Historical Fictionistas discussion
The Front Parlor
>
How did you get into Historical Fiction?
message 251:
by
Gary
(new)
Feb 28, 2017 08:43AM

reply
|
flag

I watched nothing but costume dramas and bbc history documentaries my entire twenties.Im still a great antiquarian like my fourth great grandfather(yes I'm into family history too).
Strangely despite all this I had never read historical fiction,I had always seen it but I just don't read novels, but now I've started and I really love it.
My favourite periods are Victorian,Edwardian and ancient Celtic.
I've had so many dreams of past lives,that to me it's simply that I come from other times that I'm so antiquated.Also that the past is just so much more romantic.

I tend to agree. Something about the complacency and dehumanization of the modern era.


Hmm, I'm afraid I have to disagree here. Powerful stories are unfolding every day in peoples' lives all over the world. I know for me, what draws me to HF is escapism. I can read about very serious issues and events, but with the knowledge that, however they turned out, they're complete; finished; in the past. In my comfortable life, it's easy to see the small-scale, and be complacent, but tides and patterns are moving in the larger world all the time: suffering and nobility are played out every day, we just can't see the forest for the trees sometimes.









Actually I was bit disappointed when I found out cyclops didn't exist. Dad never explained the difference between history, religion and mythology. It took a while to sort it all out.

Two factors led me to historical fiction, starting when I was a young teenager back in the '70s. First, I grew up in a fly-over town in the heart of fly-over country. As far back as I can remember, I ached--physically ached--to get out. We had a beautiful Carnegie library two blocks from my house and I checked out every age-appropriate (and a lot of age-inappropriate) books on ancient Greece, Rome, Egypt, Renaissance Europe, any book about any place other than where I was. Second, my parents subscribed to Book of the Month Club and in the '70s, BOTM loved James Michener. So Michener was my historical fiction threshold drug. I just wrapped myself up in those door-stopper length books of his and couldn't get enough. Since he was, IMHO, one of the true masters of the genre, he set the bar mighty high for me. I've been reading (and now writing) historical fiction for the last 40+ years.


Thanks, Abigail. That's very kind. In full disclosure--and at the opposite pole to dear Jane A--I've also read every word ever written by Ernest Hemingway. At least once. Even his handful of published and truly execrable poems. (There's a very good reason one doesn't think of Papa H as a poet...)

Totally agree about the focus on rich people and nobility. The whole "Downton Abbey" aesthetic is wonderful spin sugar candy and fun, but not very nourishing and you get sick of it soon enough.
I get some of this same reaction to HF writers who have to--just HAVE TO--have their characters meet and interact with every famous person imaginable from their era. (Looking at YOU, Ken Follett!) It comes across so contrived most of the time. I mean, if Winston Churchill had spent as much time with as many improbable people as the quantum of WW1 and WW2-era HF novels would have us believe, he'd have had not time to sleep, let alone govern.

A friend of mine wrote a spoof with Winnie the Pooh characters speaking Papa-ese. Truly sublime.

To make matters worse, I went to the bullfights in Spain, of course... and loved them. I may be completely irredeemable, I'm afraid.

Sorry about that, but honest mistake!

The fiction section was organized alphabetically by author with no divisions at all for westerns, mysteries, historical fiction, etc. This was probably in the early 1950s or maybe earlier. I don't recall how old I was then. I was born in 1940.
Anyway with no concept of genre I just read books. I read paperbacks almost always and I picked my books based mostly on whether the description on the back cover seemed interesting.
A lot of the books I enjoyed took place in the long past, often in biblical times and even much earlier. I never really thought of them has "historical novels". I just read them and enjoyed them.
I don't think I became aware of historical novels until sometime in the mid 1970s and 1980s when bookstores began getting serious about dividing their shelves into genres.
By then I'd read a lot by authors such as Frank Slaughter, Lloyd C. Douglas, Frank Yerby, Mika Waltari, Mary Renault, Pearl S. Buck as well as books like "Ben Hur", "Quo Vadis". I never really realized when I read these that they were historical novels. I just read them and enjoyed them.
I've never become fond of the idea of genre. It seems like a watered down approach to reading. I'm stuck with it now and I try to make the best of it.
I probably read more novels that take place in the present than in the past but I read a lot of both. I still don't think of that when I go looking for a book. In fact my current book, a book that takes place in 17th century New England, caught my eye by chance when I was really thinking of finding a mystery.
When I think back on the best books I've read a lot of them are historical novels, maybe most of them, so maybe I am a historical novel fan.
Barry


well said, I agree


I feel much the same, although my writing focus is in Old China. China's dynastic history interests me much much more than its modern history. My reading interests cover world history though.

A good story can take place in any time or any location. It's what happens and who it happens to and how it happens that makes it a good story.
Barry



I love that last line of your post, Barry. I write historical fiction, so it really resonates with me. I'm going to stick this up on the wall of my office: "A good story can take place in any time or any location. It's what happens and who it happens to and how it happens that makes it a good story."





Oh, Jessika! Don't feel the least bit self-conscious about admitting that your HistFic 'gateway drug' was the "American Girl" series. My daughter devoured those, too. And since it's true confession time, I think my 'gateway drug' to reading ANY great literature was the "Classics Illustrated" comic books!


Yep, been there, too. They were my dad's Playboy's. Took me a few more years to learn to say, "I only read it for the movie reviews" with a straight face.

I got into historical fiction via American Girl, too! Who was your favourite character? Mine was Felicity.



And a good trilogy it is. If people are interested in Westerns, they should read the "hard land to rule" books..... just saying.


I can't imagine being embarrassed about having read something. When I was young I tried everything. Some of it was real garbage and some of that I liked. I read the Shell Scott books by Richard S. Prather as a kid and loved them. I reread one a few months ago to see if I'd still like it and it wasn't bad at all. I have a couple more of those. They're mindless thrillers about a detective who judges women by how much their behind spreads when they sit down, but they're really fun. I see nothing to be ashamed about.
I even read a few romance novels to see if I liked those. I'm not ashamed of reading them although if I'd liked that kind of tricky and dishonest writing I'd sure have been ashamed. And I won't be ashamed at the sort of feedback I'll probably get for that mean remark. :)
Reading is fun. Guilty pleasures need calories and sugar and books have neither. :)
Barry
Books mentioned in this topic
The Amethyst Ring (other topics)Shōgun (other topics)
The Captive (other topics)
The Feathered Serpent (other topics)
Shōgun (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Laura Ingalls Wilder (other topics)John Jakes (other topics)
Alexandra David-Néel (other topics)
Ann Rinaldi (other topics)
Ken Follett (other topics)
More...