Time Travel discussion

This topic is about
An Extended Journey
Archive Book Club Discussions
>
AN EXTENDED JOURNEY (September 2013
Peter wrote: "You people are making me hungry."
Have you read this yet, Peter? Funny the similarity with your book and Paul's ... other than having Jefferson in common. I think Paul's Jefferson isn't nearly the arse your Jefferson was, though. I like to think he might have fallen somewhere in the middle personality-wise.
Have you read this yet, Peter? Funny the similarity with your book and Paul's ... other than having Jefferson in common. I think Paul's Jefferson isn't nearly the arse your Jefferson was, though. I like to think he might have fallen somewhere in the middle personality-wise.
This popped up in my notifications this morning. I think they could do better, but it's at least somewhat amusing.
The American Revolution Assimilation Kit
If you are visiting 1763-1776, consider the American Revolution Assimilation Kit for your convenience. Kit includes a Time Travel Mart luggage tag, official Pastport, a mini bottle of TK Brand Time Travel Sickness Pills, a Duel Starter, and era-appropriate facial hair (facial hair varies).
The American Revolution Assimilation Kit
If you are visiting 1763-1776, consider the American Revolution Assimilation Kit for your convenience. Kit includes a Time Travel Mart luggage tag, official Pastport, a mini bottle of TK Brand Time Travel Sickness Pills, a Duel Starter, and era-appropriate facial hair (facial hair varies).

The American Revolution Assimilation Kit
If you are visiting 1763-1776, consider..."
I love it. Though they can skip the facial hair, not in style then, but just wait a hundred years for real silliness. A safety razor would be nice.
Paul wrote: "Though they can skip the facial hair, not in style then, but just wait a hundred years for real silliness...."
An era-appropriate wig would be a better choice.
An era-appropriate wig would be a better choice.
Chapter 43
The only way to truly seize a scene is to memorize it. You have to study the faces and sounds and scents and setting. Grasp the joy yourself, let it flood your eyes and ears, absorb its warmth and energy through every pore, then tuck it away where your heart can always find it.
Such incredible writing Paul. Thank you.
(view spoiler)
The only way to truly seize a scene is to memorize it. You have to study the faces and sounds and scents and setting. Grasp the joy yourself, let it flood your eyes and ears, absorb its warmth and energy through every pore, then tuck it away where your heart can always find it.
Such incredible writing Paul. Thank you.
(view spoiler)

Lincoln, I'd agree.
Such examples are on every page.
Not to make Peter hungry, but Paul's prose is like melted butter; warm & tasty & ever flowing.
I haven't gotten to the point where Jefferson is completely convinced to do something that would completely (view spoiler) . But why stop there? Why not also petition Jefferson to (view spoiler) Perhaps Paul does have Jefferson do this in the end, but I wanted to express my hope for it before I find out whether Paul was able to convince Jefferson to be so forward thinking or not.

I do like how you're thinking here, Amy. It may come down to what's possible and plausible, but, hey, we are dealing with Time Travel! I could say more, but will hold off for now; would love to hear what others think of the possibilities.

Oh, you will, my friend, you will.
And already have, if memory serves.
Heh heh heh

The only way to truly seize a scene is to memorize it. You have to study the faces and sounds and scents and setting. Grasp the joy yourself, let it flood your eyes and ears, absorb it..."
Thank you so much, Lincoln. I felt as you do just imagining that household at such a sad time, the wrong time, sharing a tragedy that was all too common in the 18th century. Devastating in any century.

Oh, you will, my friend, you will.
And already have, if memory serves.
Heh heh heh"
Oh, good. I was hoping you'd notice that comment. Looking forward to it... I think. :-)

Amy, Any thoughts on how Time Travel could effect the past must still be couched within the context of the times, that is, given such a push change might be possible, but that change would only occur within the limits of the current, in place standards.
To affect a greater transformation you’d have to go back further, to cause a shift in the broader flow.
For me, to be believable any change must be Historically possible not just fanciful, or it becomes too far-fetched.
As Paul & I have already discussed this very issue at length, keep reading & then we’ll really have some give & take this month.
Go Time Travel.

When I call up this thread I get the first page, not the latest post.
What's up with that, I wonder?
Am I going backwards or something?
Howard wrote: "Responding to Amy’s last spoiler without resorting to such I’d say:
Amy, Any thoughts on how Time Travel could effect the past must still be couched within the context of the times, that is, give..."
Now I'm imagining a USA with less rights given to the states to take away it's people's rights.
Amy, Any thoughts on how Time Travel could effect the past must still be couched within the context of the times, that is, give..."
Now I'm imagining a USA with less rights given to the states to take away it's people's rights.

Good point, Howard. We must be mindful of the historical context of the Times, and know it well, but when the element of Time Travel is introduced, those Times could change. The question is how much. I've yet to read a Time Travel story that isn't fanciful. Part of the fun.

No doubt a revolution provides a climate for greater change than just the normal conventions without war would & add in those pesky Time Travelers & yes, anything's theoretically possible, but to be credible any changes would still have to be plausible.
Just saying.

Plausible is good, and more fun than probable. Some would question the plausibility of Time Travel, but we won't go there.

Keep reading Amy, you'll see.
The real question is still unframed.
Go 9%.
Howard wrote: "Amy's in need of the 9% solution.
Keep reading Amy, you'll see.
The real question is still unframed.
Go 9%."
Which is why I deleted my question. :)
Keep reading Amy, you'll see.
The real question is still unframed.
Go 9%."
Which is why I deleted my question. :)
So when the tour guide asks the tourists if any of them ever owned slaves or had ancestors that owned slaves, my initial reaction was to think that surely my family never did even though I'm originally from Alabama. But now I'm remembering the faded photo I found in my grandmother's attic that I have somewhere. It's much older than the other photos of interest that I kept. On the back, it's simply labeled "d***ies picking cotton 1/2 mile North of Apache on Randall's Farm." I don't know how to date the picture. I don't have any relatives with that name, but it's too close for comfort. I wonder if it's a picture of slaves or freed men. I've always wondered. Does anyone know how to determine the date of a photo by the type of paper, mounting,etc.?

And answer me this: are the pickers moving or poising?
In early photos you had to remain still or the image blurred & if it's a shot taken near your grandmother's time, they're no doubt sharecroppers.
Economic slavery there, insidious in its own way but you are not your grandmother nor a product of her times & slavery was legal, even if disgusting.
That's the real paradox of Paul's book: the land of the free and the home of the slave.
Most Time Travel tomes are escapist, a light romp.
Not so here & it makes you think.
Only one of the things I liked, however.
Howard wrote: "Amy, google Randall's Farm & look for somewhere near Apache; this might give you a time frame.
And answer me this: are the pickers moving or poising?
In early photos you had to remain still or th..."
Good hint. They're all poised. Although, I've seen a pictures from her childhood all poised, too. But the quality is far different.
And answer me this: are the pickers moving or poising?
In early photos you had to remain still or th..."
Good hint. They're all poised. Although, I've seen a pictures from her childhood all poised, too. But the quality is far different.
Howard wrote: "Amy, google Randall's Farm & look for somewhere near Apache; this might give you a time frame.
And answer me this: are the pickers moving or poising?
In early photos you had to remain still or th..."
The thing is that there is no Apache, Alabama. It could have been a community name. Or all that info could be incorrect since it seems someone tried to interpret pencil writings with pen at a later date. There is a whole paragraph of writing on the back done in pencil, but it's too faded to read. I'm thinking of copying it at work to see if I can get it to show up.
And answer me this: are the pickers moving or poising?
In early photos you had to remain still or th..."
The thing is that there is no Apache, Alabama. It could have been a community name. Or all that info could be incorrect since it seems someone tried to interpret pencil writings with pen at a later date. There is a whole paragraph of writing on the back done in pencil, but it's too faded to read. I'm thinking of copying it at work to see if I can get it to show up.

If you're near a university or museum try to find an archivist, a good one may be able to tell & again this would give you a clue to Timeframe.

Well, is Time a loaf of bread or a road map?
http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/1...

Well, is Time a loaf of bread or a road map?
http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/1..."
I prefer the loaf of bread. But the recipe could change.

Exactly.
Depends on the baker, as you've demonstrated.
Cook on, McDuff.
Howard wrote: "Paul points out 'the recipe could change'
Exactly.
Depends on the baker, as you've demonstrated.
Cook on, McDuff."
I seem to be reading the ending more slowly than I'd like, catching a few snatches between things like keeping an eye on a 3- year old taking her swim lessons into her own hands... and now she's discovered how to open the freezer to get at her favorite frozen peas. Gotta run!
Exactly.
Depends on the baker, as you've demonstrated.
Cook on, McDuff."
I seem to be reading the ending more slowly than I'd like, catching a few snatches between things like keeping an eye on a 3- year old taking her swim lessons into her own hands... and now she's discovered how to open the freezer to get at her favorite frozen peas. Gotta run!
Finished. Will need to mull it over a bit before reviewing. Got a little bogged down after the climatic Jefferson incident since I tend to read war descriptions in the same voice that Charlie Brown's teacher uses: whaa whaa whaa whaa whaa whaa. I can't help it. Heck. My eyes even glaze over when watching movie chase scenes unless they're done slapstick style (Johnny English, etc.) or feature an interesting twist on the norm.
I need a different ending. When the others of you get to the end, let's discuss.
I need a different ending. When the others of you get to the end, let's discuss.

Still for many reasons I think this book deserves discussion so Amy, I will talk to you off thread if you wish, until others catch up at least, but for now, a few general thoughts:
I very much liked this book for it was not what I expected, namely a great story that makes you think, always a plus for me that’s sadly a few & far between occurrence.
As I've said, the prose is most excellent, a first-rate command of the language, for example the humor used & the inner family dialogue in general, very believable & an almost effortless read, you’re drawn in from the get go.
The history was employed well also, again very credible & not laid on with too heavy a brush which can be rather stifling & his treatment of real people, not only the J’s & their surrounds, but many of the lesser characters and, as one who’s used this devise, I was impressed.
Because I am a writer, I also recognized his fine use of Myth, the ‘types’ used & how they related (as in the scene with the girl’s encounter with the soldier).
All effective storytellers use Myth even if they don’t express it with such jargon, nonetheless it never fails that if it’s a good story it’s always there, for such use of ‘types’ gives the back story without the narrative having to be explained & I also use this convention & so could very much appreciate his excellent use of it in this book.
He spun a wonderful tale, rich in texture not only for scene & placement but also for thoughts & feelings, etc., around a single gripping thing, a normal family thrust into the un-normal & unknown.
I did have issues: namely the details of Time Travel & of course, his choice of ending, which is quite unique & why I thought it met this month’s category.
I’m for discussing these things in detail here, without spoilers but will hold off until more members have finished the read.
But Amy, if you’d like, as I said we certainly can talk off thread.
The End...or a blessed new beginning...A true Revolution
(view spoiler)
Thank you Paul, fantastic read!!
(view spoiler)
Thank you Paul, fantastic read!!

If you hear the dogs, keep going. If you see the torches in the woods, keep going. If there's shouting after you, keep going. Don't ever stop. Keep going. If you want a taste of freedom, keep going.”
― Harriet Tubman

I was so wrapped up in David's and Monica's quest. I had such feelings of pride, and patriotism. Once the groundswell of anti-slavery was..."
I felt the same way. I enjoyed the perspective in this story in particular because (view spoiler)
E.B. wrote: "I felt the same way. I enjoyed the perspective in this story in particular because..."
Exactly. I want to read more time travel books that actually do (view spoiler) I think that's why I like time travel stories so much; there are so many different ways they could work out and so many different takes on what rules apply to the time travelers.
Oh, wow. It's so much easier to type in spoiler tags with a desktop computer than the 2 minutes it takes on a tablet
Exactly. I want to read more time travel books that actually do (view spoiler) I think that's why I like time travel stories so much; there are so many different ways they could work out and so many different takes on what rules apply to the time travelers.
Oh, wow. It's so much easier to type in spoiler tags with a desktop computer than the 2 minutes it takes on a tablet

I'd agree with you ladies, for the closer I came to the end, the more I knew it had to happen, which of course, it never did & this, on top of everything else, was an added mind blow.
However, I took exception to the Historical turn of events on general principle for I felt the path portrayed assumed certain things I would not think to be so possible, even given the changes.
In my opinion, there were larger issues at stake & events would not have flowed so smoothly.
It's hard to explain without spoilers, but this issue was NOT a giant concern, just an informed opinion.
I think everyone can tell I very much enjoyed the book & Paul should be proud of his art & I hope he is.
Another point was 'the how' of how the Time Travel happened & I've not seen any mention of this point here, again NOT a problem for me, just a difference from what I write.

Exactly. I want to read more time travel books that actually do [spoilers removed]I think that'..."
Me too. It is hard to pick out books that use time travel this way, especially from book descriptions. I think Paul took a chance with the storyline (and came out a winner, I will add) because so many writers are afraid to tackle (view spoiler) .
I agree, that's why I love time travel, too. Anything can happen, if it is portrayed in a believable manner. It makes my head hurt sometimes, but it's all good.

I'd agree with you ladies, for the closer I came to the end, the more I knew it had to happen, which of course, it never did & this, on top of..."
Hi Howard! (waves) Missed you! Been around, just super duper busy, every second of the day. Missed all you guys. :) And btw, sorry for the derail-- but I am so freakin' glad to see John back. (End derail)
I think (view spoiler) So I was willing to let some of my unanswered questions go because the story played out well in other regards.
Hope that makes sense with the spoiler tags, haha!

I'll take exception to Howard's exception, but only because we both enjoy it. My own belief, based on extensive research just short of borrowing Howard's machine, is that (view spoiler) Given the context of the times, including community standards that were in place during the Revolution, and a convergence of moral, economic, political, and leadership factors, (view spoiler) America gets a second chance.
Looking forward to your BEL next month, Howard!

Paul, as I've told you, you know my reasons & as you've explained to me your reasons & given no one else has mentioned any reasons, I guess they've got no problem with the reasoning of your reasons, so it does indeed seem that my reasoning's the problem & not your said reasons.
Thing is, when you're as old as me & find yourself in my circumstance, well then, the slant of your reasoning might just change, but no biggie, your book is great ether way.
So, will there be a spin off & if not, what's your reason?
Books mentioned in this topic
An Extended Journey (other topics)An Extended Journey (other topics)
An Extended Journey (other topics)
An Extended Journey (other topics)
Recipes from the Raleigh Tavern Bake Shop (other topics)
More...
[spoilers removed]"
I think you're on to something here! . . . partially. Lincoln, too. Harriet's definitely a Traveler, and she does try to explain. :-)"
I realized that one alternative was impossible. And then I reached the answer to what she is ... as much as anyone knows ... In my reading today.