Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

Absolutely Not
This topic is about Absolutely Not
20 views
Book & Author Page Issues > Add ISBN & Description?

Comments Showing 1-7 of 7 (7 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Paw3pals (last edited May 23, 2013 04:22AM) (new)

Paw3pals | 1939 comments The author (I assume) http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/...
appears to have replaced most of her book descriptions with "OUT OF PRINT" and also put it in some of the titles? Instead of just adding the out of print info.

The below information is from my Ellora's Cave ebook copy of the below book - should/can/may it be updated?

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/72...

ISBN 9781419913457

Description:

Absolutely Not, Daisy Dexter Dobbs
After surviving on rabbit food for eighteen months, a transformed Maisy is set to exact revenge on her cheating ex. The fact that the SOB has dropped dead of a heart attack in the act of cheating on his new wife complicates matters.

Paying her final disrespects at the funeral home, Maisy meets Keller, a man so sexy and scintillating, she longs to jump his gorgeous bones right there in the mortuary. Unfortunately, once she discovers he’s the brother of the woman she caught in bed with her husband, Keller is as good as poison.

Maisy’s meddlesome boss and best friend, however, has other ideas. His attempts at playing matchmaker result in a series of hot, steamy, erotic consequences—as well as embarrassing mishaps, masquerades and misunderstandings.

Maisy, a certified chocoholic, copes in the most logical way possible—by trying to commit chocolatcide.

Reader Advisory: This book contains brief scenes of light bondage and graphic male/male sexual interaction.

Publisher Note: Previously published elsewhere as Shipping Sharon in 2001. Story has been greatly revised and lengthened for Ellora’s Cave.


message 2: by Emy (last edited May 23, 2013 04:32AM) (new)

Emy (emypt) | 5037 comments Not edited as the evidence needs to be left for the Staff/Super who deals with this)

http://www.goodreads.com/book/edits/7...

Leaving for a Super to revert. Hopefully a nice mail from one of them will alert her to the fact this is Not Done :) Saves going down the heavy heavy route straight off!

Thanks for noticing this one...


message 3: by Paw3pals (new)

Paw3pals | 1939 comments I thought it might have been done a while ago, as some of the books have other editions with descriptions.

This particular book does not have any any description and as I actually have it, thought to try to get the info in.

and you're welcome.


message 4: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Any librarian (who is comfortable doing so and knows how) can revert incorrect edits and add Librarian's Notes, FYI.

I got a few; maybe someone else can work on the rest.


message 5: by Emy (new)

Emy (emypt) | 5037 comments Out of interest Rivka - when is it best to leave edits to show you/Support, and when best to quietly revert?

also

If we do revert, is it best to put notes on to say why we shouldn't edit existing records? I usually do, but wasn't sure if this was best practice or just a habit I've picked up...


message 6: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Emy wrote: "Out of interest Rivka - when is it best to leave edits to show you/Support, and when best to quietly revert?"

If it is recent and/or a pattern of problem behavior, message Support. If it's a single case, or 4-6 months ago (or longer) with no recent repeats, just edit and Note. (The logs will show what changes were made and by whom, so it's often ok to revert even if you're messaging Support.)


Emy wrote: "If we do revert, is it best to put notes on to say why we shouldn't edit existing records?"

Yes.


message 7: by Emy (new)

Emy (emypt) | 5037 comments Thanks - that's the bit that worries me with fixings, and I dislike bothering support if it's not necessary/appropriate.


back to top