All About Books discussion

This topic is about
A History of Reading
Non-Fiction
>
Group Read (December- January)- 'A History of Reading' by Alberto Manguel
I'm in the waiting list for it! I'm supposed to be the next one; hope to hate it for december then!



Thanks, Jenny. Don't know how I missed it!
Pink wrote: "Not that I'm complaining about having the choice of two books....but if we're reading two every time because the non-fiction read lasts for two months, wouldn't it be just as productive to nominate..."
I think that having two books between which to choose - being non fiction not so eady to "please" - is better than having one book oer month. But thst's just my opinion!
I think that having two books between which to choose - being non fiction not so eady to "please" - is better than having one book oer month. But thst's just my opinion!

@Pink, it is a test run for now, but personally I quite like it that way for reasons that Laura has already mentioned. The fact that we've chosen 2 for the last two runs also has to do with the fact that both times first and second place were only one vote apart, I am not yet sure whether we'd do the same if there was a significant lead by 5 or more votes for the winning book.




I received he file from https://openlibrary.org/ but it was too soon, so, since it looked so beautiful, I decided to buy it. I hope to receive it in a week or so!

A few of my favorite bits so far:
"When I found that Cervantes, in his fondness for reading, read "even the bits of torn paper in the street",' I knew exactly what urge drove him to this scavenging."
Mmm... yes. The drive to read is, for me, almost a compulsion, and, when there is nothing else, I read whatever print I can find - packaging material, even.
"To write down one's impressions of Hamlet as one reads it year after year," wrote Virginia Woolf, "would be virtually to record one's own autobiography, for as we know more of life, so Shakespeare comments upon what we know."
One of the most amazing things about rereading a Great Book I haven't read in at least a few years, is how much differently it reads each time, how much of myself I find in the bits that jump out at me.
"I quickly learned that reading is cumulative and proceeds by geometrical progression: each new reading builds upon whatever the reader has read before."
Oh, YES!!! Each thing I read somehow enters into dialogue with what came before... it is weird sometimes.
"You cannot embark on life, that one-off coach ride, once again when it is over," writes the Turkish novelist Orhan Pamuk in The White Castle, "but if you have a book in your hand, no matter how complex or difficult to understand that book may be, when you have finished it, you can, if you wish, go back to the beginning, read it again, and thus understand that which is difficult and, with it, understand life as well."
No comments on this, but it is so true...
It's funny, I've been reading Woolf, or related things, off and on since February or March, when I started her Writer's Diary... and I'm reading Pmuk's Istanbul right now... another small way in which one book overlaps with another. So, reading these paragraphs is colored by the time I've been spent with the authors quoted this year...

I've got the German edition as well and it really is heavy :)


Manguel has ups and downs with the history of reading, some I devour and some of it I rather skim.



I've LOVED it.
A bit "confused" - in the sense that it doesn't really follow a strict line, but this can be more a quality than a defect.
For further considerations in a day or two ...
A bit "confused" - in the sense that it doesn't really follow a strict line, but this can be more a quality than a defect.
For further considerations in a day or two ...

Pink wrote: "I've been reading this again today. Some very enlightening sections, but also other parts that are a bit boring for me"
Yes, this is its main defect: not always on the same level
Yes, this is its main defect: not always on the same level

LauraT wrote: "I've LOVED it.
A bit "confused" - in the sense that it doesn't really follow a strict line, but this can be more a quality than a defect.
For further considerations in a day or two ..."
I agree with you there, Laura
A bit "confused" - in the sense that it doesn't really follow a strict line, but this can be more a quality than a defect.
For further considerations in a day or two ..."
I agree with you there, Laura
Pink wrote: "I've been reading this again today. Some very enlightening sections, but also other parts that are a bit boring for me"
Yup!
Yup!
I am enjoying it so far but like Pink said, there are parts that I'm finding a bit tedious to read.Also, as Laura said, there's not much of a structure. Still, I'm learning a lot.
THat's right: there are parts that are a bit boring; the whole of the book moreover is not tight, if you see what I mean.
But there a re a lot of things to think about and reflect.
For one: the importance of reading aloud - or better, to have books read to you, as kids but not only then ...
But there a re a lot of things to think about and reflect.
For one: the importance of reading aloud - or better, to have books read to you, as kids but not only then ...

I love that it comes with images of the various modell's that da Vinci or Aristoteles or al-Haytam came up with in order to illustrate their theories.
LauraT wrote: "THat's right: there are parts that are a bit boring; the whole of the book moreover is not tight, if you see what I mean.
But there a re a lot of things to think about and reflect.
For one: the imp..."
I agree with you completely, Laura. I do like the points of reflections a lot.
But there a re a lot of things to think about and reflect.
For one: the imp..."
I agree with you completely, Laura. I do like the points of reflections a lot.
Jenny wrote: "I am currently reading the bit (quite close to the beginning) about how our brains decode those symbols on paper and on the the different schools of thought on how perceptions, decoding, imaginatio..."
Yes! That was very interesting.
Yes! That was very interesting.

It made me think about the fact, that there are quite a few texts that really benefit from being spoken and heard rather than being silently consumed, and apart from the obvious: plays, that to me also applies to very challenging texts. I found it really helpful to read 'Ulysses' out loud for example, or 'Paradise Lost', because it helps me understand what I am reading. Verse in general really profits too I think, as you get a much better sense of the rhythm and musicality of it.
Jenny wrote: "I am in the middle of the chapter 'The Silent Reader' and was surprised to find out that the tradition of reading happened used to be a mainly oral tradition, as in: happening out loud, and not jus..."
I was really happy about that because I sometimes like reading aloud - of course I have to be alone otherwise poeplo think I'm out of my mind! I really think that writing comes from speacking.
Has some of you reached the chapter about Aldo Manuzio?
I'm so proud of this compatriote of mine. He was a real humanist and, for his times of course, he really whidened the reading public through his works - and here we could start a discussion on how, or if, the material support influences what it is written within; i sicerely think that it does, to a certain extent.
I have an "aldina" one of his book printed in Venice in the XVI Century, and I cuddle it as a little baby - it is little indeed!
I was really happy about that because I sometimes like reading aloud - of course I have to be alone otherwise poeplo think I'm out of my mind! I really think that writing comes from speacking.
Has some of you reached the chapter about Aldo Manuzio?
I'm so proud of this compatriote of mine. He was a real humanist and, for his times of course, he really whidened the reading public through his works - and here we could start a discussion on how, or if, the material support influences what it is written within; i sicerely think that it does, to a certain extent.
I have an "aldina" one of his book printed in Venice in the XVI Century, and I cuddle it as a little baby - it is little indeed!
More or less in the middle, but I don't have the book with me anymore! Will I survive this month?
Jenny wrote: "I am in the middle of the chapter 'The Silent Reader' and was surprised to find out that the tradition of reading happened used to be a mainly oral tradition, as in: happening out loud, and not jus..."
Yes! That surprised me too. I first heard about that on Stephen Fry's show QI.
Also, I was reading a bit of Anais Nin's diary this morning and she talked about how she went to a party where they read Joyce's Finnegan's Wake out loud. I must say, I do get a different feel of a story when it's read out loud.
Yes! That surprised me too. I first heard about that on Stephen Fry's show QI.
Also, I was reading a bit of Anais Nin's diary this morning and she talked about how she went to a party where they read Joyce's Finnegan's Wake out loud. I must say, I do get a different feel of a story when it's read out loud.

Happy reading!