Crime, Mysteries & Thrillers discussion

This topic is about
Before I Go to Sleep
Archive - Group Reads
>
Before I Go To Sleep - May 2013
message 1:
by
Leigh
(new)
-
added it
May 01, 2013 08:14PM

reply
|
flag

I won't summarize the book. I'll just give some opinions on it.
At first, this book sometimes seems slow and repetitious because of Christine’s same routine every day. But it’s also more and more mysterious with each new memory.
This book has too many questions, some of which are never fully answered:
Why does Ben keep most information from Christine? Does he think he’s helping her, or is there some devious reason?
And why, when Christine asks about a new memory, does he seem hesitant to answer? Does he tell her the truth? What is he hiding and why?
And is this Doctor Nash really who he says he is? Is he really involved for the reasons he states?
I have first-hand knowledge about head injuries and comas. Here is what I know: There are several different types of amnesia and a few different possible causes, brain trauma being just one of them. Brain trauma is the cause Ben claims to Christine. But is he being honest?
Christine retains memory for a day, only to lose it all overnight while she’s sleeping. Is something other than or in addition to brain trauma the cause? What else is going on?
As for this book's implausibility, when this is referring to Christine’s amnesia, that is probably easier for me to believe because I, too, had amnesia as a result of a severe head injury and still occasionally regain memories I didn’t know I had forgotten, even after 34 years. For a short time, I couldn’t even retain day-to-day memories. So I know Watson wasn’t completely making this up, just stretching the truth.
Although the amnesia described in BEFORE I GO TO SLEEP isn’t implausible, I did catch things that are. For example, at the suggestion of Doctor Nash, Christine keeps a journal. Every day she describes that day, so she knows what happened in the days before. BEFORE I GO TO SLEEP is her journal. How does she have the time to both write it (in longhand) and then reread it every day along with anything else she does that day?
BEFORE I GO TO SLEEP forces the reader to become tense with suspicion. It is this aspect that I think must be the reason the book is such a bestseller and garners so much praise. But it has lots of problems.


I suppose the character might be a quick reader. But you are right that the reader has to suspend a certain amount of belief.

I suppose the character might be a quick reader. But you are rig..."
I gave this book four stars after I read it last year, and I don't know why. I had quite a few problems with it. (See above.) I think I'll change that rating.

'As I sleep, my mind will erase everything I did today. I will wake up tomorrow as I did this morning. Thinking I'm still a child. Thinking I have a whole lifetime of choice ahead of me ...' Memories define us. So what if you lost yours every time you went to sleep? Your name, your identity, your past, even the people you love—all forgotten overnight. And the one person you trust may only be telling you half the story. Welcome to Christine's life.
So, in your opinion, is this a book that lingers in your mind and sticks with you for awhile? If so, why?
Christine doesn’t feel a strong sense of love for her husband, but wonders if that is normal after so many years of marriage. Do you think it’s inevitable that a marriage changes in this way?
How do you think it would feel to be in Christine's situation?
Do you think women reaching the age of fifty tend to feel the same as Christine, as if they've missed something in life or wish things would have been differently?
How important do you think your memory is to you? How do you think you'd adjust to Christine's type of situation? Would you deal with it the same as her? If not, what would you do differently?
What do you think or how do you feel about Dr. Nash?
Why do you think Christine does some of the things she does?
Do you think it was right of Ben to keep things from Christine for her own benefit? If not, how do you think he should have reacted differently?
What did you think about the ending? Would you have changed anything about it? If so, what?

It did but not for good reasons. I kept wondering about things that just didn't add up.

I know how it would feel. If you're surrounded by people who love you, you know you'll get through it just fine. Where was the rest of Christine's family? No one loved her except this one man? These were just two of the questions I had that were never adequately answered.

He was another question never adequately answered.

There's an answer to that, but it would be a spoiler. Don't ask that until you've read the book. Ben is one questionable character who IS explained.


The entire book is full of frustrating things.


What do you think about the characters? I was always suspicious of Ben and Nash, and who wouldn't be? I liked Christine, I felt her fears and anxiety, but always wondered was this real, a dream, staged?
Do you like the storyline itself? Do you like the plot flow, plot twists? In the beginning, the daily journaling became monotonous, but by the middle of the book, it did pick up, and I couldn't put it down. I wondered if Christine didn’t have amnesia and was actually writing this as a book.
What are your final thoughts on the book? Was the ending satisfying and complete? I didn’t see the twist of events and look forward to this being made into a movie. I liked the ending, a little creepy, Twilight Zone-ish.

This is possible. It's more than possible, as a matter of fact.
After someone has been in a coma as a result of a head injury, they have amnesia to some extent, which lasts longer the longer they have been in a coma. But they may still remember how to do some daily functions.
This book has many unlikely scenarios, but this isn't one of them.

Yes but not in the way presented in this book.

Me, too, but also her son. Where the heck was he? This whole story wouldn't have happened if he had been around. Gees, if it was my mother, I would have been there every day.

I wondered the same thing. After all, that would have made sense of all parts of the story that didn't make sense.
The journal writing WAS SO monotonous! Not only monotonous, though; it wasn't possible for her to reread everything every day AND have a life AND write about that life every day. There aren't enough hours in the day.


No, you're right. But readers can just go with it and the author can get away with things like that when the other parts of the story have explanations. In this case, though, the story was full of questions, things that should have been explained but weren't. So I wasn't thrilled about this book.





Lol, my bad.



I get so much joy and pleasure from being able to share great books, especially when others love them!

I was critical of this book the whole time I read it because I know firsthand about amnesia due to head injury. I even looked into amnesia because I know it's not all as I experienced it. But much of this book takes way too much poetic license.

That's really interesting; I didn't realize it. You liked it, and I didn't. So that could be due to our nationality?
I've heard people speak of "British humor," and I have noticed often in movies a British humor that I don't think is funny at all. So I suppose we could have different tastes in books as well.


Memento:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0209144/
Fifty First Dates, starring, I think, Cameron Diaz."
This book reminded me of Memento as well. But it is different enough to be original. I figured out what was going on about 1/3 of the way through, but I wasn't confident about it until the reveal. Great first effort from a promising author.

While that's true, unless fiction is written to be science fiction or fantasy, which this book is not, it had better get the facts straight, especially if the facts are readily available. Also, you can look at this story like a puzzle; all the pieces should fit, and here all of them don't.

Memento:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0209144/
Fifty First Dates, starring, I think, Cameron Diaz."
I'm going to get those from Netflix. Thanks.

I just watched 50 First Dates on tv this weekend, too. Goofy, but funny sometimes


I'm glad you enjoyed this. I didn't, probably because I have firsthand experience to compare it with.

As I recall, after I read this book I looked up the author on the Internet. He WAS accurate about some aspects of a head injury and coma, but I believe he said that was accident. The book wasn't meant to be medically accurate. He did a little research on this condition, not a lot.

I mostly agree with you. However, I would add that the fiction that is innacurate should be the type of fiction that is obviously not meant to be real, such as science fiction and fantasy. I think there are some types of fiction that really should try to be accurate.
In the case of this book, I understood it as a type NOT meant to be accurate, more science fiction. So all the many inaccuracies were fine with me.
For me, this book was fine but silly and certanly not what all its great reviews led me to expect.
