A Discovery of Witches
discussion
Was I the only one...
date
newest »









Yes, she is gender role-restricted in the second book, but it's because they've traveled back in time and she's trying to act according to the social mores of the time to avoid suspicion, not because Matthew is trying to suppress her. She also has to hide the fact that she's American.
I don't think Diana's family tried to undermine her powers, just that they were afraid that she'd be in danger like her parents were.

Agreed. The second book was harder to swallow for that reason. Although Mathew always says its a part of a vampire to be possessive, its still annoying. I can't find myself loving a male lead who is that over bearing since I would never want to be with someone like that.




It really wasn't anything your probably already read so if you can make it past an annoying romance by all means try for the second read. Some details were pretty neat.

My edition was about 500 pages, I believe. I couldn't finish it due to the lack of magic, paranormal creatures and romance. I found the courting laughable. Vampire yoga? I mean, really.
As a paranormal romance reader, I thought the relationship was pushed to the background and I didn't like that. I just found it incredibly boring.


Oh well! I enjoyed it, unbelievably quick romantic progression and all. It's not a five star book, but it's certainly enjoyable.
The second book lost momentum, for me. I didn't enjoy it nearly as much, but it was still "good".




I sunk so deep into these books and brow beated my friends into reading them to get them off of re-reading Twilight.
I find Deborah Harkness writing so smooth and flowing I fell into a non-stop reading jag, in fact had to re-read these. I had a job a the time where I would listen to Books on CD while working to drown out the work noise & radio.. That was my first introduction to the book... then had to have it. Deborah writes beautifully. her website is awesome as well. I enjoyed her 2nd book and again found myself in a all night book feast. I read it way too fast and now am left with the cliff hangers, waiting for the 3rd book..
I found there to be lots of undertow action..and did not find the story lacking in any nature.
If anything found this series to be a more honest reality check if that could be said of Vampires, Witches and things that go bump in the night!
I like the fact that they are forming a bond across natures and celebrating differences, forming the alliance...against evil..

I read it last year. Loved the beginning but thought the book was taken over by another author when the tone of the book changed. It seemed more ridiculous than romantic to me. So disappointed. Will not put myself through book number 2.


I agree with you!!!!


I really enjoyed this book, and have read it several times. Now I'm not defending the book, but I gotta ask, based on some of the crap I have read, especially compared to this book - please tell me what books you liked.


I really enjoyed this book, and have read it several times. Now I'm not defending the book, but I gotta ask, based on some of the crap I have read, especially ..."

I really enjoyed this book, and have read it several times. Now I'm not defending the book, but I gotta ask, based on some of the crap I ha..."I'm quite eclectic in my reading, but here are a few Any James Rollins,Jim Butcher, George RR Martin, Tom Clancy, Steven Brust, Viki Petersen etc...

I think the story itself was generally good, I loved the history and the "how magic works" bits, and Harkness's writing. The characters are mostly great. The romance did happen too quickly, and for me it ruined a lot of the tension.
I was very excited about the first book, a bit "meh" about the second and not sure if I'll be reading the third.



"Eat. Drink. Talk.", good one! And let's not forget the napping!

She is this brilliant historian but we never see that side of her.
Harkness ties their relationship into the plot, but I wish it had remained about the manuscript instead...
As far as Shadow of Night goes, I won't give any spoilers but I didn't think it improved and I had the same issue.
I hope Matthew dies at the beginning of the third book... not because I dislike him but because I think it would make for a more interesting story.

to enthrall me and it never did. It wasn't horrible but I never felt invested in the story, Kind of blah...

to enthrall me and it never did. It wasn't horrible but I never felt invested in the story, Kind of blah..."
I liked the book but agree with some of the other comments. Too MUCH romance to a rather obsessed degree. The noise of that relationship drowns out everything else.

I loved the romantic focus intertwined with historical places, people and events. The underlying idea that supernatural creatures are becoming extinct is a fresh story line in a currently saturated market. I cannot wait for the third book.

I loved the romantic focus intertwined with historical places, people and events. The underlying idea that supernatural creatures are becoming extinct is a fresh story line..."
thank you!!!I love these books as well and can hardly wait until Deborah gets her 3rd one done..if you haven't listened to the CD's go to your local library and check them out..they are great and the readers just add so much depth to the books...

Thankfully the second book resolved my issues with the book! Diana is really a strong character and Matthew is not just a shiny diamond ^^
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
As a librarian and fantasy / sci fi reader, I figured that I would love this book. But, It got a little dull for me and became too much like the twilight series. Matthew's vampire characteristics and personality is similar to Edward Cullen. Matthew kind of treats her like a child while simultaneously 'being dangerous'. I was kind of hoping to see her leave him during a certain part of the book, but that didn't happen.