The Fault in Our Stars
discussion
Am I the only one who didn't cry that much?
I didn't cry at all during the movie. I heard girls blowing their noses like warthogs in the back of the movie theater but I am proud (well I don't know about Proud... but defiantly sure)that no tear was shed by me.
Naturally, I am not a big crier... I used to be, but I think that my tears are now for the soul purpose of physical pain. The movie was by far the saddest I have ever seem (Except maybe The Help) but maybe that's why I didn't cry. Because it was so sad to the point that I knew it couldn't be real.
Naturally, I am not a big crier... I used to be, but I think that my tears are now for the soul purpose of physical pain. The movie was by far the saddest I have ever seem (Except maybe The Help) but maybe that's why I didn't cry. Because it was so sad to the point that I knew it couldn't be real.

I didn't cry much, either. I haven't seen the film yet, though; perhaps, that will have more of an effect on me. I predicted the ending pretty early into the novel, so it didn't come as a shock to me.






just wondering but if you said it's 2 1/2 stars then why did you rate it 5 stars


I agree! The thing that made me the most emotional was not the death of the character in the book, but rather putting myself in Hazel's shoes. The reality of the situation was the saddening part for me.

Same here! I must be too because I cried even before the book was over, and at the movie,also. I'm glad someone else feels the same way I do, I completely agree!

Ellica, you do have a heart, nothing's wrong with u, and u are not the only one who did not cried that much


I totally agree.


At the start, it sounded fairly good, since you don't really expect much to happen at the start. But as I read further and further, I started to realise that I was pushing myself to read the book, rather than it pulling me into it. I had made a vow to myself that I would read the whole book before I started reading something else, and really had to talk myself out of doing just that.
The characters had no depth, they were just like a name on a piece of paper. I didn't know them, and I didn't really feel like there was that much to know about them. The concept of the book itself is sad, but I do not feel that the book tells the story in a way for it to make me feel something more than very distant emotions.
I am a very sensitive person, and am highly capable of starting to cry about something horrible or sad happening to someone I do not know. I didn't cry this time. I felt that the story line was flat and was getting nowhere. I felt that instead of a story being told, the facts of the actions were stated, unemotional. Most of the time, when Hazel should have been feeling inexpressible sadness, nothing of the sort was mentioned, and it just made the characters seem emotionless.
I also think that Augustus just... fell in love with her out of the blue, and that there wasn't really a build up in the story. It just went by a straight line and it felt so superficial.
I love reading and writing. Books are practically my life. I read at least five hours a day and my life would have a point without a stack of books.
I didn't enjoy this book. It bored me and made me roll my eyes, waiting for the characters to saying the same things over and over again.
I do not have any personal experience with cancer, only that my friend's Mum died of it when I was small. I am not saying that cancer is not a sad matter, and I am not heartless to not find this book sad. I just think that it did not do justice to the idea, and it is not a very good book. Much worse than the book it could have been.

Then again, the only time I'..."
I cry about Sirius every single time. Waterfalls. That's what happens when they kill your favorite character. Though, the seventh time I read the books I cried about Moody, too... yeah, I guess I'm too sensitive... :D


Then I went to see the movie and i definitely thought I would at least get teary over the characters and their very real emotions but no, all my friends crying next to me and all i can do is stare and just watch them cry! I don't really know why......
I guess it just depends on who you are..

Well, no. I got the message loud and clear, but I don't think the amount of tears you spill over a book concludes your overall understanding and appreciation of the book. Like, do they think there is this 'Crying-Meter' where the more you cry, the more you understand what the book is trying to say?
Nope. I refuse to believe that just because I spilled maybe a couple drops of tears that I didn't get what John Green was trying to say.
The honest truth to why i didn't cry that much, is because I didn't connect to the characters and I never really felt like they were 'real'. To me there wasn't much going on, and i wasn't, truth be told, that into it. Thats the reason i didn't cry. Not because of my stone-cold emotions or my lack of skill to understand a book, but because I honestly didn't like the book that much.
Woah, I kinda had a big rant there sorry about that! I was really pissed off at what my friends said, so i needed to vent.

I related to that relationship between mother and daughter more than the rest of the book. Also, before I had even started reading I knew Gus was going to die -I hadn't read spoilers either, to me it was obvious but there you go :)



haha, I only cried when Augustus said his cancer returned, and of course when he died!

It's not just you. I didn't connect with them either. They seemed TOO quirky/hipster to be real. That's the best way for me to say it. Too introspective and wise beyond their years.



In the book i cried a lot,i cried a river over this book mostly when August pissed his bed and ..."
I agree with you so much, I cried over the book so much, it made me such a emotional wreck!



it was good, not GREAT. i had too high expectations for it maybe
I liked the book but I didn't cry at all. I mean it was sad, but it wasn't as if if you didn't expect they were going to die. I mean, that was the whole point!



You're not the only one! I didn't cry, but I really enjoyed the book. It felt like a fresh, clever approach to a hard topic, but like you said you expected sad. I went in knowing Hazel was terminal and I didn't feel overly emotional about the outcome, although of course it was sad!







Everyone makes out like it's the best book to have ever been published EVER and I'm like um..... No.

all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
De Profundis (other topics)
Paper Towns (other topics)
Flat-Out Love (other topics)
The Fault in Our Stars (other topics)
Books mentioned in this topic
Nevermore (other topics)De Profundis (other topics)
Paper Towns (other topics)
Flat-Out Love (other topics)
The Fault in Our Stars (other topics)
I may not be the most qualified person to say this, though. My nickname is (no kidding) "Stone" because I, apparently have a heart of stone when it comes to books. I have cried, on count, twice (not including this book) and my friends appear to think that someone who does not cry at the end of Allegiant is obviously oblivious to emotion. Suuuure. Also, The Book Theif. I choose to see these as happy books. The Fault in Our Stars, though I had my problems with the way the characters grieved, but I don't think the point of the story was to tell you that death was inevitable or whatever. This was a book about life. It made me grateful for the ability to breathe without help, to have both my legs, and two wonderful eyes, and all those other things we take for granted. Life doesn't have to be long. It just has to be worth it.