Book Haven discussion
General
>
Do you prefer novels to have a happy ending?


But sometimes they're devastating :(






Totally agree - which is why I avoid reading romances.

I suppose I mean one that gives hope for the future, where good wins over bad. A friend told me she'd never read a book that didn't end happily, which is what got me thinking about the issue.




My beta reader read a romance once where the hero got shot two chapters from the end. It totally ruined it for her. If there isn't an HEA, then it shouldn't be labeled a romance.



Romance is my favourite, but I like - believable. By stating that a story is traditional / non-traditional, takes away the element of surprise, happy or sad. Though I understand people want to know prior to reading. Does it make a difference if reader is aware of a sequel? The promise of more.
I enjoy the non-traditional if there is a good reason for departure and the promise of more. If it is a stand-alone book, I would prefer a traditional happy. :O)
It depends greatly on the novel.
For me, it depends greatly on the genre of the book, if it's a thriller or a mystery, then I don't necessarily expect a happy ending. So if the book doesn't end well, I don't mind it so much. However, if I'm reading a romance, then I am expecting a happy ending so if I don't get one, then I can be quite gutted.
I remember reading a historical romance novel where the hero died at the end, and I sat there looking at the book with an expression of "What the....??" on my face for at least 10 minutes.
I remember reading a historical romance novel where the hero died at the end, and I sat there looking at the book with an expression of "What the....??" on my face for at least 10 minutes.



Today we live in a world where stories are given stereotypical Hollywood-style "lovey dovey" endings. And for the most part, it can potentially ruin the book. Hollywood is boring, clichéd and outdated. In my eyes.
Books which leave the reader hanging in deep thought, a cliffhanger where the possible endings are only limited by the reader's imagination, in my opinion, engages more interest in the book. It prompts readers and fans to discuss the book in social circles and theorise possible endings. Those social circles will catch the interest of other readers, who may purchase the book to check it out for themselves. Humans, being very curious creatures who since the beginning of time seem to enjoy asking endless questions, will then want to buy the author's next book for the next mysterious ending.
Other than those, I also enjoy books which do not have a happy ending. After all, real life isn't all butterflies and roses. In this era we are suffering the effects of recession, debt, social change and the threat of constant war. Books which reflect on these will most likely reach out to the readers more, because they have some sense of the current real-life world enclosed within them, helping the reader to actually feel "in the story".
In books and movies, generally, the hero saves the world in the end and gets the girl. Or the stereotypically stressed office clerk finds the love of her life in unusual circumstances and lives happily ever after. Same old, same old. Yawn.
Kill them off in the end. End the world. Give humankind no hope for survival. This is what people want to read these days, according to the readers that I have spoken to. Dystopia novels are the ones topping the charts right now - Hunger Games, Divergent Trilogy... even Orwell's 1984 and Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451 are picking up the sales again.
As for a romance that doesn't end happily, other than Romeo & Juliet which everyone knows, - look at the ORIGINAL 'The Little Mermaid' by Hans Christian Andersen, before Walt Disney got his hands on it and before Hans' editors changed the ending to make it "less traumatic for children". In the original version the mermaid found it excruciatingly painful to walk on her new legs and her tongue was cut out (in exchange for the legs because she had a beautiful voice) so she couldn't talk. The prince ends up marrying someone else instead of her, so she is given a knife to kill him with. But she doesn't go through with it and commits suicide.
Conclusion
Happy endings: Cliché. Boring. Usually unrealistic.
Cliffhangers: Thought provoking. Gets people talking about the book.
Unhappy endings: Uncommon but not cliché. Unexpected shock value. More likely to be realistic.
-- Scott A. Butler


Real life happens and not everything has a happy ending. I book that always has a happy ending is too predictable to me. I like when books are a bit sad, but not exceedingly gory or depressing. I couldn't get past 50 pages of Lovely Bones because of the gruesome plot.
I just read Patron Saint of Liars and I loved it even though it did not have a happy ending and I did not "like" the main character. It was well-written, deep and I the other characters made the book a good one.
I think it's pretty ridiculous to expect every book you read to have a happy ending. I don't need to author to tie up every loose end and make everyone happy, it's just not always realistic.



To me, it completely depends on the book itself. I love endings that make me think, and many of those are unhappy. If it's an ending that makes sense to the story, it doesn't matter if it's happy or not.

For other genres, its kind of up to the story and what constitutes and happy ending. It's not a book, but for those who saw Gravity, was that a happy ending? (view spoiler) I was satisfied. Anything else would have seemed forced/dishonest.


I prefer novels to be realistic and believable. If all turns out well in the end, that's fine; as long as the circumstances leading up to the happy ending are not contrived or unbelievable. I personally do not believe in miracles.


I do want endings to have a decent amount of resolution though, or else I will end up feeling really unsatisfied.
One of my favorite authors was the ancient Greek playwright Euripides. He made a point against forced happy endings by digging his characters into real, seriously dangerous and thought-provoking situations, and then purposefully ruining it all by utilizing a "deus ex machina" (literally a god appearig out of nowhere to make everything right again) that completely resolved the conflict within a couple of pages. An excellent stance against forced happy endings.


For example, I HATED the ending of Twilight. It built up to this big thing, then deteriorated, like air slowly being let out of a balloon...
Then again, I don't like practically all my favorite characters dying either. Like Harry Potter -.- Don't get me wrong, the ending was good overall. There was just a little too much death.


http://www.maggiejamesfiction.com/blo...



Yes, I think the ending has to be the one that has grown naturally out of the characters and their experiences...
At the end of Knut Hamsun's HUNGER, he abruptly gets a job on a boat and leaves Christiania...in a way, this is a triumph as he is escaping the place where he was so miserable, but the reader perhaps doubts that he is going to necessarily have an easier life at sea.



I like how you said that Jessica. I feel the same way and need the diversity. Whether it's happy or sad, I also like true ending where the author lets the readers know whats happened to the characters.

Authors mentioned in this topic
Scott A. Butler (other topics)Maggie James (other topics)
Maggie James