Q&A with Josh Lanyon discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
ARCHIVE (General Topics)
>
What Are you Reading?
message 8751:
by
Ame
(new)
Jul 10, 2015 10:17AM

reply
|
flag
Ije the Devourer of Books wrote: "Anne wrote: "Ije the Devourer of Books wrote: "I am reading The Animals: Love Letters Between Christopher Isherwood and Don Bachardy
It is such a fascinating book because it allow..."
This is the interesting thing about journals and journaling. Because while in real life I am political and active (not as Josh Lanyon -- that's not my job as an author) NONE of that goes into my journal. I think every so often I express worry or fear over an election, and that's about it.
And yet these are things that occupy my mind. Politics are a frequent source of conversation and concern in my life.
And yet if my journals should survive, it's going to look like I spent all my time worrying about the pool pump, my diet, and what books I'm hoping to buy. :-D
To say that it would make boring reading is an understatement.
It is such a fascinating book because it allow..."
This is the interesting thing about journals and journaling. Because while in real life I am political and active (not as Josh Lanyon -- that's not my job as an author) NONE of that goes into my journal. I think every so often I express worry or fear over an election, and that's about it.
And yet these are things that occupy my mind. Politics are a frequent source of conversation and concern in my life.
And yet if my journals should survive, it's going to look like I spent all my time worrying about the pool pump, my diet, and what books I'm hoping to buy. :-D
To say that it would make boring reading is an understatement.
Ame wrote: "Jordan wrote: "I've gotten into Cop Out and I have to say it's a very gripping story, and yet it's so sad! I just can't tear myself away and yet I want to cry over poor Davey. The a..."
Yeah, I keep wanting to do that too!
Yeah, I keep wanting to do that too!
Josh wrote: "Ije the Devourer of Books wrote: "Anne wrote: "Ije the Devourer of Books wrote: "I am reading The Animals: Love Letters Between Christopher Isherwood and Don Bachardy
It is such a..."
: D
I've been an avid, but very erratic journaler. For me it's similar to when I write poetry. I write when I'm angsty or during challenging times. In my teens and twenties, I would use a code for certain activities that I'd prefer not to be recognized by hypothetical nosey friends/relatives. Now, I'm not even certain what they all mean. : )
If my journals survive, any nosey descendants will discover a somewhat depressing (and wee bit pretentious) ancestor. ; )
It is such a..."
: D
I've been an avid, but very erratic journaler. For me it's similar to when I write poetry. I write when I'm angsty or during challenging times. In my teens and twenties, I would use a code for certain activities that I'd prefer not to be recognized by hypothetical nosey friends/relatives. Now, I'm not even certain what they all mean. : )
If my journals survive, any nosey descendants will discover a somewhat depressing (and wee bit pretentious) ancestor. ; )

It is such a..."
I have realised that the absence of political commentary is because these were love letters between the two men when they were away from each other. Having said this there are a few comments here and there which reveal their thoughts on some of the political issues of that time.
In one letter Bachardy writes about an argument he has had with his parents because of their racist views. Bachardy's housekeeper who was black, had baked him a cake to make up for Isherwood's absence, but he took the cake to his parents who then refused to eat it because it had been baked by a negro. They also mention the Vietnam war and the Six Day war.
It is a mammoth book though and filled with the trivia of their lives (bills, gossip, the beach, work, films, plays, friends) and yet it makes such addictive reading.
Josh wrote: "And yet if my journals should survive, it's going to look like I spent all my time worrying about the pool pump, my diet, and what books I'm hoping to buy. :-D"
Heh. :-)
Heh. :-)
Karen wrote: "In my teens and twenties, I would use a code for certain activities that I'd prefer not to be recognized by hypothetical nosey friends/relatives. Now, I'm not even certain what they all mean. : )"
Oh my God. I did this too. Only, I haven't remembered this for the longest time. But when I read your comment the most embarrassing code words for.. er... having sex, just popped into my mind. *red faced*
Oh my God. I did this too. Only, I haven't remembered this for the longest time. But when I read your comment the most embarrassing code words for.. er... having sex, just popped into my mind. *red faced*
Ije the Devourer of Books wrote: "Josh wrote: "Ije the Devourer of Books wrote: "Anne wrote: "Ije the Devourer of Books wrote: "I am reading The Animals: Love Letters Between Christopher Isherwood and Don Bachardy
..."
Ah. Yes. I regret to say that arguments do make it into my journal. And that creates a really unbalanced portrait because once the situation is resolved, I don't tend to think of it again. Which probably creates a much more brooding (if pool pump-obsessed) persona than is accurate.
..."
Ah. Yes. I regret to say that arguments do make it into my journal. And that creates a really unbalanced portrait because once the situation is resolved, I don't tend to think of it again. Which probably creates a much more brooding (if pool pump-obsessed) persona than is accurate.
Johanna wrote: "Karen wrote: "In my teens and twenties, I would use a code for certain activities that I'd prefer not to be recognized by hypothetical nosey friends/relatives. Now, I'm not even certain what they a..."
Ha! We should all be forgiven our early poetical efforts. That goes without saying. :-D
Ha! We should all be forgiven our early poetical efforts. That goes without saying. :-D
Josh wrote: "Ije the Devourer of Books wrote: "Josh wrote: "Ije the Devourer of Books wrote: "Anne wrote: "Ije the Devourer of Books wrote: "I am reading [book:The Animals: Love Letters Between Christopher Ishe..."
That's my past journaling too. I only ever wrote in my journal or blog when something bad happened or I was in a mood or having a crappy day. So, yeah, there was a reason online friends used to worry about me. :-)
That's my past journaling too. I only ever wrote in my journal or blog when something bad happened or I was in a mood or having a crappy day. So, yeah, there was a reason online friends used to worry about me. :-)

..."
Thanks for the ongoing review, Ije. I requested my library get the book because it sounds fascinating to me.

My old journals are nothing but angst and hand-wringing because I only wrote when I was in an uproar about something (and when you're twenty, there's a lot to be in an uproar about!) and writing helped me sort it all out. I pretty much stopped writing in my journal a lot when I finished university. It's as if all the wild drama kind of petered out. :) I'm keen to read all those old journals. I imagine they will be quite entertaining. They're packed up in a box in my garage and someday I will dig them out and laugh. :)
Johanna wrote: "Oh my God. I did this too. Only, I haven't remembered this for the longest time. But when I read your comment the most embarrassing code words for.. er... having sex, just popped into my mind. *red faced* "
And another funny thing is that this pretty much dates us from these contemporary tell-all publicly days. : )
And another funny thing is that this pretty much dates us from these contemporary tell-all publicly days. : )

Read and listen here:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/harper-le...
I'm still not sure if I want to read rest of the book.
Josh wrote: "Johanna wrote: "Karen wrote: "In my teens and twenties, I would use a code for certain activities that I'd prefer not to be recognized by hypothetical nosey friends/relatives. Now, I'm not even certain what they a..."
Ha! We should all be forgiven our early poetical efforts. That goes without saying. :-D"
:-)
Ha! We should all be forgiven our early poetical efforts. That goes without saying. :-D"
:-)
Karen wrote: "Johanna wrote: "Oh my God. I did this too. Only, I haven't remembered this for the longest time. But when I read your comment the most embarrassing code words for.. er... having sex, just popped in..."
Very true. :-)
Very true. :-)

No, I read the New York Times review yesterday. I will never believe Harper Lee wanted this first draft of what she rewrote into the classic "To Kill A Mockingbird" published. She never sought publication of it when she was in good health and she had it for more than 50 years. It was her lawyer who discovered it and negotiated a publishing deal that the thing saw the light of day. I think this is a case of making a fast buck, possible manipulation of an elderly woman in failing health and it certainly tarnishes the legacy of her characters. Her work. Sad. Not reading it.


No, I read the New York Times review yesterday. I will never believe Harper Lee wanted this first draft of what she rewrot..."
Those are pretty much my feelings. I did read the first chapter because it's hard to avoid spoilers anyway and can see why she may not have wanted it published.
Karen wrote: "Johanna wrote: "Oh my God. I did this too. Only, I haven't remembered this for the longest time. But when I read your comment the most embarrassing code words for.. er... having sex, just popped in..."
Yes. It is definitely a different mindset.
I look at stuff people post now and it is amazing to me. But frankly not amazing in a good way. I think most of these folks, especially younger people who have no clue how judgmental other humans are, will ultimately regret that much candor. Especially because--as we've discussed--these ruminations are only a tiny part of the picture.
Yes. It is definitely a different mindset.
I look at stuff people post now and it is amazing to me. But frankly not amazing in a good way. I think most of these folks, especially younger people who have no clue how judgmental other humans are, will ultimately regret that much candor. Especially because--as we've discussed--these ruminations are only a tiny part of the picture.
Carlita wrote: "I guess there is value for those studying the process of writing to see how the rejected first draft became the classic. I would feel much better had Lee sought its publication herself years ago. I..."
Oh boy. That certainly doesn't sound good, but if she never wanted it published and he pushed for it, I'm glad someone's looking into it. I'm not planning on reading it, mostly because I just don't have the time.
Oh boy. That certainly doesn't sound good, but if she never wanted it published and he pushed for it, I'm glad someone's looking into it. I'm not planning on reading it, mostly because I just don't have the time.
Valerie wrote: "So, did anyone read the first chapter of Go Set a Watchman?
Read and listen here:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/harper-le...
I'm s..."
I started it, but decided to wait until I had the complete book.
I think I'd rather read it after all the hoopla has died down, so I can form my own unbiased opinion.
She's a competent writer, and assuming this isn't her very first unfinished draft, the book will be perfectly readable. Will it live up to Mockingbird?
Could anything?
She's not just competing with her own work, she's competing with people's perception of that work.
It will be decades before Go Set a Watchman can actually be viewed with any kind of critical detachment. There is no critic living today who can view it with true objectivity. That's going to be up to future generations.
Read and listen here:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/harper-le...
I'm s..."
I started it, but decided to wait until I had the complete book.
I think I'd rather read it after all the hoopla has died down, so I can form my own unbiased opinion.
She's a competent writer, and assuming this isn't her very first unfinished draft, the book will be perfectly readable. Will it live up to Mockingbird?
Could anything?
She's not just competing with her own work, she's competing with people's perception of that work.
It will be decades before Go Set a Watchman can actually be viewed with any kind of critical detachment. There is no critic living today who can view it with true objectivity. That's going to be up to future generations.
Josh wrote: "Valerie wrote: "So, did anyone read the first chapter of Go Set a Watchman?
Read and listen here:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/harper-le...-..."
So very true.
Read and listen here:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/harper-le...-..."
So very true.

As always, you have a way of bringing reason to a subject. I think you've got it exactly right though, I am highly biased. I adore "To Kill A Mockingbird" as it is written and I don't want my perceptions changed. Future generations will make the call and that's cool with me.
Carlita wrote: "I guess there is value for those studying the process of writing to see how the rejected first draft became the classic. I would feel much better had Lee sought its publication herself years ago. I..."
Oh dear. I didn't know these things about the Go Set a Watchman release.
Oh dear. I didn't know these things about the Go Set a Watchman release.
Josh wrote: "Valerie wrote: "So, did anyone read the first chapter of Go Set a Watchman?
Read and listen here:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/harper-le...-..."
Yes, probably a good idea to let it sit for awhile before reading it. I, too, love To Kill a Mockingbird.
Read and listen here:
http://www.wsj.com/articles/harper-le...-..."
Yes, probably a good idea to let it sit for awhile before reading it. I, too, love To Kill a Mockingbird.
Carlita wrote: "Josh wrote: I started it, but decided to wait....
As always, you have a way of bringing reason to a subject. I think you've got it exactly right though, I am highly biased. I adore "To Kill A Mocki..."
Yes, that book is just too meaningful to too many of us to be viewed with objectivity.
And the drama surrounding its release is going to color its reception as well.
One thing for sure, it is the biggest literary event I can remember. :-)
As always, you have a way of bringing reason to a subject. I think you've got it exactly right though, I am highly biased. I adore "To Kill A Mocki..."
Yes, that book is just too meaningful to too many of us to be viewed with objectivity.
And the drama surrounding its release is going to color its reception as well.
One thing for sure, it is the biggest literary event I can remember. :-)

Another good story I finished this weekend was The Gully Snipe a typical fantasy, perhaps more for YA than romance readers, but I read both kinds, so...but on this occasion I really would wish for the author to have a better editor. I have noticed this with this author before, a good story teller with a message, but once in a while the writing gets so clumsy and the dialogue so stilted I get thrown out of the story. Thanks to the story itself, I do get back in though. There is also a kind of frame- story that is quite unnecessary, I thnk.

I read it since yesterday, Alison has recommended it. I like it a lot!


There are also three shorts which came out a while ago, featuring Simon and Declan: Just Like Florence Nightingale, The First Supper, and When You Run, You Eventually Have to Stop


Yay, now I just need to get to August where I'll have some money again.
I hope they try again with audio, 3rd time's the charm, right?


I just bought it. It's on a VERY long 'To Read' list. I've had a real problem getting motivated to read lately. I've taken to listening to old favorites on Audible. Not a bad thing at all though!



I'm about 60 pages into it and it's just as great as the first two. Simon is still so very Simon, and Declan is wonderful as always.

I got this from Audible a while back when I had a credit that needed using. Sissy Spacek was the narrator. She did an excellent job.



I have 348 books on my to-read shelf, only 56 is in my wishlist

I got this from Audible a while back when I had a credit t..."
Yes, I have that, too. I think I'll start it tonight.
I need to go through my to-read shelf. I've been going through my wish list to get it back down to 100 items. I've been taking off books with low reviews and things I've changed my mind on. I've had certain books on my wish list for years though. *shakes head*

"How is it that a man wants to be made sad by the sight of tragic sufferings that he could not bear in his own person? Yet the spectator does not want to feel sorrow, and it is actually his feeling of sorrow that he enjoys. Surely this is the most wretched lunacy? For the more a man feels such sufferings in himself, the more he is moved by the sight of them on stage. Now when a man suffers himself, it is called misery; when he suffers in the suffering of another, it is called pity. But how can the unreal sufferings of the stage possibly move pity? The spectator is not moved to aid the sufferer but merely to be sorry for him; and the more the author of these fictions makes the audience grieve, the better they like him. If the tragic sorrows of the characters B whether historical or entirely fictitious B be so poorly represented that the spectator is not moved to tears, he leaves the theatre unsatisfied and full of complaints; if he is moved to tears, he stays to the end, fascinated and reveling in it."
-- The Confessions of Augustine, Book III

For those who remember Wicked Gentlemen- «It's about The Book» is posting the new short story in parts RIGHT NOW!
http://itsaboutthebook.com/2015/07/13...
Antonella wrote: "Post by Ginn Hale half an hour ago:
For those who remember Wicked Gentlemen- «It's about The Book» is posting the new short story in parts RIGHT NOW!
http://itsaboutthebook.com/201..."
Thanks for the notice. Loved it.
For those who remember Wicked Gentlemen- «It's about The Book» is posting the new short story in parts RIGHT NOW!
http://itsaboutthebook.com/201..."
Thanks for the notice. Loved it.

For those who remember Wicked Gentlemen- «It's about The Book» is posting the new short story in parts RIGHT NOW!
http://itsaboutthebook.com/201..."
Great little snippet. Ginn really knows how to write, I actually felt wet when reading :).
Antonella wrote: "Post by Ginn Hale half an hour ago:
For those who remember Wicked Gentlemen- «It's about The Book» is posting the new short story in parts RIGHT NOW!
http://itsaboutthebook.com/201..."
Oh, how delightful!
For those who remember Wicked Gentlemen- «It's about The Book» is posting the new short story in parts RIGHT NOW!
http://itsaboutthebook.com/201..."
Oh, how delightful!

For those who remember Wicked Gentlemen- «It's about The Book» is posting the new short story in parts RIGHT NOW!
http://itsaboutthebook.com/201..."
Can't wait to read! Thanks, Antonella!
Antonella wrote: "Post by Ginn Hale half an hour ago:
For those who remember Wicked Gentlemen- «It's about The Book» is posting the new short story in parts RIGHT NOW!
http://itsaboutthebook.com/201..."
Oh cool! Thank you for letting us know, Antonella!
For those who remember Wicked Gentlemen- «It's about The Book» is posting the new short story in parts RIGHT NOW!
http://itsaboutthebook.com/201..."
Oh cool! Thank you for letting us know, Antonella!

For those who remember Wicked Gentlemen- «It's about The Book» is posting the new short story in parts RIGHT NOW!
http://itsaboutthebook.com/201..."
Marvellous. Thanks, Antonella! :)
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Subtle Bodies (other topics)Husband Material (other topics)
Sing for the Coming of the Longest Night (other topics)
A Shattered Silver Crown (other topics)
A Shattered Silver Crown (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Jordan Castillo Price (other topics)Alexis Hall (other topics)
Katherine Fabian (other topics)
Iona Datt Sharma (other topics)
Cynthia Zhang (other topics)
More...