Terminalcoffee discussion

note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
37 views
Feeling Nostalgic? The archives > trailer (There is no way to title this so it isn't confusing)

Comments Showing 1-24 of 24 (24 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

Jackie "the Librarian" | 8991 comments Now is the time for rumpusing!


message 3: by Nuri (new)

Nuri (nools) | 538 comments I am a little bit anxious, peeking cautiously from afar. I don't like it when Hollywood tampers with my childhood favorites. But... maybe this one will be okay?


message 4: by Seizure Romero (new)

Seizure Romero | 99 comments Trailer than what?


message 5: by Sally, la reina (new)

Sally (mrsnolte) | 17373 comments Mod
trail⋅er
   /ˈtreɪlər/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [trey-ler:] Show IPA
–noun
1. a large van or wagon drawn by an automobile, truck, or tractor, used esp. in hauling freight by road. Compare full trailer, semitrailer.
2. Also called travel trailer. a vehicle attached to an automobile and used as a mobile home or place of business, usually equipped with furniture, kitchen facilities, bathroom, etc. Compare tent trailer.
3. a person or thing that trails.
4. a trailing plant.
5. a short promotional film composed of clips showing highlights of a movie due for release in the near future.


message 6: by Seizure Romero (new)

Seizure Romero | 99 comments ::cricketcricket::
::cricketcricket::


message 7: by Jane (new)

Jane I was skeptical at first - I mean how can you stretch that book into a feature length film? - but it looks promising and you can never go wrong with Spike Jonez.


message 8: by Jane (new)

Jane Plus - and maybe I'm wrong - but it's doesn't really look like he's using SGI or whatever it is the special effects kids are using these days. I get so tired of that crap sometimes.


message 9: by Heidi (new)

Heidi (heidihooo) | 10825 comments :') <--- those are the happiest of happy tears.



message 10: by Cosmic Sher (new)

Cosmic Sher (sherart) | 2234 comments ::Happy, Happy, Joy, Joy!::
I am so excited I can't stand it! My favorite book of all time. I hope it's good.... :D (hee-hee!)


message 11: by Matthieu (last edited Mar 25, 2009 08:04PM) (new)

Matthieu | 1009 comments I'm cautiously excited. They better not ruin this. You hear me, Spike? Don't screw this up.


message 12: by Cosmic Sher (new)

Cosmic Sher (sherart) | 2234 comments A-freakin-men!


message 13: by RandomAnthony (new)

RandomAnthony | 14536 comments I agree with Jane in that the first thing I thought was, "really? A whole movie on this short book?"

I'd like to be excited but part of the coolness of this book, in my eyes, was the paradox between the few words and the rich images. I don't see how you recreate that in film.


message 14: by Sarah (new)

Sarah | 13814 comments I think Spike Jonze is a reasonable substitute for Tim Burton.


message 15: by Sarah (new)

Sarah | 13814 comments I think Jonze and Gondry both have the dreamworld sensibility down pat, and I think that's a great aesthetic for this book (or In the Night Kitchen).
I don't know if Sendak needs the Burton gothic thing, much as I love it.


message 16: by RandomAnthony (new)

RandomAnthony | 14536 comments That's a fascinating point, William. I wonder how much dialogue will be included...


message 17: by Nuri (new)

Nuri (nools) | 538 comments Whaaat? People have watched 3-Iron east of the Pacific?! I am so excited!

But more importantly:
Eggers is writing the script?!

I am a little bit concerned because whereas I've liked the few things I've read by him, I don't think minimalism when I think Eggers.

And yet, it's Eggers and Jonze.

I am warming up to the idea, but hesitantly.


message 18: by Julie (new)

Julie | 568 comments Hmmmm, yeah, I worry a little about Eggers writing this particular script.
The trailer was awesome looking, though.



message 19: by Sarah (new)

Sarah | 13814 comments Maybe Wall-E helped show that a movie without much dialogue can still be made palatable to American audiences...


message 20: by Kevin (new)

Kevin  (ksprink) | 11469 comments i have never read this story so i have no real comment but i love the theme song.


message 21: by Sarah (new)

Sarah | 13814 comments That is a great movie, but I think he does have a certain sensibility that comes out in the majority of his movies. I love it...but I think it is his own visual style, and it would get in the way of Sendak's.

And do you need to have overt gothic touches if you have Bela Lugosi/Martin Landau?


message 22: by Jane (new)

Jane William wrote: "Randomanthony wrote: "I agree with Jane in that the first thing I thought was, "really? A whole movie on this short book?"

I'd like to be excited but part of the coolness of this book, in my eyes..."


William, watching the preview made me wonder that. In a way it kind of looked like they were trying to throw in a subplot with the boy's real life, but if it relied primarily on visuals to tell the story, I think that would be fascinating.


message 23: by Cosmic Sher (new)

Cosmic Sher (sherart) | 2234 comments "i have never read this story so i have no real comment but i love the theme song"

Oh Kevin, that is the saddest thing I have heard in a long, long time. And, you have grown kids, don't you? How did they make it through without reading this?

You must, MUST, go out right now and find this book and revel in it. It is a staple that cannot be denied.
Done with my rant. :)


message 24: by Nuri (last edited Mar 26, 2009 08:55PM) (new)

Nuri (nools) | 538 comments Sorry, Will, I've only seen 3-Iron and Spring, Summer, Fall, Winter... and Spring. I enjoyed them both, though I liked the first one better. After watching 3-Iron for the first time, I was so conscious of speech, and I couldn't bear to talk because words sounded so crude and vulgar to me. (I got over it pretty quick, but it was a weird couple hours.) Any other films you'd recommend in particular?


back to top
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.