Franz Kafka discussion
"Kafkaesque"
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Nathanimal
(new)
May 03, 2013 08:41AM

reply
|
flag


How many writers have accomplished this?
That's is something reserved for the genius.
Harold Bloom mention something about this in: http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/51...

Department of Motor Vehicles. Kafkaesque?
The Republican Party. Kafkaesque?
A weekend at my in-laws. Kafkaesque?
Joking aside, I do think it's a useful adjective. After all, the point is that Kafka described a kind of modern anxiety that had not been described before. And we need new words for new things.
I think the point of the article that I linked to is that the meaning of "Kafkaesque" has been so reduced by over use that it only cartoons what is actually going on in Kafka's work. Or perhaps like all clichés it's just stopped meaning anything a long time ago. Sure, these are reasonable complaints.
Still, every time some scholar smugly rolls his eyes when someone says "Kafkaesque" all I hear is: "You think you know Kafka? You don't know Kafka. I know Kafka." Which seems worse to me than the sin of uttering a cliché.

Even though I don't know Kafka or understand half of him anyway, there is something there within me that clicks with his writing. I have no idea why. And I don't even care. Amateur, presumptuous readers have this same smugness when it comes to James Joyce's Ulysses. I'm comfortable with confessing my 'dumbness' because this, then, keeps your mind open to new and different interpretations, rather than getting you haughty over nothing.

" Would you date a person whose writing style on a dating website registers as Kafkaesque?"from www.jewcy.com