The Sword and Laser discussion

This topic is about
Bridge of Birds
2013 Reads
>
BoB: I think farce is just not my cup of oolong.
date
newest »


Incidentally, I have generally found that when it comes to books I will enjoy, characters are the most crucial thing. If I don't find one I can connect with and care about, I won't be able to connect with the story.

Despite my lack of laughing out loud, there were bright spots in the book that were meant to be funny, in addition to the pretty imagery. But like Ruth, I do find it more difficult to get into a book where none of the characters touch my sympathies. Number Ten Ox comes close, but he's so strong and capable, despite his self-effacing attitude, that he kind of reminds me of the Road Runner, especially when you ad in Master Li's wacky attitude toward certain death.
There's a lot to like in the story. I can see why Aaron likes it so much.

Contrast, in this case, is the secret to the book's strength. It's why Dirk Gently is better than Hitchiker's Guide.
Oo. I just found my next whiteboard.
I guess it's because the characters in these books seem so cartoonish that I can't get invested in their fates. When people die, it has the same impact on me as when Wiley E. Coyote gets smashed by an metric ton of boulders: barely any at all.
It makes me sad to not be able to really enjoy this kind of story, but this slight flaw in my character makes reading a story like Bridge of Birds feel kind of dull. *sigh*
Does anyone else suffer from this lack of appreciation for farce?