Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Archived
>
The Announcement You've All Been Waiting For
date
newest »


Jozef wrote: "I don't see the point of importing data, every import I've seen has been wrong, or if not wrong significantly different to the book."
Highly unlikely. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirma...
Highly unlikely. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirma...
Nickname wrote: "can librarians have a look of all imports?"
You realize we import 100,000s of book record every week, right?
You realize we import 100,000s of book record every week, right?

The purpose of this site as I see it is to provide an as accurate record of a book as possible, The cover, the publisher, the pages, the date, and all authors who contributed with a description that if possible but not necessarily comes from the book cover or sleeve.
It shouldn't read like a review or advert.
Many of these imports especially for reference, probably because there aren't as many that have been changed by librarians have reviews, adverts as utter nonsense fed in from onix and various other places. Some of which have used Amazon reviews themselves and have subsequently been sent here. Yesterday one books had the title set to contain the ISBN of a totally different book by the same author. Another had the pages set to 0. A lot look like edits to a book previously added by a goodreads member. I'm wondering if these sites will come back on and change it back.

Possibly, but also we often don't go into correct records because they don't need editing, and therefore we don't see who imported them... :)

But does this mean that Amazon is going to be continually undoing our edits and replacing them with potentially incorrect information? Or are imports limited to new entries?
My understanding is that user-added (or -edited) data will continue to have higher priority than any of our imports.

There are a few massive errors made by a few librarians that are in the process of being remedied (and I mean, hundreds and hundreds by the same Librarian), but other than that, imports are a real PIA.
Also, of course, "that's why we have (FREE LABOR) librarians" is self explanatory :)
For example, WHY can't single initial (usually middle initial) without any punctuation (periods) be remedied upon import? They could be, of course, but it's easier/cheaper to leave them as is and hope that librarians fix them.
I don't anymore, unless I'm editing some other problem. Too boring, and frankly, a waste of time when something could be done about it before it hits the public pages.
End of rant.

And yes ingram was the one I couldn't think of.
As long as user edits have priority then we'll be okay.
Jozef wrote: "What are the most common errors made by librarians ?"
Please start a new thread if you'd like to pursue this. (Might be interesting, if posters can be careful not to link to specific users' logs, etc.)
Please start a new thread if you'd like to pursue this. (Might be interesting, if posters can be careful not to link to specific users' logs, etc.)

Do you have an example so the librarians can look at the change log to find where ingram onix or other data feed overwrote a field entered manually edited by a librarian? Not arguing that the data imports are always correct, just that they don't overwrite existing data.
Last I knew, the data imports were all set to never overwrite a manual change made by goodreads members or librarians. The only largish volume of problems I saw happen was when an particular editn left description blank in order to use defaul description (by being blank a data import would add a description).

I've added a lot of books that I've got in my library and a lot of those were either not on here or were imports that no one or very few had added and most of the info was missing or wrong. Mainly reference books, crafts, guides etc rather than novels. Most of the novels have been correct, I suspect because they're popular and have been updated by members.
There must be hundreds of thousands if not millions of reference books not even on here. People seem to be a lot keener to add novels so I suppose in one way it is at least adding them and there is a chance a librarian may stumble across them and update pages, author etc. So I do see the positive side to imports.
Off topic again really but regarding reference I think shelving system is off putting. A reference book is never really read its always to read by its nature and I don't really like adding them to 'to-read' I wonder if that puts people off.
But anway I shall keep an eye on the ones on my shelves

Vivienne wrote: "Will the import overwrite page numbers?"
Not if they were added by users. Possibly if they came from a different import source; sources have priority rankings, based on a number of factors.
Not if they were added by users. Possibly if they came from a different import source; sources have priority rankings, based on a number of factors.


I think the purpose of this thread has been served, so I am closing it.
Please feel free to start new thread(s) for any questions about related policies.
Please feel free to start new thread(s) for any questions about related policies.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
That's why we have librarians! :)"
Of course :) but can librarians have a look of all imports? It would be great if data imported from Amazon (or other, I found many other books coming from other sources with wrong data) will be added in a sort of list, so librarians can control and prevent any mistakes.