Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
discussion
Why didn't Voldemort have red eyes in the movie?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Lisa
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Mar 03, 2013 12:11PM

reply
|
flag




Daniel was allergic to the color changing contact lenses hence the reason his eyes were the wrong color. So that's not really the movie makers fault

Yes,I know that(I did point it out).I was talking about the younger Lily.
'Ultimately, filmmakers decided that Voldemort's eyes would need to be altered for the films, as they believed the red eyes described in the novels would inhibit expression and distract audiences. ''If you didn't leave an enormous chunk of human being there,'' says Goblet of Fire director Mike Newell, ''then he wasn't going to scare you.'' ' Harry Potter Page to Screen: The Complete Filmmaking Journey


Why was Lily cast as a 40 year old woman when she died at 21?
Why was Bill's character destroyed? He was so cool in the books. I didn't even noticed he was there in the movies until someone point him out and asked (in a very offended tone) "IS THAT SUPPOSED TO BE BILL WEASLEY?"
It was. And it was terrible.




i think it's cause the first movie was made for like 11 y/o kids so they didn't want it to look too scary for them and as the series went on they probably didn't wanna change a character's appearance mid-series

fun fact: not only was daniel radcliffe allergic to green lenses (he wore them for one scene - the goodbye scene at the end of the first movie which was filmed first), he was also allergic to the glasses!


don;t they make every color under the sun? i've seen pitch black huge ones too. that is really not a problem.

don;t they make every color under the sun? i've seen pitch black huge ones t..."
I was wrong anyway. My daughter's godfather owns a video company, he does documentary films for a living (he helped with the one about the Boys of Company C whose plane was shot down over Binh Dinh Province in Vietnam), he said they could have done it a different way even if they didn't have lenses of that particular color. He says they could have made them have rainbow-colored eyes these days. I thought they must have used lenses to do it. I don't know everything he knows, including the fact that the director, producer or screenwriter "probably made an executive decision not to use red eyes." They have seemingly millions of reasons for doing so and some are as simple as one person wants the production to reflect his own desires as opposed to the author's or screenwriter. Doing a movie production is like trying to herd cats, he said. Getting a group of people to agree on the same thing when most of them want to run the whole show from their own point of view isn't easy. Some people think there's an I in teamwork.
He thinks someone should ask the people who made the movie that question or try to find an interview of someone discussing why they didn't do it. Then he'll know for sure what the reason is. I won't know. I read a movie interview by a guy who made the film 'The Redwood Massacre.' Richard, my daughter's godfather, read between the lines to know what he was really saying. I didn't even know the lines existed until he informed me of "movie-speak," which is akin to double-speak or crypto-speak. Meaning working in the field gives one an advantage.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (other topics)
Books mentioned in this topic
Harry Potter Page to Screen: The Complete Filmmaking Journey (other topics)Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (other topics)