Movies We've Just Watched discussion

36 views
Foreign Films > Hunger (Steve McQueen)

Comments Showing 1-3 of 3 (3 new)    post a comment »
dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Alex DeLarge (new)

Alex DeLarge | 851 comments This was just released theatrically in the US but I ordered the import DVD and watched on my own big screen. This will probably make my Top Ten list for 2009...but the year is still young.

HUNGER (Steve McQueen, 2008, UK) A bare bones narrative that focuses its stark lens upon Bobby Sands’ hunger strike but whose recipe is food for thought, a prescient menu of Bush-era polemics where the ends justify the means. Director Steve McQueen’s poetic vision structures the film around a 20-minute dialogue shot entirely without edit, an unapologetic and dense moral conflict between Sands and an Irish Priest: two figures whose objectives are shared but beliefs towards a political and spiritual resolution differ greatly. During the long conversation, McQueen finally cuts to close-up on Sands and thus begins his hunger strike approximately halfway through the story. The film begins with the incarceration of another inmate, the dehumanization complete with naked aggression and brutal off-camera beating, a fresh open head-wound in close-up a telltale sign of life in the Maze prison. The prisoners begin their protest by smearing their cells with feces and remaining unwashed, unwilling even to submit to the clownish uniforms and forced baths. McQueen crosscuts meager existence in the prison with a guard’s life outside, as he soaks his bloodied knuckles in the sink, eats a hot breakfast, says goodbye to his wife and checks for a car-bomb. The poison of torture infects everyone involved and transforms the just into the unjust: the warders become even more tainted than their wards. The second half concerns Bobby Sands decline into skeletal protest, his body wasting away but his cause hopefully growing more powerful. We witness the emotional turmoil of his parents and experience his mind reverting backwards into time, a lonely runner in a long distance race, his younger self seeming to understand this self-destructive decision and the complex causes that brought it about: he is at peace with himself. McQueen strategically fails to navigate the troubled waters of a specific cause: he explains little about the background of the characters or history. Instead, he seems more interested in conforming to a more general statement about torture and the treatment of prisoners, as Dostoyevsky said: “ The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons.” (A)


message 2: by Phillip (last edited Apr 09, 2009 08:37AM) (new)

Phillip | 10781 comments "director" steve mc queen....you really threw me there for a second, alex. this sounds really interesting, thanks for the great review!

poor dostoevsky, he got to observe the russian prison system up close and personal...


message 3: by Phillip (last edited Apr 12, 2010 11:47PM) (new)

Phillip | 10781 comments finally got around to seeing this and was blown away by it. it would have made my top ten last year if i had seen it in time. alex was such a crafty boy on this one - i missed it when it hit the theaters. i'm thankful criterion saw fit to release it - it's a gorgeous print.

best not to say too much about this one. alex's review is spot on, as always. i would say that mc queen has a unique style that really celebrates the art of photographing something. he also has a unique handle on structure. long takes with very little dialogue (with the exception of the central conversation) ... the story is told mainly through images and you feel the real time aspect of captivity and dehumanization, and the strength that it takes to endure it.


back to top