UK Amazon Kindle Forum discussion

70 views
General Chat - anything Goes > Bad Grammar Loose in Public

Comments Showing 1-50 of 105 (105 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1 3

message 1: by A.L. (new)

A.L. Butcher (alb2012) | 1608 comments So our women's toilet at work is just down the corridor from the gent's. The sign for the gent's lo which I am forced to look at every time I walk down the corridor says "gentlemen toilets".


Arrrghh!!!!

Anyone else have any examples of bad grammar on the loose?


message 2: by Lorraine (new)

Lorraine Versini (lorraineversini) | 8438 comments It's still better than having little shapes !

I went to an office for some training, popped to the toilet...
A little later, looked in the direction and saw a man enter the toilets. Told my colleague inductee "I've just seen a man go into the ladies' toilets"
You should have seen the look on my face when I went to the loo again and realised I'd gone to the wrong one the first time lol !


message 3: by Joo (new)

Joo (jooo) | 1351 comments or was it bad grammar on the loos?

I'd be out with my marker pen.


message 4: by A.L. (new)

A.L. Butcher (alb2012) | 1608 comments Haha.

I went to a rocky horror show a few years back, all in costume. Chap (in drag) got in the wrong queue, decided he was wearing a dress so may as well use the women's loo as he had queued for 15 minutes as it was...

Anyway that sign has been driving me nuts. I don't think I noticed at first... I don't pay attention to the goings on in the men's loo but now I have seen it I can't help looking in the hope someone has changed it.


message 6: by Kath (new)

Kath Middleton | 23860 comments It's the feral apostrophe that raises my blood pressure. People will, even in printed signs, put one in a plural. MOT's, CD's, DVD's even the 1980's. Whip 'em out! They're plurals, not possessives.

Right, I'm off for a lie-down in the dark!


message 7: by A.L. (new)

A.L. Butcher (alb2012) | 1608 comments The thing is I suppose we are so used to seeing them CDs, MOTs etc look wrong. The spellchecker gets 'em as well.


message 8: by Jonathan (new)

Jonathan Hill | 1599 comments Oh there are too many to mention here! The worst is at one of Manchester's main theatres. The huge glowing sign in the foyer announces 'CONFECTIONARY'. *shudders*


message 9: by Kath (new)

Kath Middleton | 23860 comments Aye, you can't scrape that off with your thumbnail, can you! (I did that at a pet shop with Gecko's painted on the glass case!)


message 10: by A.L. (new)

A.L. Butcher (alb2012) | 1608 comments Stationery and Stationary are common ones. I have seen someone miss out the L in "public transport" which was rather unfortunate.

With spelling I don't think text speak helps. My sis teaches English and someone submitted an essay written in text speak, it got a fail;)


message 11: by Kath (new)

Kath Middleton | 23860 comments I don't even use text speak in text messages. I have been justifiably called a pedant though!


Patti (baconater) (goldengreene) | 56525 comments Adam's your joking!

I h8 that!


message 14: by Nick (new)

Nick Wastnage (nickwastnage) | 196 comments Oh to have a spell check. Mine went on strike yesterday with the message, 'word can no longer spell check this document as there are two many spelling errors!' I'd been having a fight with it over English US and UK. I set it to English UK, typed 'Did you see the colour of that...'
It underlined colour, wanting to spell it color, and then the message appeared on the screen. They were the only seven letters of the document that I'd typed. It's old word software, and I guess it's a bit tired.


message 15: by A.L. (new)

A.L. Butcher (alb2012) | 1608 comments Hahaha. I think one of the problems with spellcheckers is they do not always pick up a correctly spelled word used in the wrong context. Although Word 7 one does.

My friend had an over zealous, politically correct grammar/spellchecker. She writes fantasy and was using "maid" in the context of a virgin girl - spellchecker suggested "houseworker," it also disagreed with "husband," "father" etc suggestiing "life partner" and "life giver" as non gender-specific terms. Yes I can see the YA audience going with that.


message 16: by Sara (last edited Feb 23, 2013 09:57AM) (new)

Sara Boyd (saraboydauthor) | 1211 comments Politically correct gone mad I would say... what's wrong with 'husband' or 'father'? Life giver... sounds like a Sci-fi/Dystopian spellcheck.


message 17: by Sara (new)

Sara Boyd (saraboydauthor) | 1211 comments Imagine if you could get spellchecks for the different genres...


message 18: by Léandre (new)

Léandre Chasseor | 27 comments Father, life giver?

It kind of make me think of a fashion amongst nobility that made the use of periphrasis a very sophisticated thing to do. Les préciosités. Did you ever hear about it? (We do in France while we are in school.)


message 19: by Karen (new)

Karen Lowe | 1338 comments There's a box transit (think that's what it's called - small white lorry, anyway) locally that's for a small hire company. Boldly emblazoned on its side is...
'What's in you'r lorry?'
Oh. Dear.


message 20: by A.L. (new)

A.L. Butcher (alb2012) | 1608 comments Lol. They probably spend all the money getting the signs printed.


message 21: by Karen (new)

Karen Lowe | 1338 comments Makes me cringe every time I see it!


message 22: by Tim (new)

Tim | 8539 comments Alexandra wrote: "Hahaha. I think one of the problems with spellcheckers is they do not always pick up a correctly spelled word used in the wrong context. Although Word 7 one does.

My friend had an over zealous, po..."


Spelt. ;)


message 23: by A.L. (new)

A.L. Butcher (alb2012) | 1608 comments Picky:)

I think, however, both are correct. http://grammarist.com/spelling/spelle...


message 24: by Tim (new)

Tim | 8539 comments Yeah, I'm just ragging on you ;)

I do have a habit though of championing the "less-preferred" alternative when there are multiple ways of spelling a word. And I do love T-form verbs - spelt, smelt, felt, spilt, spilt, spoilt, learnt, burnt, dreamt, leapt, leant, crept...

English, we are always being told, is a continuously evolving language that is enriched by the ways in which it is used. yet there are so many "rules" that boil down to "because somebody says so", and that I think, should be resisted.

Now somebody has probably already hit the reply button to complain that I put a comma outside a closing quote, and that's *wrong* because commas must always be inside quotes. But why? It's not logical. In fact it's not even correct for those of us that live outside America. That "rule" only exists because some nineteenth century printer kept breaking the squiggle off his commas and so decided to swap the characters around. It makes absolutely no sense in the 21st century to punctuate illogically just because someone broke a bit of metal 200 years ago.


message 25: by A.L. (new)

A.L. Butcher (alb2012) | 1608 comments I think there was a discussion a while back about punctuation inside quotes. Personally I was taught it goes INSIDE the little squiggles and it looks weird to me outside.

Looking at your list of T-verbs funnily enough I would say smelt is what you do to metal but spilt, spoilt, learnt, burnt, dreamt, leapt and crept are correct. How odd is that:)

I got lots of wiggly red lines of shame when I typed those.


message 26: by Tim (new)

Tim | 8539 comments And yet for any other separator (brackets for example), -- not (for example,) -- you would put the comma in the logical place. So why not with quotes?

Smelt is more often said than written these days -- he who smelt it dealt it and so on. If you want to say smelled, you can easily argue you should also say dealed...

Wiggly red lines of shame are only someone else going "Because I said so".


message 27: by A.L. (new)

A.L. Butcher (alb2012) | 1608 comments :)


message 28: by Kath (new)

Kath Middleton | 23860 comments And spelt is a kind of high protein wheat.


message 29: by Tim (new)

Tim | 8539 comments Many words are homonyms, but they seem to cope... :)


message 30: by R.M.F. (new)

R.M.F. Brown | 2124 comments Adam wrote: "A good commentary on commonly used bad grammar in public is Eats, Roots and Leaves, not to be confused with the better known Eats, Shoots & Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation."

It's a good book, but a year or two ago, it was pointed out in a national newspaper that the correct title should be: ate, shot, and left. Even the experts get it wrong!


message 31: by A.L. (new)

A.L. Butcher (alb2012) | 1608 comments Hahaha.


message 32: by Jud (new)

Jud (judibud) | 16799 comments Ignite wrote: "It's the feral apostrophe that raises my blood pressure. People will, even in printed signs, put one in a plural. MOT's, CD's, DVD's even the 1980's. Whip 'em out! They're plurals, not possessi..."

I'm guilty of this!

I'm terrible at grammar but I hate reading a book with bad grammar ~(I'm such a hypocrite). If I was to release a book though I would have someone else read over it purely to correct grammar and then someone to proof read it after that. Any published work should not be badly written

Reading some of the posts in here really baffle me I don't get gramamr.


message 33: by R.M.F. (new)

R.M.F. Brown | 2124 comments Adam wrote: "R.M.F wrote: "It's a good book, but a year or two ago, it was pointed out in a national newspaper that the correct title should be: ate, shot, and left. Even the experts get it wrong! "

Actually, ..."


If it were up to me, the Australians wouldn't be allowed to breed! :)

Back on topic: I read an article that the semi-colon is dying out in favour of the comma. Is anybody gnashing their teeth over this prospect, or is this good news?


message 34: by Jud (new)

Jud (judibud) | 16799 comments I have no idea when a semi-colon should be used


message 35: by Jud (new)

Jud (judibud) | 16799 comments (or indeed, a full stop, comma, or colon).

Remembered my full stop that time.


message 36: by Kath (new)

Kath Middleton | 23860 comments I don't often use a semicolon myself. I tend to start a new sentence - like that! However, teeth are gnashed here when 'sentences' are strung together with commas. When an author starts on a new tack but just links it to the previous sentence with a comma I want to throw things. Buses. Big rocks.


message 37: by Jud (new)

Jud (judibud) | 16799 comments colon *giggles*


message 38: by Kath (new)

Kath Middleton | 23860 comments You, Missy, can stay in after class!


message 39: by R.M.F. (new)

R.M.F. Brown | 2124 comments Jud (Disney Diva) wrote: "I have no idea when a semi-colon should be used"

A statement of that kind should result in a lifetime ban from this group! :)


message 40: by Kath (new)

Kath Middleton | 23860 comments Oi - we need her!


message 41: by Jud (new)

Jud (judibud) | 16799 comments R.M.F wrote: "Jud (Disney Diva) wrote: "I have no idea when a semi-colon should be used"

A statement of that kind should result in a lifetime ban from this group! :)"


Thanks Ignite!

I'll have you know, I'm part of the furniture here. Plus I am getting better at my grammar from being here.


message 42: by Beverley (new)

Beverley Carter | 186 comments Agree with all of the above, but what really gets my goat is when people leave the 'e' in words with an 'ing' ending. Can't they see it looks wrong?

I do sort of love the greengrocer's apostrophe. I think it's quite endearing how some people think that whenever there's an 's' on the end of the word, there should be an apostrophe before it. Bless. Or should that be bles's. Or ble's's? It's all so confusing.


message 43: by Jud (last edited Feb 26, 2013 04:02AM) (new)

Jud (judibud) | 16799 comments My School was Friends' School but I don't know why the apostrophe came after the s.

It comes before when a letter is missing i.e. that is = that's
or if it's mine = Judith's

Is that right?

So when does it come after the s?


Rosemary (grooving with the Picts) (nosemanny) | 8590 comments Because there is more than one Friend. And Friends's would be silly!


message 45: by Jud (new)

Jud (judibud) | 16799 comments Well it's named after the Society of Friends


message 46: by Beverley (new)

Beverley Carter | 186 comments My school was Stevenage Girls' School. Because there was more than one girl. When I was at said school, we were taught that if in doubt, turn the sentence around and put the apostrophe on the end. ie, the school of friends. This is friends' school. The home of Judith = Judith's home. It works for me anyway!


message 47: by Tim (new)

Tim | 8539 comments Some years ago, a friend got cancer of the colon and had to be operated on. By pure coincidence he also used to play Sergeant Colon in our Discworld productions. After the op, he got a nice little note from Terry Pratchett, telling him that from then on he would be known as Sergeant SemiColon.


message 48: by Beverley (new)

Beverley Carter | 186 comments Tim wrote: "Some years ago, a friend got cancer of the colon and had to be operated on. By pure coincidence he also used to play Sergeant Colon in our Discworld productions. After the op, he got a nice little ..."

Attention to detail, that's what it's all about!


message 49: by Jud (new)

Jud (judibud) | 16799 comments Beverley wrote: "My school was Stevenage Girls' School. Because there was more than one girl. When I was at said school, we were taught that if in doubt, turn the sentence around and put the apostrophe on the end..."

That just makes my brain hurt


Lynne (Tigger's Mum) | 4643 comments I went to a Grammar school and the large painted sign high on the wall sign had been altered from grammer unfortunately the paint was a slightly darker shade so it looked awful. A note/not worthy old boy is the Chief executive of the NHS. And don't mention Dr Shipman!


« previous 1 3
back to top