Georgette Heyer Fans discussion

This topic is about
Georgette Heyer
The Books
>
Have you read this biography?
date
newest »

message 1:
by
Tasha
(new)
-
added it
Feb 01, 2013 12:51PM

reply
|
flag

Nice review! I look forward to reading it one day!

Great review. Makes me wish I had less on my plate so I could dig in now






Absolutely. Thank you for marking the date.

I'm intending to sandwich it between my other reading though - not try to finish it all in one hit.
Loving the family photos - anyone else think that GH looks a lot like some of her heroes? :D


The cover picture of the Koestler biography - that is a lot how I picture Abigail from the Black Sheep. But in the picture that Christy B has used for this site GH really makes me think of a lot of her heroes - dark & sardonic looking.

I have just finished the biography and that was my main disappointment, too. I also hoped to read more about the research which Georgette Heyer did to create (or recreate) her Regency world, but although there is a action late on in the biography about her notebooks there was not as much information as I'd hoped.
What is quite clear from the biography is that Heyer was very conservative and class-conscious in a way which is much less acceptable now than it was when she was young. Kloester emphasis that she was Edwardian by birth (1902) and upbringing:
"Although the Regency world she created was faithful in its historical detail, it was also a carefully constructed entity which reflected the Edwardian values, ideals and social mores with which she had grown up. Georgette felt at home in the Regency because it was an era which reached forward into her childhood and writing about it enabled her to escape to a time which felt safe, comfortable and familiar."

Same here - I knew there wasn't much personal information available, & I know the notebooks are still in existence as Judy Rougier (Richard's second wife) brought at least 2 of them to a conference in Australia in 2012.
http://www.smh.com.au/national/confer...
I liked reading her surviving letters - they did give more of a sense of what she was like to people she trusted.

However, I've been doing an awful lot of serious re-reading of Heyer's works over the last few years (thanks, group!), and now I'm enjoying finding out just what she thought of her own works, and finding out that I tend to agree with her, as I did with A Blunt Instrument, and as I did on reading An Infamous Army again.
I'm only up to the late 1930s, so I'm looking forward to the progression.
Oh, and I actually really like the letters! She lets herself go when she has a pen and a reason for writing, and I find them very entertaining - and also very revealing.

The money issues made me sad. How stressful!
Her serious illnesses, falls and broken bones (the Dexedrine!) while continuing to write made me sad, too, but absolutely gave me a feeling of awe at how she contrived to write while dealing with them. To say that she had a will of iron is to understate the case severely.
The humor! Several of her letters made me laugh out loud.
Kloester does a very good job of not throwing her 21st century mores into the book. But one spot made me wrinkle my brow: she mentions how Heyer would "defer" occasionally during social situations at home to her husband, so that he could be the head of the household. And I thought to myself that any couple who had been married for decades does the same thing, regardless of which sex is "deferring". It's more a matter of showing ones pride in ones spouse than it is an actual kow-tow-ing.
Insightful read, and I'm glad I casually picked it up!

I know I found Koestler's style a little dry which was a surprise. In person she is warm & engaging - & a very good public speaker.
Edited for typos.

The money issues made me sad. How stressful!
Her serious illnesses, falls and broken bones (the Dexedrine!) while continuing to write made ..."
Great Comments Karlyne - I very much agree.