Language & Grammar discussion
Grammar Central
>
Apostrophe! Again.
date
newest »

message 51:
by
Doug
(new)
May 16, 2015 06:21AM

reply
|
flag

Of course I could mind my P's & Q's or I could bring up the barman's argument that those are abbreviations (Pints & Quarts). I'm at 6's & 7's about what to do...
Why plow when one may chug, down, or quaff?

Whose which is possessive form of who.
It is interesting since we do not know who who is so it would be assumed singular i think,.
Also these who's in three different words,
Who's (Who is
Who's (Who has
Who's (possessive form of Who)
Whos (plural) Apparently like the anonymous Whos in Whoville.
Whos' (possessive plural)
Whose (so is this the possessive singular form ?????)
:)

However, when in internet situations where circumstance would demand that I use double-strophe or 'full' quote-mark symbol? In that case my personal policy is reversed. Then is when the single-quote is my friend. The single quote-mark is my go-to punctuation character for *any* situation needing a quote-mark. I hate double-quotes! They look heavy and cumbersome. And (similar to the situation above with possessiveness) typing them slows me down. So, I'll use a single-apostrophe in almost any extremity. In dialog, for word emphasis, for irony, in book or movie titles...and I say, to the devil with anyone who thinks this untoward of me!

Here's another example: say I've just speed-typed the word youre. I can do that without looking at my keyboard. But now I have to halt my typing and go back to place the single-apostrophe between [you] and [re]. It is another groaner.
I don't mind this latter operation so much (in comparison to the first item I just explained above) but I *really* do mind inserting single-quotes when it comes to words like, [its] vs [it's]. This word is used so frequently, that it would send me 'round-the-bend to have to pop an apostrophe mark in one, every time I wanted to show a possessive [its] vs a contraction [it's].
My current dodge is to
1) not implement apostrophes for contractions like [it's];
2) not use full quotes at all unless absolutely forced to; and
3) instead of 'slowing down' for [you're] and [they're] I type slang like [yer] and [ye] and [thee] and [thy].

Are you aware that Word dictionary check spelling has an autocheck feature that when turned on will substitute virtually any combination with a correction of your choice while you type? Ie: Put you're in the correction dictionary and everytime you type youre it will automatically make the substitution for you. If you set it to substitute a period space with a period and two spaces plus capitalize the next letter ,,, well you can see the possibilities. You never have to hit the space bar twice or capitalize beginnings of sentences etc.

P S
you can ask the dictionary to replace (it s) with (it"s) and problem solved just by typing a space instead of the '.


Welcome. I use Word and open source too.

It'd be a great idea to remove it and put it someplace else less intrusive on the KB such as over near 'Print Screen', would it not?

It'd be a great idea to remove it an..."
If you use Firefox, have you checked out the key next to the right hand control key? I finally did after years and found much to entertain me.

It'd be a great idea to remove it an..."
Ever see a Dvorak Keyboard? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyboar...
The original QWERTY layout is supposed to have been designed in such a way as to maximize typing speed while minimizing the frequency of key lock-ups (back when each key had to power a lever that struck the typewriter ribbon in front of the paper on the platen.

It'd be a great idea ..."
That was super interesting. No newer dvorak. I only knew about typwriter key layout history from very old teachers in the mid fifties. I know a few things through them. I used to set type by hand and the type drawers had a certain layout.

I think that THAT standard was even older. If I'm recalling it correctly, Ben Franklin mentions sorting type for his brother at some point in his autobiography.

I think that THAT standard was even older. If I'm recalling it correctly, Ben Franklin mentions sorting type..."
The worst thing that can happen in typesetting is when someone bumps the table or draawer and all the type jumble out of position then have to be stood back up in form. That is called sorting and also has to be done when breaking down frames.

I think that THAT standard was even older. If I'm recalling it correctly, Ben Franklin menti..."
You do not have to look at the type to do it as long as the letters are the same because there is a locking groove so that you can do it by feel. This could have where Ben learned to read.

the semi-colon;
and the ellipsis...
What say ye?


How can you hate a punctuation mark that's always flirting with you ;-)


Sometimes, when you're sick of periods, and when the two sentences are related (a frequent occurrence, given the in-breeding), I stick a semi in there. Nice. And if it's out of fashion, nicer still....
I don't mind them so much in prose, but I try to avoid them in poetry where the look of the poem on the page is so important. Well, to me, anyway.




"TV's fate is yet to be determined"
and "TV's getti..."
What is snob the abbreviation for? Son of a bitch?