Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

40 views
Book & Author Page Issues > Previously published book changed to title of book to be published later.

Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Anastasia (last edited Feb 01, 2013 01:47AM) (new)

Anastasia (tdallonsy) | 301 comments There's a book that's been re-named and the publication date pushed to mid year 2013, however it's wrong as existing record was of different book; http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/17... is a compilation of issues 6 - 10, the original edition was just the issue 6 and has already been published last year. Should not have this new one have been added as a separate book/compilation instead of modifying/deleting an existing book. because the edit that was carried out, has also messed up the reviews as well as user statistics. Having said that, issues 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are now missing from GR altogether. Should the individual issues be added again?


message 2: by Nenangs (new)

Nenangs | 464 comments looking at the librarian edits log:

http://www.goodreads.com/book/edits/1...

it looks to be last edited by a super librarian. perhaps somebody request a deletion in the "delete by super" thread for some reason?


message 3: by Banjomike (new)

Banjomike | 5166 comments Individual comics aren't generally encouraged on Goodreads so perhaps she was replacing the five individuals with a single paperback.


message 4: by Anastasia (new)

Anastasia (tdallonsy) | 301 comments Why replace? Why not just add a new record? The reviews are all jumbled up and don't necessarily apply to the edition / issues people have reviewed. (some of the issues described as part of this compilation, are yet to be published)


message 5: by Banjomike (new)

Banjomike | 5166 comments Anastasia wrote: "Why replace? Why not just add a new record? The reviews are all jumbled up and don't necessarily apply to the edition / issues people have reviewed. (some of the issues described as part of this compilation, are yet to be published)"

I agree with all that.


back to top