Questioning Society discussion

74 views
Making It Better > FREEDOM OF SCIENCE

Comments Showing 51-100 of 181 (181 new)    post a comment »

message 51: by Ninja (new)

Ninja (ninjafanpire) | 616 comments Mod
GreenDaisy BlackStem wrote: "Because they developed themselves that way. Technically every different way of thinking and everything about us is birth defects"


Why are there people with birth defects? How does that benefit our species in any way? If we evolve to be better, why are some people slower at learning, or some people are blind, or deaf? That doesn't help our survival any.




message 52: by Daisy (new)

Daisy SUSANNAH: Okay fuck lard there is science and reason behind evaluation and there is NO fucking thing called Creationism! There is not thing as an all might GOD! okay there is rulers but... God is a figment of your imagination based off of Zeus okay! So stop being all Christian because I am Wiccan and Pagan!! I believe in Nyx the goddess of the night and I know that she didn't make me or the human! Nature and elevation did that thank very much.

That was my sister and her opinion of you....


message 53: by Ninja (new)

Ninja (ninjafanpire) | 616 comments Mod
Hey just chill out GreenDaisy there's no need to cuss someone out just because they believe different than you!


message 54: by Daisy (new)

Daisy I wasn't cussing! CAN YOU READ!! IT WAS MY SISTER!! GEEZ!!


message 55: by Daisy (new)

Daisy Having blonde hair, or blue eyes, or hazel eyes are birth defects, not having fur is a birth defect!


message 56: by Ninja (new)

Ninja (ninjafanpire) | 616 comments Mod
But no having fur, or having blue or green eyes or blond hair doesn't affect the way we live. Being blind affects our survival. If we were living, say, in the cave-man age, being blind would be a disadvantage, however, having blue eyes would not.


message 57: by Ninja (new)

Ninja (ninjafanpire) | 616 comments Mod
Okay, sorry, how am I supposed to know you have a sister? You could of at least bleeped out the words, some people find them offensive.


message 58: by Daisy (new)

Daisy But birth defects don't have to have a negative effect like having one eye green and one eye blue. We are just a whole bunch of birth defects from monkeys




message 59: by Daisy (new)

Daisy Well I don't and she doesn't and she wrote SUSANNAH: in large capital letters!!


message 60: by Ninja (new)

Ninja (ninjafanpire) | 616 comments Mod
And I am supposed to know who SUSANNAH is--how?


message 61: by Daisy (new)

Daisy ASK! BUT YOU SHOULD AT LEAST KNOW IT'S ANOTHER PERSON!


message 62: by Ninja (new)

Ninja (ninjafanpire) | 616 comments Mod
But eye color ISN'T a negative defect. If evolution is supposed to benefit a species and make them better, why are people born blind and stuff? How does that benefit us?


message 63: by Ninja (new)

Ninja (ninjafanpire) | 616 comments Mod
GreenDaisy BlackStem wrote: "ASK! BUT YOU SHOULD AT LEAST KNOW IT'S ANOTHER PERSON!"

Alright well I did say sorry


message 64: by Daisy (new)

Daisy because that's a birth defect that is negative not all birth defects are negative and not all are positive


message 65: by Lauren (new)

Lauren (djinni) "he complexity of humans, our minds, our nature, what's inside of us. That doesn't seem to have a shred of design to it?"

Why do we have appendixes, tailbones, tonsils? We are full of organs that serve no purpose. Nature is full of cobbled-together solutions, like the panda thumb. It's an evolved bit of bone from the wrist. Why to we have back pain, sinus drips and prolapsed uterus? All make sense if we didn't start out upright, but not if we were designed.

"Gravity just happened to come into existence, so that we all don't float away into oblivion?"

Gravity is a force cause by matter, that was already in the universe. The sun came first, and it's gravity pulled the Earth in. The Earth, slowly, accumulated more matter, and formed a gravity well. THE EARTH DID NOT COME INTO BEING FOR US, WE CAME INTO BEING AROUND THE CONDITIONS THE EARTH HAD. We are only here now, because there happened to be good conditions. If there was no good conditions (Goldilocks Zone) then we just wouldn't be here. It wasn't created for us. We sprung up around it.

"Why are there people with birth defects? How does that benefit our species in any way? If we evolve to be better, why are some people slower at learning, or some people are blind, or deaf? That doesn't help our survival any."

Not all mutations are bad. You'll learn this when you get to high school bio. A mutation is just a change in the nucleotide base/amino acid sequence. It can be good, neutral, or bad. A good example is an adaptation. A neutral example is skin color. A bad example is a mental disease.

Susannah, nice to meet you. :)


message 66: by korrinamoe (new)

korrinamoe Oh my gosh Lauren, I'm definitely staying out of this conversation. So confusing...


message 67: by Lauren (new)

Lauren (djinni) X)


message 68: by Daisy (new)

Daisy lol yeah...

You explain things so much better than me Lauren!!


message 69: by Lauren (new)

Lauren (djinni) :)

I've had a lot of practice.


message 70: by Milana (new)

Milana (tutuintopointe) | 779 comments Mod
I don't


message 71: by korrinamoe (new)

korrinamoe Lauren knows almost EVERYTHING. You could ask her a question and she'll probably be able to answer it easily and supported strongly...


message 72: by Lauren (new)

Lauren (djinni) aww! I<3 you Anuhea! *hugs*


message 73: by korrinamoe (new)

korrinamoe Yew are vewy smart Lauren. And I'm proud to know you. It's kinda scary when you throw facts at me. Because then I don't know what to say.


message 74: by Ninja (new)

Ninja (ninjafanpire) | 616 comments Mod
Lauren wrote: ""You'll learn this when you get to high school bio."


I've taken high school bio. I'm in college, I've graduated.


message 75: by Ninja (new)

Ninja (ninjafanpire) | 616 comments Mod
@Lauren


So gravity, the sun, and the earth have all always been here?




message 76: by Lauren (new)

Lauren (djinni) I assumed that you never learned about evolution because if anyone has, it's very obvious how much evidence it has for it. The only way to not believe it is to try.

They were formed when matter created a gravity well, and drew more matter to it, then all the matter cooled down, and you have the Earth. Gravity is a force that is created by the existence of matter. In the vacuum of space, with very little matter, there is no gravity.

As another point, just because one idea doesn't have every single fact for every second of everything, in no way implies that an opposing theory can win by default. There is no contest of only 2 ideas.


message 77: by korrinamoe (new)

korrinamoe *groans* I thought I finally got away from all the Earth, Sun thing...

What're we talkin' about again?


message 78: by Lauren (new)

Lauren (djinni) Ninjafanpire started in on gravity.


message 79: by korrinamoe (new)

korrinamoe Oh. F**ck. Gravity is probably one of the last things I want to talk about. What are the two ideas?


message 80: by Lauren (new)

Lauren (djinni) Why no gravity?

And to which two ideas are you referring to?


message 81: by Ninja (new)

Ninja (ninjafanpire) | 616 comments Mod
Lauren wrote: "I assumed that you never learned about evolution because if anyone has, it's very obvious how much evidence it has for it. The only way to not believe it is to try."


Well, I could replace evolution with God and have the same argument.


message 82: by Ninja (new)

Ninja (ninjafanpire) | 616 comments Mod
I have learned about evolution, there just seem to be too many flaws. We discussed it in class, and there were people on both sides. Teacher did try to be diplomatic, and corrected kids when they said God instead of Intelligent Design. He was pretty good about keeping things neutral.


message 83: by Lauren (new)

Lauren (djinni) "'Well, I could replace evolution with God and have the same argument. "

Evolution, in essence, is extremely simple and ACTUALLY explains something. God just brings up a whole host of questions, and doesn't actually explain anything. Where did he come from? Who created him? What are his abilities? It answers nothing.

"I love when people say this. It shows that they don't actually know anything about evolution. What are these flaws you speak of?"

http://www.spurgeon.org/images/pyroma...

They think animals instantly evolve over one generation and crap. Or alligators become ducks. They have no idea how it works at all.

Yes, what flaws are you referring to?


message 84: by Daisy (new)

Daisy Actually there was this weird island and aside from other creatures there was 1 speicies of monkey. 100 years later there were 21.


message 85: by Lauren (new)

Lauren (djinni) See? One species, due to various forces, can become different.


message 86: by Daisy (new)

Daisy Which is the base of evolution that has been proven as an actual happening


message 87: by Daisy (new)

Daisy lol that is sweet!1


message 88: by Lauren (new)

Lauren (djinni) Crocoduck is almost as silly as Comfort and the banana argument. X) For evidence, he compared a soda can to a banana. Apparently is fits our hand too perfectly to have "chanced" it.

((In the lines, we read the bananas are genetically modifided and bred for humans. ))


message 89: by Daisy (new)

Daisy okkkkkkaaay, it's curved fruit! We just found a way to hold it!!!


message 90: by Lauren (new)

Lauren (djinni) I NO!

Ray Comfort gives, not only religion, not only fundies, but stupid a bad name.


message 91: by Lauren (new)

Lauren (djinni) I JUST NOTICED YOUR PHOTO IS THE CROCODUCK! OMG

*teehee*


message 92: by Daisy (new)

Daisy lol


message 93: by Ninja (last edited Apr 27, 2009 09:26AM) (new)

Ninja (ninjafanpire) | 616 comments Mod
Nathan wrote: "I love when people say this. It shows that they don't actually know anything about evolution. What are these flaws you speak of?"


For example, why don't we see the many stages of evolution today? Sort of see it happening? If it takes billions of years, then shouldn't we see a part human part monkey? Like a caveman type? One change all the way up until we got humans? If it takes so long, there should be more missing links leading up from one species to the next. A monkey didn't just give birth to a human one day, did it?

Also, about useless organs. It has been shown that there may well be a use found for these seeming useless, leftover from evolution, body parts. There were 100 organs in humans that were supposedly useless and proof of evolution. However these have now been proven to have a use in our bodies. And by the way, about our tonsils being useless? They help to prevent throat infection. Look it up. And some of those bones you think are extra in whales, actually help the reproductive organs.


I found this quote: “Great periods of time make the possible likely but never make the impossible possible.”

And this one. This one is by Charles Darwin himself, and ya, I can tell you where he says it: "To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree." - Charles Darwin, "On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life," 1859, p. 155.


message 94: by Lauren (new)

Lauren (djinni) "For example, why don't we see the many stages of evolution today? Sort of see it happening? If it takes billions of years, then shouldn't we see a part human part monkey? Like a caveman type? One change all the way up until we got humans? If it takes so long, there should be more missing links leading up from one species to the next. A monkey didn't just give birth to a human one day, did it?"

We do have examples. Let's take, just for now, the eye. Some people think the eye is so complex, that it was designed. However, we have cells with no light sensitivity, cells with a light 'patch,' cells with a curved light patch, animals with a curved patch with fluid to focus, human eyes, and eagle eyes, with are more evolved then humans.

We did come from modern monkeys. Modern chimps and us have the same common ancestor. A monkey species became smart, and became us. The others, because they were isolated for whatever reason, didn't get as smart, if was a chain, more as a fork.

"Also, about useless organs. It has been shown that there may well be a use found for these seeming useless, leftover from evolution, body parts. There were 100 organs in humans that were supposedly useless and proof of evolution. However these have now been proven to have a use in our bodies. And by the way, about our tonsils being useless? They help to prevent throat infection. Look it up. And some of those bones you think are extra in whales, actually help the reproductive organs."

But, when they're removed, we can live without them. They do ave some function, but a useless function, as we survive without them .

"I found this quote: “Great periods of time make the possible likely but never make the impossible possible.”"

Many small improbabilities, like the eye, over time, add up. Read the book Climbing Mt. Improbable.

HAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAH

Darwin, Darwin, Darwin. You neglect to say, that after that, after he set up that straw man, he proceeds to explain exactly how the eye could have evolved. He pulled you in for the punch to hit harder. QUOTE FAIL


message 95: by Ninja (new)

Ninja (ninjafanpire) | 616 comments Mod
Why did Darwin call something absurd and then proceed to explain how it was possible?


message 96: by Lauren (new)

Lauren (djinni) lol Nathan

Darwin was pulling you in. It was a RHETORICAL QUESTION. a.k.a sarcasm.


message 97: by Lauren (new)

Lauren (djinni) lol Nathan

Darwin was pulling you in. It was a RHETORICAL QUESTION. a.k.a sarcasm.


message 98: by Lauren (new)

Lauren (djinni) "Every living organism is a stage of evolution, so we do see it. Also, if you want to see it happen right before your eyes, you can watch bateria evolve in a lab. You can actually witness it happening. "

We did a lab in school about the artificial selection we're creating with anti-bacteria sanitizers. The superbug idea.

"This wins the stupid statement of the day award"

LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Oo! oooOo! I know the function of the appendix!
>.>
<.<
>.>
It's function is to kill you by blowing up.


message 99: by Lauren (new)

Lauren (djinni) WIN!


message 100: by Ninja (new)

Ninja (ninjafanpire) | 616 comments Mod
Nathan wrote: "This wins the stupid statement of the day award. You admit that it takes millions of years and then expect it to happen right infront of your face and a large scale (ape to human)? I don't even know how to react to this because it is so ridiculous. "


I said IF. I never admitted to anything. I meant a half ape, half human. Like I said, shouldn't we see a missing link in between the two? An ape didn't give birth to a human, did it? So we should be able to see small changes in animals as they give birth each time. I mean, at least every 50 years or so, shouldn't we see a small change from human to monkey? And like I said, shouldn't there be a link in the middle that looks like both mixed together? If it does take millions of years, why aren't there more links in the animals chain?


back to top