Indie Book Club discussion
Marketing
>
Reciprocity?
date
newest »





I see pleas for reviews, free book giveaways galore...


Why not do a little diligence, assess if the offer/author/novel is a good match, and try?
I always enjoy a good read and have no problem supporting solid work.
Another way to connect the dots is indie writers want everyone to take a chance with their work, but are unwilling to do the same for someone else.


The threat of 'retribution' is silly. Your work is subject to criticism the instant you kick it out the door - often by those who have little sympathy for the writing/creative process. Trust me - someone is going to hate your novel. Someone will love it. Most will read it then move on the the next title in the stack.

I'm not telling you not to do it. I'm just trying to explain why I personally choose not to, and pointing out some of the trouble that you can run into. Do a search for "authors behaving badly" sometime. You'll be shocked and appalled.


My point exactly.
I'm not shocked and appalled at the thought of authors behaving badly because it isn't news. I'm still willing to make the offer though because I know there are good writers out there with solid work.
Think of it this way: Any 'stranger' could take up one of the myriad of offers presently listed and savage them here, on Amazon, where ever. Sentence passed, damage done.
Swap invitations grant authors the opportunity to gauge potential compatibility while investigating work in a similar genre. I've had bad experiences too, but the negative, adversarial posture isn't a healthy way to operate.
Writers do their diligence when investigating potential online reviewers like Sift, Indie Books Blog or SF Reviewers. It's the same with an invitation like this.
You're right - This is not a debate; it's an opportunity. If it isn't for you, fair enough.
By that I mean a one-for-one swap: I'll read your novella/novel, (50 - 100K) in a specific time frame, then post a short, honest review at Amazon, on my Blog, and here at GR.
I don't mean a typical 'shill and gush'. Participants have to agree to a definite deadline, be willing to face constructive criticism, and genuinely honor the agreement.
Considering my schedule, I can do 4-6 titles (depending on size) by the beginning of October.
Again, only Sci Fi at this time, please.
Any interest?
Here are some of my titles:
Patrick Todoroff