The Memory Keeper's Daughter
discussion
the memory keeper's daughter by kim edwards
message 1:
by
Mandi
(new)
-
rated it 3 stars
Jan 08, 2008 01:04PM

reply
|
flag



















Also, as I mention in my review, the details just aren't credible. For example, the man's name was David Henry McAllister. When he was accepted to college, the person typing the acceptance left off the name "McAllister," so he was able to live the rest of his life as David Henry. Come one - what about Social Security? What about his high school transcript? What about birth certificates?
I have to wonder why the author put so many of these stupid, unbelievable details in her novel. Doesn't she know that they disrupt the flow of the story?
I, too, am glad I didn't buy the book.





My sister lives in Lexington KY, the primary setting for this book, and recommended it to me based on its local popularity. I enjoyed the study of the impact of a lie on the lives of all the characters, but would have preferred more character development. I wouldn't recommend this book.


Cathy




Norah was incredibly selfish. Yes, David lied and robbed her of raising her child, but she didn't know that! Had Phoebe actually died, the circumstances, to Norah, would have been the same. She seemed to balme him, and she knew of nothin wrong on his part until he was already dead! I also felt it was a cop-out for him not to have to face Norah when she found out.
Of course you can't tell until someone is pressed upon, but Norah didn't seem to have the emotional fortitude raising Phoebe would have required. Perhaps David gave her the best life she could have hoped for.




A T.V. movie? Never heard of it. Hmmm I'll have to look into it. I too enjoyed this book. Sure it had it's moments but over all I thought it was an interesting read. I'd recommended it to friends.

Maybe you needed to have some disable people in your family to understand the true meaning of the book.

We all loved it .
I thought it was just a lovely read,it may not be literature but i enjoyed reading it.
I agree with Linda about having a different perspective if you live with a disabled person.


ditto - i didnt like the book at all
Well I seem to be one of the few who enjoyed this book, very enjoyable.

For me this book startedout slow, but I ended up crying in the end. So I am going to stay stick with it! ;)

I read the book eons ago but I had a hard getting through the book for an entirely differrent reason .. my brother has Down syndrome and I can not imagine anyone doing what the father did to that child.

I completely agree. It seems like he got a free pass while the mother was deemed the evil one. The way I saw it, her actions were directly related to the choice HE made. Him alone. He gave their child away without her consent/knowledge. That is unforgivable. An affair is nothing by comparison, imho. At anytime he could have confessed, but he never did.

I comple..."
his decision could not have affected Nora, she never knew so it couldnt have possibly been 'directly releated'. Giving their child away was unforgivable, but openly having an affair and destroying the family is not okay. david did not really destroy the family because none of them knew about Pheobe. So what Nora did was terrible.

all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic