History is Not Boring discussion
What would the signers of the Declaration think about us today?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Mary JL
(new)
Jul 04, 2013 06:16AM

reply
|
flag


History is not boring, but it can be a stickler for details sometimes.

Hi everyone.
Mary JL rang my bell with her question about what the signers of the Declaration of Independence would think if they returned.
My new book, "Hellraiser—Mother Jones: An Historical Novel" just went to press and ebook publisher today and it is about a diminutive Irish woman who fought for the rights of the working class and underclass during the darkest period of the American Industrial Revolution.
She often referred to the "founding fathers" and lamented that their intentions had gone so far off track in her time which stretched from the last days of the Civil War to the worst days of the Great Depression.
While the constitution promised life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, equal rights and justice for all, capitalism established a new foundation built on greed, inequality and injustice that plunged most Americans into a state of economic servitude while robber barons competed with each other to see which one could become the richest man in the world.
As MoJo's story unfolds, one cannot avoid comparing the social, political and economic issues of her day with those of our day. And, in the book, MoJo does come back in spirit to observe a country in worse condition than she left it in 1930.
As we know, economic inequality today is extreme. She observes in the last chapter that the CEO of Walmart earns more in one hour than the average Walmart employee earns in one year!
And so, my friends, if the signers of the Declaration of Independence were to have come back in HER day or OURS, they would have been sorely disappointed!
Without promoting my book, I refer you to its preface which explains further this point of view and can be read for free here:
http://www.jerryash.com/uploads/3/2/5...



Yes of course we need some of these things--but Jefferson once stated that government was best when it goverened least. He at least I think would be appalled at the huge amounts of government paperwork and interference.

The federalists among the founding fathers pretty much lost their battle to state's rights advocates, but beginning in the 30s and 40s the federal government began taking control of social, political and economic policy.
I'm not saying it was, then or now, good or bad, but I do think that the result is that those who fight back, as Mother Jones did, are painted as un-American. In fact, through today's look-back, Mother Jones is often seen as an extremist who favored socialism over democracy. When, in fact, it was unrestrained capitalism she hated and she fought in FAVOR of democracy. She saw, and she has convinced me that she was/is correct in, that the Declaration of Independence favored a nation of the people, by the people and for the people, and along came capitalism which was/is built on a platform of the rich, for the rich and by the rich. At the expense of the people.
And, as MoJo observed even in her time, her country was not controlled by the democratic process, it was/is controlled by the capitalistic process. I don't believe what our forefathers would find today is anything like the vision(s) they had 250 years ago. Our government is frighteningly like - maybe worse than - the one our forefathers expelled during the American Revolution.
I didn't think this way until I researched the life and times of Mother Jones, got inside her quite intelligent head and caring heart. Then she got in my head and gave me a perspective that didn't quite turn me around, but gave me some serious pause.