fantasized--that's the point of the genre--but the principle is there.
Interestingly, I rarely find dystopian depressing when I read it. What I find depressing is when I look at the real world and see the same signs. Of course, a lot of dystopian is intentionally exaggerated/fantasized--that's the point of the genre--but the principle is there.

Sorry if I sound snappish. I just woke up after staying up too latr last night reading Insurgent. But really...

The balance of our ecosystem is a very delicate thing. We have documented evidence of volcano eruptions causing worldwide famine, because the volcanic dust prevented enough sunlight from filtering in. It's pretty easy to imagine some other catasrophe, likely or unlikely (such as an asteroid knocking the moon out of orbit) that would also result in similar devastation.
When I get confused on what is dystopia and what isn't (moving on from science, now, ) I look at the two scifi novels I have written. They both feature corrupt governments, but one is a dystopia and one isn't. The difference is that the dystopian government has the appearance of perfection, but is rotten underneath. The second one is just plain corrupt in the everyone-knows-it sort of way. Defining dystopian is as tricky as defining superhero stories, I think, and we once debated the latter for the most part of a month. It's almost impossible to define, because it's more of a stylistic thing than a plot thing. But you also know it when you see it...

Same here, Aubrey. But I can usually tell how the mood could feel depressing to a lot of people.

There are cycles, in the 70s people thought that it would be so cold we couldn't grow food, in the past decade people thought it would be so hot the world would burn, and now, due to a decrease in sunspot activity, in Georgia we have had several snowstorms. I wouldn't consider volcanic eruptions causing things like the year without a summer to be climate change. That's a natural disaster. Climate change would be saying Florida will go from being semi tropical to having winters where they regularly get temperatures below zero and feet of snow with no disaster causing it.
Miriam, just because South England is under water does not mean the climate is changing. It means there are floods.
Ultimately, though, I think it comes down to a definition of terms. If by climate change you mean natural disasters which cause weather not quite typical to the area, yes it happens. If you mean random changes like from tropical to arctic with no disaster to set it off, then no it doesn't.
Books mentioned in this topic
Swipe (other topics)The World of the Hunger Games (other topics)
Among the Betrayed (other topics)
Among the Hidden (other topics)
Among the Barons (other topics)
More...