The Agatha Christie Reading Group discussion

23 views
Random Chit Chat > Suggested reading sequence order/ Book for February

Comments Showing 1-15 of 15 (15 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by C. J. (new)

C. J. Scurria (goodreadscomcj_scurria) | 367 comments Sounds good. I think that's not a bad idea.


message 2: by Malcolm (new)

Malcolm Noble | 0 comments The first Christie I ever read.


message 3: by Mark (new)

Mark (markvanvollenhoven) | 28 comments Excellent idea, but by now Agatha Christie is a somewhat renowned writer, it being 1930 and 10 years in her writing carreer.

Just out of curiosity, her 2nd book was a Tommy & Tuppence novel. Do we read the non-Poirot and Non-Marples?- Or do we leave them aside??


message 4: by Rebecca (new)

Rebecca Pierce (thensingsmysoul77) | 5 comments So, we read the stand-alones after Tommy and Tuppence? Short story collections?


message 5: by Candace (new)

Candace  (cprimackqcom) Sounds like a great idea! This will keep things interesting!


message 6: by Alberto (new)

Alberto Reading in publication order would mean that we would end with some of her worst books (Nemesis, Elephants Can Remember).


message 7: by Alberto (new)

Alberto Are we reading The Big Four, which is just a novelization of short stories written in Jan-Mar 1924? The reason I'm asking is it might be a good idea to put up the list for all of 2014.


message 8: by Alberto (new)

Alberto Assuming we skip the Big Four, I think the reading plan for 2014 would be as follows:

Jan: The Mysterious Affair at Styles (Poirot, 1920)
Feb: The Murder at the Vicarage (Marple, 1930)
Mar: The Murder on the Links (Poirot, 1923)
Apr: The Body in the Library (Marple, 1942)
May: The Murder of Roger Ackroyd (Poirot, 1926)
Jun: The Moving Finger (Marple, 1943)
Jul: The Mystery of the Blue Train (Poirot, 1928)
Aug: A Murder is Announced (Marple, 1950)
Sep: Peril at End House (Poirot, 1932)
Oct: They Do It with Mirrors (Marple, 1952)
Nov: Lord Edgware Dies (Poirot, 1933)
Dec: A Pocket Full of Rye (Marple, 1953)


message 9: by Mark (new)

Mark (markvanvollenhoven) | 28 comments fine with me.

I think it is a good idea to plan ahead so that all partipants know what they have to obtain way ahead of the game.


message 10: by Mark (new)

Mark (markvanvollenhoven) | 28 comments Lauren wrote: "Sounds good to me too.

We can skip The Big Four as a group, but if we do, I am going to read it on my own anyway because it's one of the Poirot mysteries that I have not read."


I'll join as I do not have read it either.


message 11: by Alberto (new)

Alberto I haven't read it either, so I'm ok either way.


message 12: by Malcolm (new)

Malcolm Noble | 0 comments Mark wrote: "Lauren wrote: "Sounds good to me too.

We can skip The Big Four as a group, but if we do, I am going to read it on my own anyway because it's one of the Poirot mysteries that I have not read."

I haven't read it either and, like Mark, will read it but, oh, it's got a poor reputation

I..."



message 13: by Richard (new)

Richard | 9 comments Just downloaded all of the books on the reading list onto my iPad but since I just finished styles this week I will read the big four to be going on with....


message 14: by Candace (new)

Candace  (cprimackqcom) I am also going to try one of her bk of short stories, if not more, so maybe we'll have enough for a side read on The Big Four. Just let me know ahead of time as it's not on the list above.


message 15: by C. J. (new)

C. J. Scurria (goodreadscomcj_scurria) | 367 comments I don't think I'd read The Big Four. The last time I read a collection of mystery stories I was a little disappointed. It almost discouraged me from reading any other of their books. I don't want that to happen to me with Christie though I am sure it's still pretty good.


back to top