The Hobbit, or There and Back Again
discussion
Should I read this before the LOTR trilogy?
date
newest »

message 51:
by
[deleted user]
(new)
Jan 20, 2014 10:15PM
You don't really have to read the Hobbit first. I actually read it last. But if you want to go in order, then I'd start with the Hobbit.
reply
|
flag
I'd say so; it takes like a day to read. Then you aren't curious while reading LOTR and wanting to start it while working your way through the much larger books.

It doesn't matter which one you read first, but there are passing references to the Hobbit which make LOTR a deeper read. E.g. the trolls that got turned to stone make an appearance in both books and the relationship between Legolas and Gimli make more sense if you know that Legolas' father is the King of Mirkwood and that Gimli is Gloin's son.



Silmarillion after the Hobbit and LOTR. When you read the Silmarillion I suggest you have a printed out copy of all the family trees and map next to you so you can write down all the different names the same characters go by.

Silmarillion after the Hobbit and LOTR. When you read the Silmarillion I suggest you..."
Wow, so it is as difficult a read as my friends/family have told me? :S

Wow, so it is as difficult a read as my friends/family have told me? :S"
Not sure what you mean by difficult. It has the usual words on a page. ;)
But some of the elves end up with about 3 names each depending on who they meet and what they are doing. It helps if you print out the family trees and write the extra names in to keep everything straight.

And it's not like The Hobbit is a super-long arduous investment like LotR. It's a fun, relatively short, relatively quick read.
(It also helps explain that "plot-hole" that everyone who hasn't read the book complains about: why Gandalf can't just summon the giant eagles whenever he needs them. The Hobbit drops some hints as to why Gandalf can't do that, and The Silmarillion explains why completely.)



For example I can't remember any reference of sauron, legolas, saruman, etc.





But would you recommend to read the Silmarillion first or last? I want to try to understand as best I can but also enjoy the actual story side of things.
Thanks (:

I would read the Silmarillion first.

Ok, thanks for the help! (:

I think you should read in that order. I have yet to read the trilogy but I felt to read them in a progressive order. The Hobbit is like an introduction to the world and leads to the trilogy (that is more for adults than the "children's type" of book in Hobbit) that is the complicated world of Middle Earth and Mordor.
I think I'm gonna love reading the trilogy! (you will probably too whenever you get to it, this is just a suggestion). I just haven't because I am a slow reader.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
The Hobbit, or There and Back Again (other topics)
The Lord of the Rings (other topics)
The Fellowship of the Ring (other topics)
The Silmarillion (other topics)
More...
Books mentioned in this topic
Travesuras de la niña mala (other topics)The Hobbit, or There and Back Again (other topics)
The Lord of the Rings (other topics)
The Fellowship of the Ring (other topics)
The Silmarillion (other topics)
More...