The Bookhouse Boys discussion

This topic is about
Go Set a Watchman
Go Set a Watchman
>
Go Set a Watchman discussion
date
newest »


I hope folks are enjoying this book because I am. Why? Mostly because of Harper's sparse, delicate language.
I know it might be difficult to compartmentalize knowing that Go Set A Watchmen is a draft, but judging it on its own merits, I think it is quite good.
Harper Lee does an excellent job at pacing her tale as well as introducing her protagonist and ensemble. But my favorite moments aren't necessarily the interaction between her cast but those moments of solitude when Scout is figuratively and literally beside herself and can reflect on her past and recent events.
There is one moment when Scout awakens quite early before anyone else and she decides to to wander the grounds and smoke a cigarette. It was during that moment I really connected with this book, as I found myself transported in that intimate moment of solace though Scout had some reflecting to consider.
As it my usual custom, I save my thoughts for the recording. This is not because I'm too lazy to write them out (yes it is), but because I only have a few thoughts about any subject, and I hate to repeat myself (this is also true)
Thanks for sharing yours, though, Rob!
(PS: you imply that GSAW is an early, unfinished draft, but that's not true....it's simply a finished draft that they decided not to publish originally)
Thanks for sharing yours, though, Rob!
(PS: you imply that GSAW is an early, unfinished draft, but that's not true....it's simply a finished draft that they decided not to publish originally)

And as a finished manuscript I find it quite satisfying.
I'm not sure if it is the accessibility of its language or the fact that I haven't read a piece of prose for sometime, but this book is refreshingly breezy despite the gravity of Scout's revelations and predicaments.

And as a finished manuscript I find it quite satisfying.
I'm not sure if it is the accessibility of its language or the fact that I haven't read a piece of prose for sometime, but this book is refreshingly breezy despite the gravity of Scout's revelations and predicaments.
Totally ran out of time to finish this book before the weekend, so I'll be listening to it while I drive to pick up Athena tomorrow...read by Reese Witherspoon. :\
As a good friend of mine would say, BOOM!
There are only a few literary events of sufficient gravity to lure the Bookhouse Boys out of retirement: dinosaur romance....a new Twilight novel...or a new novel from infamously reticent one shot wonder Harper Lee. Join us as we boldly lay bare our childhood heroes, strip the rose-colored gauze from our eyes, and decide whether GSAW can stand proudly alongside the greatest works of American literature...or if its only legacy will be to topple one of literature's most revered pillars.
OUTRO: "Things Are Changing" by The Relatives
http://bookhouseboyspodcast.podomatic...
There are only a few literary events of sufficient gravity to lure the Bookhouse Boys out of retirement: dinosaur romance....a new Twilight novel...or a new novel from infamously reticent one shot wonder Harper Lee. Join us as we boldly lay bare our childhood heroes, strip the rose-colored gauze from our eyes, and decide whether GSAW can stand proudly alongside the greatest works of American literature...or if its only legacy will be to topple one of literature's most revered pillars.
OUTRO: "Things Are Changing" by The Relatives
http://bookhouseboyspodcast.podomatic...
Dave had some thoughts about the title that he forgot to get to on the podcast....good thing we have a discussion forum that would be perfect for continuing the conversation...*poke* *poke*

http://bookriot.com/2015/07/20/the-book-riot-podcast-episode-115-all-the-asterisks

Like all of you, I have very mixed feelings in regards to this manuscript. As Jason mentioned, I think Harper Lee did an economical job of describing and relating Maycomb. It felt genuine, almost tactile. It is a "place".
Some of the themes that Dave had mentioned were worthy of discussion and pause for thought, too. Such as, how do we deal and relate to those relatives who are clearly racist or of an antiquated thought? Though, there was no clear solution or even iteration of process, it's an unfortunate concept that pervades as strongly as ever.
I also found Harper Lee's language to be elementary, in a sense. Not pedantic or insulting, nor too academic, and I found that "lightness" to be refreshing, in a way.
Now the rest, as we've phrased and coined "the ending", was a real gut churner. It made Jean-Louise into a completely gutless, wishy-washy, emotional stereotype of a damsel, placating to the patriarchal iron-fist of the Finch's. It was really difficult to take.
Now, I have to ask. We all agree that Go Set A Watchmen is not necessarily a good book, but does it have an important role in the literary world?
Ultimately, I want to look at it as its own work, in a vacuum, removed from TKaM. My judgement would be that it's not a very good book, but it's not bad. As I said on the show, the lurching from light satirical sketches, to overwrought melodrama, to wistful reminiscence, to philosophical monologue just about made me sea sick and prevented this from being great in any way. It's an interesting footnote to TKaM, in my opinion, but mostly because of what Jason pointed out: we're Scout and this book shattered our idealized Atticus...still, that being said, Atticus remains unchanged for me. I prefer to look at the world that way and no arthritis or bigotry will change that.


Let us know what you think of it, Sherry. That was one of the things we talked about, actually: is it a sequel (kind of, because it was published second), or a prequel (kind of, because it was written first), an alternate universe of sorts, or what? I'm not sure there's an exact precedent.
I'd be really curious to hear what you think of it, too, Mom. It completely dismantles one of the most beloved characters in American literature.
Since this is a *NEW* book, please use tags to hide any text that might spoil plot points for readers. To use spoiler tags: before your spoiler-y text put < spoiler > without the spaces I used. At the end of the spoilers, put < /spoilers > without the spaces. It will look like this:
So, it turns out that (view spoiler)[Bruce Willis was dead the after the first scene in the movie. He was a freaking ghost, bro! This Shyamalan guy can do no wrong. I predict each movie will be better than the last! (hide spoiler)] and so I recommend you see the movie.