Connecting Readers and Writers discussion
General
>
Readers: Opinions about prologues
date
newest »


I've found, on numerous google searches, workshops, and classes, that some authors/editors think they are a terrible idea, saying that readers just skip over them. There is also the question of why couldn't the 'prologue' just be 'chapter one'?
I admit that when I see PROLOGUE at the top of the page, I read it with a little attitude because I do kind of feel that it's keeping me from starting the actually story. But that's only when it's a few pages long, bordering on a short chapter. But if you give me a page or two - or something shorter - then I don't mind because it sets the tone of what I should/could expect from the story, and the shortness of it is kind of.... suspenseful.

I agree, Joe. While I sometimes don't mind a prologue, I have to ask - if you need a prologue, have you actually started the book in the right place? They are generally used to give some background to the story. My opinion is all background should be a natural part of the story anyway.

Especially if the Prologue takes place long before the main story, putting it in Chapter One just wouldn't feel right.

That being said, I believe they should be brief. If you go much past 2 pages, you need to eliminate it and integrate it into the story. The purpose of prologues is to give a quick, exciting set up, and the purpose of an epilogue is to give a fast follow up to the conclusion so you can see it's bigger effect "down the road" (and to throw in the surprise ending or red herring to shock your reader).
Thanks for reading. :)