Language & Grammar discussion

158 views
Grammar Central > Apostrophe! Again.

Comments Showing 51-88 of 88 (88 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1 2 next »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 51: by Doug (new)

Doug | 2834 comments I use A quite a lot. A are essential in my writing.


message 52: by Hilary (new)

Hilary (agapoyesoun) Oh I hadn't thought of its producing a new word, NE. I'm afraid I'm stuck with it though ...


message 53: by Stephen (last edited Oct 14, 2015 09:04AM) (new)

Stephen (havan) | 1026 comments Newengland wrote: "The trouble comes, of course, with things like the plural of the letter A. Now the apostrophe if forced into service, else you've created another word: As."

Of course I could mind my P's & Q's or I could bring up the barman's argument that those are abbreviations (Pints & Quarts). I'm at 6's & 7's about what to do...


message 54: by Doug (new)

Doug | 2834 comments just keep ploughing (or is it plowing) along. or pluffing. :)


message 55: by [deleted user] (new)

Why plow when one may chug, down, or quaff?


message 56: by Doug (new)

Doug | 2834 comments Just ran into an interesting word and a contraction I haven't seen lately.

Whose which is possessive form of who.
It is interesting since we do not know who who is so it would be assumed singular i think,.

Also these who's in three different words,

Who's (Who is
Who's (Who has
Who's (possessive form of Who)
Whos (plural) Apparently like the anonymous Whos in Whoville.
Whos' (possessive plural)
Whose (so is this the possessive singular form ?????)
:)


message 57: by Feliks (last edited Oct 17, 2015 10:24PM) (new)

Feliks (dzerzhinsky) I myself typically don't make many mistakes with apostrophes. Rather, the mistakes I make are deliberate ones: for example --when on the internet--I almost never bother with them to indicate possession. I never write the word, "it's" with a ['] between the [t] and the [s]. It would slow me down far too much. I just don't consider the internet a formal enough environment to be scrupulous about this.

However, when in internet situations where circumstance would demand that I use double-strophe or 'full' quote-mark symbol? In that case my personal policy is reversed. Then is when the single-quote is my friend. The single quote-mark is my go-to punctuation character for *any* situation needing a quote-mark. I hate double-quotes! They look heavy and cumbersome. And (similar to the situation above with possessiveness) typing them slows me down. So, I'll use a single-apostrophe in almost any extremity. In dialog, for word emphasis, for irony, in book or movie titles...and I say, to the devil with anyone who thinks this untoward of me!


message 58: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
So it's the SHIFT key you object to? (Shift = double quote mark, no shift = single)


message 59: by Feliks (last edited Oct 19, 2015 01:57PM) (new)

Feliks (dzerzhinsky) Well not just using the shift but having to halt right before typing a word --find the shift key--implement the quotes with it; type the word--and then halt again after the word to find the shift key again and close the quotes. Yes, it is totally irksome.

Here's another example: say I've just speed-typed the word youre. I can do that without looking at my keyboard. But now I have to halt my typing and go back to place the single-apostrophe between [you] and [re]. It is another groaner.

I don't mind this latter operation so much (in comparison to the first item I just explained above) but I *really* do mind inserting single-quotes when it comes to words like, [its] vs [it's]. This word is used so frequently, that it would send me 'round-the-bend to have to pop an apostrophe mark in one, every time I wanted to show a possessive [its] vs a contraction [it's].

My current dodge is to
1) not implement apostrophes for contractions like [it's];
2) not use full quotes at all unless absolutely forced to; and
3) instead of 'slowing down' for [you're] and [they're] I type slang like [yer] and [ye] and [thee] and [thy].


message 60: by Doug (new)

Doug | 2834 comments Feliks wrote: "Well not just using the shift but having to halt right before typing a word --find the shift key--implement the quotes with it; type the word--and then halt again after the word to find the shift k..."

Are you aware that Word dictionary check spelling has an autocheck feature that when turned on will substitute virtually any combination with a correction of your choice while you type? Ie: Put you're in the correction dictionary and everytime you type youre it will automatically make the substitution for you. If you set it to substitute a period space with a period and two spaces plus capitalize the next letter ,,, well you can see the possibilities. You never have to hit the space bar twice or capitalize beginnings of sentences etc.


message 61: by Doug (new)

Doug | 2834 comments Feliks wrote: "Well not just using the shift but having to halt right before typing a word --find the shift key--implement the quotes with it; type the word--and then halt again after the word to find the shift k..."

P S
you can ask the dictionary to replace (it s) with (it"s) and problem solved just by typing a space instead of the '.


message 62: by Feliks (new)

Feliks (dzerzhinsky) Eh, well I do most of my typing on webpages and offline...I've seen MS Word's correction ability. Some of it is useful but nothing beats a human review. I'd never leave decision-making about sentence context up to an algorithm. Thanks, though. What I should use MSWord for is to help me with my "teh" problem.


message 63: by Doug (new)

Doug | 2834 comments Feliks wrote: "Eh, well I do most of my typing on webpages and offline...I've seen MS Word's correction ability. Some of it is useful but nothing beats a human review. I'd never leave decision-making about senten..."
Welcome. I use Word and open source too.


message 64: by Feliks (new)

Feliks (dzerzhinsky) I wonder why the 'caps lock' key is considered so important that it resides in such a prominent location on the keyboard. Who really uses it that much, anyway?

It'd be a great idea to remove it and put it someplace else less intrusive on the KB such as over near 'Print Screen', would it not?


message 65: by Doug (new)

Doug | 2834 comments Feliks wrote: "I wonder why the 'caps lock' key is considered so important that it resides in such a prominent location on the keyboard. Who really uses it that much, anyway?

It'd be a great idea to remove it an..."


If you use Firefox, have you checked out the key next to the right hand control key? I finally did after years and found much to entertain me.


message 66: by Stephen (new)

Stephen (havan) | 1026 comments Feliks wrote: "I wonder why the 'caps lock' key is considered so important that it resides in such a prominent location on the keyboard. Who really uses it that much, anyway?

It'd be a great idea to remove it an..."


Ever see a Dvorak Keyboard? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyboar...

The original QWERTY layout is supposed to have been designed in such a way as to maximize typing speed while minimizing the frequency of key lock-ups (back when each key had to power a lever that struck the typewriter ribbon in front of the paper on the platen.


message 67: by Doug (new)

Doug | 2834 comments Stephen wrote: "Feliks wrote: "I wonder why the 'caps lock' key is considered so important that it resides in such a prominent location on the keyboard. Who really uses it that much, anyway?

It'd be a great idea ..."


That was super interesting. No newer dvorak. I only knew about typwriter key layout history from very old teachers in the mid fifties. I know a few things through them. I used to set type by hand and the type drawers had a certain layout.


message 68: by Doug (new)

Doug | 2834 comments If you wiki "apostrophe" you will be amazed. It's got more history than you can imagine.


message 69: by Stephen (last edited Oct 21, 2015 02:04PM) (new)

Stephen (havan) | 1026 comments Doug wrote: "... used to set type by hand and the type drawers had a certain layout. "

I think that THAT standard was even older. If I'm recalling it correctly, Ben Franklin mentions sorting type for his brother at some point in his autobiography.


message 70: by Doug (new)

Doug | 2834 comments Stephen wrote: "Doug wrote: "... used to set type by hand and the type drawers had a certain layout. "

I think that THAT standard was even older. If I'm recalling it correctly, Ben Franklin mentions sorting type..."


The worst thing that can happen in typesetting is when someone bumps the table or draawer and all the type jumble out of position then have to be stood back up in form. That is called sorting and also has to be done when breaking down frames.


message 71: by Doug (new)

Doug | 2834 comments Doug wrote: "Stephen wrote: "Doug wrote: "... used to set type by hand and the type drawers had a certain layout. "

I think that THAT standard was even older. If I'm recalling it correctly, Ben Franklin menti..."


You do not have to look at the type to do it as long as the letters are the same because there is a locking groove so that you can do it by feel. This could have where Ben learned to read.


message 72: by Feliks (last edited Oct 25, 2015 10:22PM) (new)

Feliks (dzerzhinsky) Backing off from any and all aggravation associated with apostrophes, I would like to take this opportunity to hail and salute my two *very* favorite punctuation characters:

the semi-colon;

and the ellipsis...

What say ye?


message 73: by Ruth (new)

Ruth | 16546 comments Mod
Hate semicolons. Ugly as sin.


message 74: by Feliks (last edited Oct 25, 2015 11:37PM) (new)

Feliks (dzerzhinsky) their efficacy is their beauty; they are firm rather than weak (run-of-the-mill commas--such marks never have the force they need, and crave)


message 75: by Stephen (last edited Oct 26, 2015 12:41AM) (new)

Stephen (havan) | 1026 comments Ruth wrote: "Hate semicolons. Ugly as sin."

How can you hate a punctuation mark that's always flirting with you ;-)


message 76: by Ruth (new)

Ruth | 16546 comments Mod
They're just messy-looking on the page.


message 77: by Feliks (new)

Feliks (dzerzhinsky) Good point. Me, I feel the messiest punctuation is probably..well, I have to go back to the full-quote marks I guess. It is the butt of most of my disgust.


message 78: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
I like semicolons when they clear up the confusion of comma-happy sentences.


message 79: by Amber (new)

Amber Foxx (amberfoxx) | 23 comments I know an editor who dislikes semicolons. I feel as though they've gone out of fashion--if there's such a thing as fashion in punctuation.


message 80: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Sometimes, when you're sick of periods, and when the two sentences are related (a frequent occurrence, given the in-breeding), I stick a semi in there. Nice. And if it's out of fashion, nicer still....


message 81: by Ruth (new)

Ruth | 16546 comments Mod
I don't mind them so much in prose, but I try to avoid them in poetry where the look of the poem on the page is so important. Well, to me, anyway.


message 82: by Feliks (last edited Oct 26, 2015 06:29PM) (new)

Feliks (dzerzhinsky) Since I am very prone to multiple-clause sentences in my writing, I rely on them often. Love 'em! What often 'looks wrong' to me is the over-use of commas. Commas are poorly understood by many and reverted to in many instances where they should be omitted. It often 'sounds to the ear' as if a comma needs insertion but it is often not so.


message 83: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
Comma rules are like rabbits. Still multiplying...


message 84: by George (new)

George Klima (klimaz) | 1 comments About TV's, DVD's, HDMI's and other plurals of all-capital abbreviations. The argument in favour of using the apostrophe is to avoid possible confusion with a TVs or a DVDs or an HDMIs, whatever they might be.


message 85: by Ken, Moderator (new)

Ken | 18714 comments Mod
And it's a good one. Argument, I mean...


message 86: by Doug (new)

Doug | 2834 comments Rules is rules is rules and they almost always work. Commas help you read faster and avoids confusion. What I use them for a lot in poetry is to slow the reader down for a thought. Poetry without commas is okay when it is basic and the lines are short. The nice thing about poetry is the ain't rules ain't rules rules except...


message 87: by Geoffrey (new)

Geoffrey | 126 comments Mark wrote: "Melinda wrote: "The TVs vs TV's controversy is big. Both ways are accepted, but I favor TVs for plurals because it differentiates between these:
"TV's fate is yet to be determined"
and "TV's getti..."


What is snob the abbreviation for? Son of a bitch?


message 88: by Doug (new)

Doug | 2834 comments Geoffrey wrote: "Mark wrote: "Melinda wrote: "The TVs vs TV's controversy is big. Both ways are accepted, but I favor TVs for plurals because it differentiates between these:
"TV's fate is yet to be determined"
an..."


My own research leads to french meaning sort of like "got no male organ".


« previous 1 2 next »
back to top