Catching up on Classics (and lots more!) discussion
Archived Chit Chat & All That
>
Just Talking


You'd think so, but it didn't work the last couple of days. But I'm having a lot of trouble with goodreads these days. It might also be my browser. Who knows...

Thank you for making up this balance, Bob. I'll try to be more aware of this and nominate some books by female authors in the future.


How stupid of me - I could (and just have) done it myself!
Nente wrote: "Could we have a general discussion thread in Sherlock Holmes folder, please?"
There you go! Yes, you can do it yourself. Have fun with it.
There you go! Yes, you can do it yourself. Have fun with it.

http://lithub.com/the-most-important-...

I like to imagine that under the hood gr is a groaning mass of bits, badly stapled together, & under threat of collapsing or exploding if anyone touches anything.
I then like to imagine that the developers just run around with a giant sheet, trying to cover it up, & yelling 'nothing to see here'.

Some very interesting books on that list, & so many that have slipped past me so far! Think I'll need to invest in a few of them for 2017 :)

Interesting list of books Bat-Cat! Some I've actually read, many I haven't. I also question how a few of them got on the list in the first place because some, that I've read, I would not classify as "the most important books of the Last Twenty Years". :)

That was an interesting list, thanks for posting. I've only read 12 of the books mentioned and they were a very mixed bag for me, I liked half and really didn't enjoy the other half at all, in fact they're some of my least favourite books!


I really appreciate you sharing this, Bat-Cat. I've only read three! But this will help guide me in catching up with current reading. There are many on here I've heard wonderful things about. Thanks!





Abbey wrote: "Quick question....if the book was started in December, but less than half of the book was read, can it count towards 2017? (I thought I saw something about the rules on this somewhere, but I wasn't..."
Yes.
Yes.

Thanks Kathy!

I'm on "100 years of solitude." Dragging a bit and hoping to finish it later today...



After this book I will start to read some of Jane Austen books. I can't wait :)


Sounds like a timely read! I've got that one on my (too too long) TBR list, but who knows when I'll actually get around to reading it.

After this book I will start to read some of Jane Austen books. I can't wait :)"
I'll have to have a look at it. Jane Austen is one that I want to have a look at soon too. Read Lady Susan a few weeks ago as a short introduction and really enjoyed it, so looking forward to taking on one of the longer ones...hopefully she'll be as good as Dickens as I've nearly read all of his.

I live in Texas, and yesterday evening I was cycling to train for our next triathlon when a hailstorm caught us by surprise. Fortunately we were only three miles away from home, but it was so bad we couldn't see. My brother slid out and lost all the skin on his right thigh- (you're clipped onto your pedals) and I slid out once, but no other major injuries! I'm so grateful a car didn't slide out into us. Me after getting home:


Cute pic, Rhedyn :-) Glad that you didn't hurt yourself and I hope your brother is okay. Just wondering where in Texas you are. I'm in Lubbock and we haven't had hail, just lots of wind for days.


I agree wholeheartedly Laurie! :). Well said!!!

So many groups suffer from inactivity and not enough discussions for group reads, so it's wonderful to get such lively participation every month here.

Don't trust polls so much Laurie.
As far as I'm concerned, I want to read a short story with the group in March and I saw that so many good books were being nominated that I decided not to nominate one myself.
Moreover, I can't make up my mind as to which one to vote. That's why this time I'm not voting: I'm letting voters choose which story I'll be reading.
To make a long story short, I'm very interested on what we will be reading!
:)
Laurie I am also attached to the group and the thing that keeps this train moving forward is our members, the best on Goodreads. But I think another reason our group is successful is due the hard work of Kathy, Melanti, and Pink, since they are the ones that keep the tracks clear.

I quite agree Bob

Milena, I didn't mean to imply that not voting in the polls means that someone isn't interested. I don't vote in a particular poll if I'm sure I won't read any of the choices that month. But I am in another group that has triple the membership, but only about 10-15 voters each month in their polls. Then only one or two people read the group reads and post their comments. So for that group, the group reads are not the main focus of most of its members. If one joins a group to discuss books that we read together, this group fits that criteria wonderfully. Clearly we all join groups for different reasons and our levels of participation vary which is fine.
Books mentioned in this topic
They Were Sisters (other topics)The Wind in the Willows (other topics)
The Wind In The Willows (other topics)
The Consequence of Anna (other topics)
The Consequence of Anna (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Kate Birkin (other topics)Robert Coover (other topics)
Ray Bradbury (other topics)
Kate Birkin (other topics)
Kate Birkin (other topics)
More...
I have a good guess as to who you're talking about. And if I'm not right on the first guess, I'm pretty sure I can get it on the second. I'm not a fan of the feedback group, to be honest. I generally join to report or look for info on a bug, but then eventually get fed up with the general rudeness and lack of progress on reported issues then leave.
Andrea wrote: "Ok, so now I didn't get a notification, but at least I could check a box that said "notify me when people comment". Progress!"
Good!
If you want that "Notify me when people reply" box to be checked by default, then that setting is just under the group email preferences section you were just looking at.