Yet Another Hunger Games Group discussion

15 views
Other Stuff > Which book in the trilogy is the best?

Comments Showing 1-19 of 19 (19 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by CJ, Short for: Coriolanus John, Caesar John, and Claudius John (new)

CJ | 1098 comments Many people disagree over whether it's The Hunger Games or Catching Fire! Not many people seem to go for Mockingjay, but there's always got to be somebody!


message 2: by Sonia (last edited Oct 07, 2013 09:05AM) (new)

Sonia | 84 comments I have to go with The Hunger Games. It was really action packed, and I was never bored. Catching Fire was also good, however I was a bit annoyed by Katniss's state of mind throughout the book, and(spoiler) Peeta's psychotic mind when he comes back. I wish that Katniss were as strong in Catching Fire as she was in The Hunger Games , but I guess that was the point of it. Still, The Hunger Games was definitely my favorite.


message 3: by Bekah (new)

Bekah The first. I think there is always something about the first book that makes it the best. Although I like the last one a lot too.


message 4: by CJ, Short for: Coriolanus John, Caesar John, and Claudius John (new)

CJ | 1098 comments I thought that the sense of "new" in the first book made it seem as though the reader was actually there, and it made Katniss very relate-able. I thought that the second book was next-best, because I really loved the characters and the arena, but Katniss seemed to become less of a firecracker, since she was so absorbed in Peeta's life. The Mockingjay was very good, as well, but the arenas were always most interesting to me.


message 5: by Sonia (new)

Sonia | 84 comments Agreed.


message 6: by Ken (new)

Ken (kensamcampo) | 20 comments All three


message 7: by CJ, Short for: Coriolanus John, Caesar John, and Claudius John (new)

CJ | 1098 comments Good answer. XD


message 8: by Elmina (new)

Elmina | 184 comments Hunger Games. Then Catching Fire. Then Mockingjay.


message 9: by CJ, Short for: Coriolanus John, Caesar John, and Claudius John (new)

CJ | 1098 comments Bingo! I think they got worse as they went along, too.


message 10: by Elmina (new)

Elmina | 184 comments I know! I mean they weren't bad but they weren't as good as their last.


message 11: by CJ, Short for: Coriolanus John, Caesar John, and Claudius John (new)

CJ | 1098 comments Exactly.


message 12: by [deleted user] (new)

Catching Fire


message 13: by Elmina (new)

Elmina | 184 comments Hunger games BOOK was better. Catching fire MOVIE was better.


message 14: by CJ, Short for: Coriolanus John, Caesar John, and Claudius John (new)

CJ | 1098 comments I saw the movie yesterday!!! I liked both of the books better than the movies, but I think that the movie makers deserve a round of applause for sticking to the plot! :)


message 15: by Bekah (new)

Bekah I am just pretty upset that in the first movie they left out the part where Peeta and Katniss were lifted from the arena and Katniss is screaming at through the glass as they take Peeta away. Its like, Jen would have been so amazing doing that


message 16: by Elmina (new)

Elmina | 184 comments I know! I noticed just about every thing different between the books and movies so... Lol


message 17: by Bekah (new)

Bekah Haha when you read the book before you see the movies you always notice the details that were missed or added


message 18: by Elmina (new)

Elmina | 184 comments Yeah. I never watch the movie first.


message 19: by CJ, Short for: Coriolanus John, Caesar John, and Claudius John (new)

CJ | 1098 comments ;)


back to top