Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

This topic is about
Conundrum
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Book & Author Page Issues
>
I am slowly being driven mad by Goodreads...Help!
date
newest »


(And, you'll need to correct yourself on the bookseller sites that are using the wrong isbn 9780985389741. There are no automatic links between our database and their product pages.)

(And, you'll need to correct yourself on the bookseller sites that are using the wrong isbn. There are no automatic links between our database and their producr pages.)"
The bookseller sites are using the CORRECT ISBN, the only offending use of that ISBN is on goodreads!
I can supply a new ISBN if necessary, or it really should have none, being no longer in existence, as you say.

I'm not trying to be difficult, I am honestly confused by that.
Cait? Any other librarians understand? Is it just me confused?

I'm not trying to be difficult, I am honestly confused by that."
How? As explained in the beginning of this thread, please read the whole thread, a mistake was made entering the ARC ISBN, a 'clerical error' if you will, based on a misunderstanding of this incredibly complex and frustrating system of 'editions' going on at goodreads.

As I understand it, the problem is that he/she made an entry in the GR database for a draft using the ISBN meant for the final release. Since one ISBN can only be used once, the novel is now without an ISBN on GR. The ISBN here on GR was never meant for anything but the final novel. Using it for the draft was where it all went wrong.

Okay, I had never heard that definition before but now I know the goodreads-speak for it. LOL, must be about as bad as everything that's meant when assorted posters mention shelving. That will teach me to go by dictionary definitions.

As I understand it, the problem is that he/she made an entry in the GR database for a draft us..."
Yes! Thank you. Technically, it is not 'without an ISBN' it is 'with' a decidedly incorrect one.

But, since this case seems so unique, I doubt anyone would attempt a change before staff and/or Rivka give their ok.

We are patient. We have suffered 'support' indifference for three months now despite repeated requests, and we can wait a bit longer.
Thank you all for concerning yourselves!

(I have no clue about support response or how you were contacting support, someone should have directed you to this group for book issues.)

(I have no clue about support response or how you were contacting support, someone should have directed you to this group for book issues.)"
no, pULEEESE pretty plese, read prior posts, the whole thread. The ISBN's at booksellers are 100% correct. The only offender is a dead sea scroll at goodreads ;-)

No more posts for me on this thread. I obviously don't get it. I did not know an isbn could be generated just for the book on goodreads; most authors just use the same isbns they use to sell the book.
Debbie wrote: "I had never heard that definition before but now I know the goodreads-speak for it."
That is most assuredly NOT GR-speak. Goodreads does not recognize the validity of "unpublishing" a book. To me, and to every GR staff member with whom I have discussed this in the past, "unpublished" means never published. The other thing is called "out of print".
As far as this thread, it seems to be going in circles. As the decision will be made by Support, I'm closing this thread.
That is most assuredly NOT GR-speak. Goodreads does not recognize the validity of "unpublishing" a book. To me, and to every GR staff member with whom I have discussed this in the past, "unpublished" means never published. The other thing is called "out of print".
As far as this thread, it seems to be going in circles. As the decision will be made by Support, I'm closing this thread.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
The default edition on goodreads, if not set..."
Puleese read the whole thread. I say defunct, I mean defunct, an ARC version that was radically revised and never published in its ARC form. Dead letter, not 'default.'