Shut Up & Read discussion
Archives
>
All Amazon reviews are bogus
date
newest »

message 51:
by
Elaine
(new)
Jul 05, 2014 04:01AM

reply
|
flag

Did you ever drink that pop shandy? I tried some a while ago; not bad (though I was a little wobbly after the 150th can).



I have 11 Reviews for The Angel Committee only one is three star the rest are four or five, its a result. The genuine reviews are the ones marked verified purchised.

If you don't rate the reviews there is a simple solution - don't read them and draw your own conclusions.

Some writers do "buy" reviews. I would never do that, even if I did have the money (which I don't!). These sites "sell" reviews but they don't promise glowing reviews. So basically what they're asking for is payment to support the website and its owner, and maybe compensation for the reviewer's time.
Is that really any different than a Hollywood studio giving free screenings for film critics who are paid by magazines, newspapers or online sites to write reviews? Most moviegoers respect the opinions of movie critics, even when they don't agree with them, and those critics *are paid* to do what they do and they see the movies for free.
Also, it's not that hard to tell when someone posts a review of a book s/he hasn't read, is it? I once did a favor for a friend of a friend who asked how he could repay me. I told him "buy a copy of my book and, if you'd like, write an honest review." He bought a copy but his review, (all three lines of it!), showed he probably hadn't even read the blurb, much less the book. His most glowing praise was that it cost less than a gallon of petrol. Seriously?
Some writers would like to delete the bad reviews, of course, but given the choice, I think we'd rather be able to delete the obviously stupid ones from people who hadn't bothered to actually READ the book!

I look for commonalities among reviews to see if there's a trend for a certain book. I also like to follow particular reviewers.

I think the hardest thing to remember is that reviews are personal opinions and should clearly be so. Disliking a book for its content does not mean the book is badly written, or that others will not enjoy it. That goes for writing style and characters too. I try to remember that when searching for new books to read.
I am a writer and I review. I don't pay or get paid for reviews, except keeping the book of course. I now refuse to add stars unless I loved the book and can happily give it 4 or 5 stars.
Why?
Well for Indie writers one of the best ways to sell their books is through the email newsletters which go out to their reader members. As the email list makers only want professional looking and produced Indie books they usually ask that writers may only submit their book if it has 8/10/15/20 4 and 5 star reviews.
See the problem?
I may dislike a book but it is my personal opinion and others may like it. If I give it one star that will affect the writer's rating and hir ability to sell it on those valuable to sales email newsletters.
So I will review a book and express my personal opinion but not rank it with stars unless it is a favourite. I wish Goodreads had a personal star system which did not become attached to the book and author.