Joseph Anton
discussion
"Was it worth it" --- should we even ask?
date
newest »


The Satanic Verses was just a book, like any other. Rushdie is a storyteller/commentator who is entitled to say what he wishes in a free society. And because he says what he says beautifully, he brings us something valuable ..."
I agree with you, Kevin. There's a valid question though, in "is free speech worth protecting at any cost?" Considered in the abstract, many if not most of us would probably answer, Yes. However, when applied to a particular work or a particular author/creator, I'm willing to bet that the question becomes harder to answer.
A work that one loves or at least respects as legitimate "art" is one thing, but what of it's a piece of rubbish, or is intentionally offensive or blasphemous? Protecting a Booker Prize winner is one thing, but should the same regard be given to someone like Mark Basseley Youssef (of "Innocence of Muslims" infamy)?
I know what my answer is to the question, but I'm interesting in hearing what others might have to say on the subject.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
The lack of an apology evinced, in the lights of Rushdie's critics, a self-righteous refusal to own any responsibility for the "cost" accrued, in lives and public resources, for his right to publish The Satanic Verses.
Was The Satanic Verses -- or would any book for that matter have been -- "worth it?" Is the question of "consequences" even a legitimate one to ask?