The Pillars of the Earth question

I think that depends on the reader's preference. Follet's writing style and attention to detail are consistent in both, but I find The Pillars of the Earth more "gripping" because I am more interested in medieval history. I would surmise someone more interested in 20th century history would find Fall of Giants to be more interesting.

I have given both books five stars. They both are excellent something about Pillars of the Earth makes it a touch better.

Pillars of the Earth every time!

Pillars of the Earth, and World Without end were one of my favorite "series" of books. I liked Fall of Giants very much but not as much as the other two. I have not read the sequel to Fall of Giants, was it good?

They are basically the same book with different time periods.

Families moving, expanding, contrasting. They are both good reads.

The sequels are somewhat of a struggle to enter. Have started them several times -- I'll get there someday.

I cannot give an accurate answer since I have never read "Fall of Giants" but "Pillars of the Earth" is one of my favorite books of all time. It is a lengthy read, but doesn't have any parts that "drag" in my opinion. The storylines are compelling, character development is wonderful, and the book is just overall amazing, in my opinion. I must admit that I am partial towards books with a setting in the Middle Ages, so I may never end up reading "Fall of Giants."

Pillars of the Earth, definitely.

Consensus seems to be Pillars of the Earth. I agree.

My vote is Pillars of the Earth. I agree, I like historical novels about the Middle Ages. Fall of Giants is about a more familiar world order/disorder. Pillars and World Without End are about times that are not as familiar, but I keep reading and putting the pieces together. I appreciate the research and detail in all 3 books.

On balance, Pillars has it for me - and I would rate it as one of the best books I've read - totally absorbing.

"The Pillars of the earth" for sure

I think both books are good. The two I enjoyed them in a different way, as someone said at the beginning, everything depends on the reader and tastes.

Loved both series. Ya can't go wrong with any of them

Even though I enjoyed the historical aspects of Pillars of the Earth more, I found myself getting a lot more wrapped up in the characters and drama of the second book. The second book, for me, was even more 'un-put-downable.'

Pillars of the Earth simply because it was first, original and all around great to read. Although I loved the second book, they are too similar in style to compare equally. Recommend you read both, period.