The American Civil War discussion

Six Armies in Tennessee: The Chickamauga and Chattanooga Campaigns (Great Campaigns of the Civil War)
This topic is about Six Armies in Tennessee
44 views
General Discussion > Not Too Objective

Comments Showing 1-9 of 9 (9 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

Alex (alexhauck) | 2 comments I have enjoyed this book but feel the author is definitely bias when it comes to some of the generals and then generally does not think to highly of others. Why I would agree generals have their faults and strengths he just seems really over the top on where the author stands.

Did not know who else has read this one and if so what is your thoughts?


Joseph Rose | 4 comments Alex, I think that you hit the nail on the head. The author, Steven Woodworth, definitely has his favorites and his enemies. Both here and in his other writings, he hews to the standard version of a great and good Grant and Sherman (he's written a separate biography of Sherman). For his dismissiveness of George Thomas, look back at pgs. 194-96 ("Thomas envied Grant's position and resented being subordinate to him. He also seemed incapable of grasping the concept of Grant's aggressive style of warfare, and it scared him."), although he gave Thomas credit for Chickamauga. Woodworth, far too often, takes the mere assertions in Grant's and Sherman respective memoirs as fact.


message 3: by Manray9 (new)

Manray9 | 509 comments An interesting column from The Washington Post on Longstreet as viewed through history --

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...


message 4: by happy (new) - added it

happy (happyone) | 92 comments Good column Manray9, thnx for posting!


message 5: by Jan C (new)

Jan C (woeisme) | 160 comments Interesting, thanks.


message 6: by 'Aussie Rick' (new)

'Aussie Rick' (aussierick) | 1256 comments A very interesting article, thanks for posting the link MR9.


message 7: by David (new)

David Elkin | 64 comments Thanks from me as well. Very insightful and some excellent ideas espoused.


message 8: by Kirk (new)

Kirk (goodreadscomkirkc) | 0 comments Thanks for posting! One wonders at James Longstreet's reaction to the irony of being literally bombed in the North, the USS James Longstreet was used as a navy target ship off the coast of Mass(Cape Cod's Eastham, I had a post card of the Target Ship growing up, my paternal Grandmother/"Step"Grandfather lived in Eastham) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Jame...), and figuratively in the South(Lost Cause).


message 9: by Manray9 (new)

Manray9 | 509 comments Kirk wrote: "Thanks for posting! One wonders at James Longstreet's reaction to the irony of being literally bombed in the North, the USS James Longstreet was used as a navy target ship off the coast of Mass(Cap..."

I think the days of naval vessels being named for Confederates are behind us. The U.S. Navy had SSBNs named after Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson. Also there was an ADAMS-class DDG named USS SEMMES after Raphael Semmes.


back to top