Brain Pain discussion

This topic is about
Faustus
Faustus (Mamet) - Faust 2013
>
Discussion - Week Two - Faustus (Mamet) - Act Two
date
newest »


I usually figure that when a character is a compete jerk like that, they are a stand-in for the writer.
Whitney wrote: "I actually liked the way this subverted Goethe's Faust. Where Goethe's Faust goes from a desire to learn the secrets of the universe to a 'love conquers all' ideal, Mamet's Faust unhesitantly trad..."
Mamet didn't exactly flesh out this story. What secrets did the Magus reveal? Bupkiss. All he said was that there was a flaw in Faustus' theory and Faustus was dumbass enough to gamble over nothing. So the Magus wins a soul without revealing a thing other than Faustus' stupidity and blindness. Pretty thin stuff...
Mamet didn't exactly flesh out this story. What secrets did the Magus reveal? Bupkiss. All he said was that there was a flaw in Faustus' theory and Faustus was dumbass enough to gamble over nothing. So the Magus wins a soul without revealing a thing other than Faustus' stupidity and blindness. Pretty thin stuff...

Mamet doesn't allow his Faust any capacity for remorse or change. Instead of a cautionary tale about putting the quest for knowledge above all else, I saw it as a condemnation of those who do. The real caution is for those who indulge the Faust's of this world, as the Friend says in his speech (p. 75) about nurturing him for the sake of reflected glory.
As an aside, I also liked that the Magus used con-man level legerdemain to trick Faust instead of supernatural machinations: overheard conversation, slight of hand, misleading phrasing, and the target's own ego.
Yawn… Sorry, I don’t normally judge like this, but really David!
So what was he trying to say here? When a father puts his work before family they’re all doomed? Any thoughts on this?